A Buggy1, Z Moore2. 1. Professional Certificate (Community Nursing), RGN, CNM 2 Integrated Case Manager for Older Persons, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. 2. Dip First Line Management, RGN, Professor and Head of the School of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the multidisciplinary team in the management of the diabetic foot compared with those who did not receive multidisciplinary care. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the following databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: diabetic foot, multidisciplinary team, patient care team, multidisciplinary care team. Data were extracted using a bespoke data extraction tool and quality appraisal of the studies was undertaken using the EBL Critical Appraisal checklist. Data analysis was undertaken using RevMan with results presented as odds ratio for dichotomous data, or mean difference for continuous data, all with the associated 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The search identified 19 eligible studies. Severity of amputation, death rates and length of hospital stay of clients receiving multidisciplinary team care were improved when compared with those who did not receive multidisciplinary team care. Ulcer healing and quality of life showed an improvement but not all studies explored these outcomes. Only 7 of the 19 articles appraised were found to be of acceptable quality, questioning the generalisability of the results. CONCLUSION: From the currently available evidence a positive impact of the multidisciplinary team on diabetic foot outcomes can be seen, but due to the lack of high-quality evidence and substantial heterogeneity in the studies, these results should be interpreted with caution.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the multidisciplinary team in the management of the diabetic foot compared with those who did not receive multidisciplinary care. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the following databases: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used: diabetic foot, multidisciplinary team, patient care team, multidisciplinary care team. Data were extracted using a bespoke data extraction tool and quality appraisal of the studies was undertaken using the EBL Critical Appraisal checklist. Data analysis was undertaken using RevMan with results presented as odds ratio for dichotomous data, or mean difference for continuous data, all with the associated 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The search identified 19 eligible studies. Severity of amputation, death rates and length of hospital stay of clients receiving multidisciplinary team care were improved when compared with those who did not receive multidisciplinary team care. Ulcer healing and quality of life showed an improvement but not all studies explored these outcomes. Only 7 of the 19 articles appraised were found to be of acceptable quality, questioning the generalisability of the results. CONCLUSION: From the currently available evidence a positive impact of the multidisciplinary team on diabetic foot outcomes can be seen, but due to the lack of high-quality evidence and substantial heterogeneity in the studies, these results should be interpreted with caution.
Authors: Hassan K Abdulwassi; Mohammed A Safhi; Raghda T Hashim; Anas M Fallatah; Sondos S Hussein; Sultan A Almusallam; Mohammed S Alsaad; Maram T Alkhatieb Journal: Saudi Med J Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Zhiwen Joseph Lo; Sadhana Chandrasekar; Enming Yong; Qiantai Hong; Li Zhang; Lester Rhan Chaen Chong; Glenn Tan; Yam Meng Chan; Hui Yan Koo; Tiffany Chew; Nur Faezah Sani; Keet Yeng Cheong; Leighton Ren Qin Cheng; Audrey Hui Min Tan; Sivakami Muthuveerappa; Tina Peiting Lai; Cheng Cheng Goh; Gary Y Ang; Zhecheng Zhu; Wai Han Hoi; Jaime H X Lin; Daniel E K Chew; Brenda Lim; Pei Shan Yeo; Huiling Liew Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 3.099