Literature DB >> 34314830

Economic value of podiatry service in limb salvage alliance.

Naren Patel1, Tze-Woei Tan1, Craig Weinkauf1, Andrew H Rice1, Allison M Rottman1, Jennifer Pappalardo1, Kaoru Goshima1, Wei Zhou2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE/
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, multidisciplinary "toe and flow" programs have gained great popularity, with proven benefits in limb salvage. Many vascular surgeons have incorporated podiatrists into their practices. The viability of this practice model requires close partnership, hospital support, and financial sustainability. We intend to examine the economic values of podiatrists in a busy safety-net hospital in the Southwest United States.
METHODS: An administrative database that captured monthly operating room (OR) cases, clinic encounters, in-patient volume, and total work relative value units (wRVUs) in an established limb salvage program in a tertiary referral center were examined. The practice has a diverse patient population with >30% of minority patients. During a period of 3 years, there was a significant change in the number of podiatrists (from 1 to 4) within the program, whereas the clinical full-time employees for vascular surgeons remained relatively stable.
RESULTS: The limb salvage program experienced >100% of growth in total OR volumes, clinic encounters, and total wRVUs over a period of 4 years. A total of 35,591 patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary limb salvage clinic, and 5535 procedures were performed. The initial growth of clinic volume and operative volume (P < .01) were attributed by the addition of vascular surgeons in year one. However, recruitment of podiatrists to the program significantly increased clinic and OR volume by an additional 60% and >40%, respectively (P < .01) in the past 3 years. With equal number of surgeons, podiatry contributed 40% of total wRVUs generated by the entire program in 2019. Despite the fact that that most of the foot and ankle procedures that were regularly performed by vascular surgeons were shifted to the podiatrists, vascular surgeons continued to experience an incremental increase in operative volume and >10% of increase in wRVUs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the value of close collaboration between podiatry and vascular in a limb salvage program extends beyond a patient's clinical outcome. A financial advantage of including podiatrists in a vascular surgery practice is clearly demonstrated.
Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Economic; Financial; Limb salvage; Multidisciplinary

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34314830      PMCID: PMC8900989          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  20 in total

Review 1.  The global burden of diabetic foot disease.

Authors:  Andrew J M Boulton; Loretta Vileikyte; Gunnel Ragnarson-Tennvall; Jan Apelqvist
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Andrew J M Boulton; Sicco A Bus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The impact and outcomes of establishing an integrated interdisciplinary surgical team to care for the diabetic foot.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Manish Bharara; Matthew White; Brian Lepow; Sugam Bhatnagar; Timothy Fisher; Heather R Kimbriel; Jodi Walters; Kaoru R Goshima; John Hughes; Joseph L Mills
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.876

4.  Effectiveness of multidisciplinary care teams in reducing major amputation rate in adults with diabetes: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel H Albright; Nivethitha B Manohar; Jennifer F Murillo; Linda Anael M Kengne; Juan J Delgado-Hurtado; Matthew L Diamond; Alyse L Acciani; Adam E Fleischer
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.602

Review 5.  What is the most effective way to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic foot?

Authors:  J Apelqvist; J Larsson
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.876

6.  The impact of a podiatric lead limb preservation team on disease outcomes and risk prediction in the diabetic lower extremity: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Vickie R Driver; Russell A Goodman; Matteo Fabbi; Michael A French; Charles A Andersen
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

7.  Reduction of lower extremity clinical abnormalities in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  D K Litzelman; C W Slemenda; C D Langefeld; L M Hays; M A Welch; D E Bild; E S Ford; F Vinicor
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Diabetes- and nondiabetes-related lower extremity amputation incidence before and after the introduction of better organized diabetes foot care: continuous longitudinal monitoring using a standard method.

Authors:  Ronan J Canavan; Nigel C Unwin; William F Kelly; Vincent M Connolly
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Burden of diabetic foot disorders, guidelines for management and disparities in implementation in Europe: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kristien van Acker; Philippe Léger; Agnes Hartemann; Abhineet Chawla; Mohd Kashif Siddiqui
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.876

Review 10.  Epidemiology of peripheral artery disease in Europe: VAS Educational Paper.

Authors:  Dan-Mircea Olinic; Mihail Spinu; Maria Olinic; Calin Homorodean; Dan-Alexandru Tataru; Aaron Liew; Gerit-Holger Schernthaner; Agata Stanek; Gerry Fowkes; Mariella Catalano
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.789

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.