Literature DB >> 28598897

Adverse Events Detection Through Global Trigger Tool Methodology: Results From a 5-Year Study in an Italian Hospital and Opportunities to Improve Interrater Reliability.

Alberto Mortaro1, Francesca Moretti, Diana Pascu, Lorella Tessari, Stefano Tardivo, Serena Pancheri, Garon Marta, Gabriele Romano, Mariangela Mazzi, Paolo Montresor, James M Naessens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Global Trigger Tool (GTT) has been proposed as a low-cost method to detect adverse events (AEs). The validity of the methodology has been questioned because of moderate interrater agreement. Continuous training has been suggested as a means to improve consistency over time. We present the main findings of the implementation of the Italian version of the GTT and evaluate efforts to improve the interrater reliability over time.
METHODS: The Italian version of the GTT was developed and implemented at the San Bonifacio Hospital, a 270-bed secondary care acute hospital in Verona, Italy. Ten clinical records randomly selected every 2 weeks were reviewed from 2009 to 2014. Two-stage interrater reliability assessment between team members was conducted on 2 subsamples of 50 clinical records before and after the implementation of specific review rules and staff training.
RESULTS: Among 1320 medical records reviewed, a total of 366 AEs were found with at least 1 AE on 20.2% of all discharges, 27.7 AEs/100 admissions, and 30.6 AEs/1000 patient-days. Adverse events with harm score E and F were respectively 58.2% (n = 213) and 38.8% (n = 142). First round interrater reliability was comparable with other international studies. The interrater agreement improved significantly after intervention (κ interrater I = 0.52, κ interrater II = 0.80, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the improvements in the interrater consistency, overall results did not show any significant trend in AEs over time. Future studies may be directed to apply and adapt the GTT methodology to more specific settings to explore how to improve its sensitivity.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28598897     DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Saf        ISSN: 1549-8417            Impact factor:   2.844


  5 in total

1.  Assessing the development and implementation of the Global Trigger Tool method across a large health system in Sicily.

Authors:  Vincenzo Parrinello; Elena Grasso; Giuseppe Saglimbeni; Gabriella Patanè; Alma Scalia; Giuseppe Murolo; Peter Lachman
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-07

2.  Adverse event detection by medical record review is reproducible, but the assessment of their preventability is not.

Authors:  Dorthe O Klein; Roger J M W Rennenberg; Richard P Koopmans; Martin H Prins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Systematic Review of Methods for Medical Record Analysis to Detect Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Dorthe O Klein; Roger J M W Rennenberg; Richard P Koopmans; Martin H Prins
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.243

4.  Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luisa C Eggenschwiler; Anne W S Rutjes; Sarah N Musy; Dietmar Ausserhofer; Natascha M Nielen; René Schwendimann; Maria Unbeck; Michael Simon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  A Narrative Review of Adverse Event Detection, Monitoring, and Prevention in Indian Hospitals.

Authors:  Snehil Verman; Ashish Anjankar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.