Literature DB >> 28597236

Bayesian analysis of the piecewise diffusion decision model.

William R Holmes1, Jennifer S Trueblood2.   

Abstract

Most past research on sequential sampling models of decision-making have assumed a time homogeneous process (i.e., parameters such as drift rates and boundaries are constant and do not change during the deliberation process). This has largely been due to the theoretical difficulty in testing and fitting more complex models. In recent years, the development of simulation-based modeling approaches matched with Bayesian fitting methodologies has opened the possibility of developing more complex models such as those with time-varying properties. In the present work, we discuss a piecewise variant of the well-studied diffusion decision model (termed pDDM) that allows evidence accumulation rates to change during the deliberation process. Given the complex, time-varying nature of this model, standard Bayesian parameter estimation methodologies cannot be used to fit the model. To overcome this, we apply a recently developed simulation-based, hierarchal Bayesian methodology called the probability density approximation (PDA) method. We provide an analysis of this methodology and present results of parameter recovery experiments to demonstrate the strengths and limitations of this approach. With those established, we fit pDDM to data from a perceptual experiment where information changes during the course of trials. This extensible modeling platform opens the possibility of applying sequential sampling models to a range of complex non-stationary decision tasks.

Keywords:  Evidence accumulation models; Hierarchal Bayesian inference; Non-stationary stimuli

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28597236     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0901-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  8 in total

1.  Response-time data provide critical constraints on dynamic models of multi-alternative, multi-attribute choice.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; William R Holmes; Jennifer S Trueblood
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

Review 2.  Optimal models of decision-making in dynamic environments.

Authors:  Zachary P Kilpatrick; William R Holmes; Tahra L Eissa; Krešimir Josić
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Evidence accumulation, not 'self-control', explains dorsolateral prefrontal activation during normative choice.

Authors:  Cendri A Hutcherson; Anita Tusche
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  A parameter recovery assessment of time-variant models of decision-making.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans; Jennifer S Trueblood; William R Holmes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02

5.  Attentional priorities drive effects of time pressure on altruistic choice.

Authors:  Yi Yang Teoh; Ziqing Yao; William A Cunningham; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  A method, framework, and tutorial for efficiently simulating models of decision-making.

Authors:  Nathan J Evans
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-10

7.  Conflict and competition between model-based and model-free control.

Authors:  Yuqing Lei; Alec Solway
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.779

8.  A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models.

Authors:  Maxwell Shinn; Norman H Lam; John D Murray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.