Literature DB >> 28597300

Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult scoliosis: comparison of four radiological predictor models.

Amer Sebaaly1,2, Guillaume Riouallon3, Ibrahim Obeid4, Pierre Grobost5, Maroun Rizkallah6, Fethi Laouissat5, Yann-Phillippe Charles7, Pierre Roussouly5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study is to identify the best immediate postoperative radiological predictors for the occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Four proposed methods will be explored.
METHODS: A homogeneous database of adult scoliosis from multiple centers was used. Patients with whole spine X-rays at the required follow-up (FU) periods were included. Spinal and pelvic parameters were measured and calculated to compare four predictive methods: Method 1: assessment of the global sagittal alignment (GSA); Method 2: restoration of the theoretical values of lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) according to pelvic incidence (PI); Method 3: evaluation of TK + LL, and Method 4: restoration of the apex of sagittal LL to its theoretical values according to various spine shapes in Roussouly Classification. PJK occurrence was assessed at the last FU radiograph.
RESULTS: 250 patients were included; mean age was 56.67 years and mean FU was 2.5 years. PJK occurred in 25.6% of cases. PJK occurred in 19.9% in patients with a GSA <45° and in 29.9% where GSA >45° (p = 0.04, OR = 1.71). Restoring the sagittal apex of the LL to its theoretical values according to PI deceased PJK to 13.5% compared to 38.9% in the other cases (p = 0.01, OR = 4.6). The two other described methods (2 and 3) were not significant predictors. DISCUSSION: The comparison between the four predictive methods showed that a GSA >45° and restoration of sagittal apex of lordosis according to PI, were the most predictive methods for PJK in ASD. The latter had a higher predictive value. Our findings could prove useful in effective preoperative planning in ASD surgery to reduce PJK rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Global sagittal alignment; Proximal junctional kyphosis; Roussouly classification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28597300     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5172-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

1.  Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters.

Authors:  Eric Berthonnaud; Joannès Dimnet; Pierre Roussouly; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-02

2.  Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops(®).

Authors:  C Maillot; E Ferrero; D Fort; C Heyberger; J-C Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Type of Anchor at the Proximal Fusion Level Has a Significant Effect on the Incidence of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Outcome in Adults After Long Posterior Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Hamid Hassanzadeh; Sachin Gupta; Amit Jain; Mostafa H El Dafrawy; Richard L Skolasky; Khaled M Kebaish
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2013-08-02

4.  Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; King B Akilah; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Colin Nnadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Patients with proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision surgery have higher postoperative lumbar lordosis and larger sagittal balance corrections.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Moon Soo Park; Kwang Sup Song; Chaiwat Piyaskulkaew; Tapanut Chuntarapas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Selection of fusion levels in adults with spinal deformity: an update.

Authors:  Benjamin Blondel; Amy M Wickman; Alexios Apazidis; Virginie C Lafage; Frank J Schwab; John A Bendo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  An analysis of sagittal curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann's disease. A review of 32 patients.

Authors:  T G Lowe; M D Kasten
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Chris R Glattes; Seungchul Rhim; Gene Cheh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Richard Hostin; Ian McCarthy; Michael OʼBrien; Shay Bess; Breton Line; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Doug Burton; Munish Gupta; Christopher Ames; Vedat Deviren; Khaled Kebaish; Christopher Shaffrey; Kirkham Wood; Robert Hart
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity and the effect of restoring the spinal shapes according to the Roussouly classification: a multicentric study.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Martin Gehrchen; Clément Silvestre; Khalil Kharrat; Tanvir Johanning Bari; Gabi Kreichati; Maroun Rizkallah; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Restoring the ideal Roussouly sagittal profile in adult scoliosis surgery decreases the risk of mechanical complications.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Lucía Moreno-Manzanaro; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Caglar Yilgor; Ibrahim Obeid; Ahmet Alanay; Frank Kleinstück; Emre R Acaroglu; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis after internal fixation for adult spinal deformity: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Kai Chen; Xiao Zhai; Kai Chen; Ming Li; Yanghu Lu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Reviewer's comment concerning "Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification" by F. Laouissat et al. (2017). doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x (Epub ahead of print).

Authors:  Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Revisiting thoracic kyphosis: a normative description of the thoracic sagittal curve in an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Clément Silvestre; Maroun Rizkallah; Pierre Grobost; Thomas Chevillotte; Khalil Kharrat; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity: a novel predictive index.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Mingyuan Yang; Yilin Yang; Xin Yin; Changwei Yang; Li Li; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Scoliosis surgery in adulthood: what challenges for what outcome?

Authors:  Yann Philippe Charles; Yves Ntilikina
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-01

8.  Static and dynamic sagittal lumbar apex: a new concept for the assessment of lumbar lordosis distribution in spinal deformity.

Authors:  Chizuo Iwai; Javier Pizones; Louis Boissière; Sreenath Jakinapally; Çaglar Yilgor; Daniel Larrieu; Ferran Pellise; Jean-Marc Vital; Anouar Bourghli; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Flexibility of thoracic kyphosis affects postoperative sagittal alignment in adult patients with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Sebastian Decker; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Wolfgang Hitzl; Christian Krettek; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Possible factors associated with sagittal malalignment recurrence after pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  David Eichler; Yann Philippe Charles; Florent Baldairon; Yves Ntilikina; Erik André Sauleau; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.