Literature DB >> 28597226

Pharmacokinetic Profile of a 2-Month Dose Regimen of Aripiprazole Lauroxil: A Phase I Study and a Population Pharmacokinetic Model.

Marjie L Hard1,2, Richard J Mills3, Brian M Sadler4, Angela Y Wehr1, Peter J Weiden1, Lisa von Moltke5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) is a long-acting injectable medication approved for the treatment of schizophrenia. Current AL regimens are 441 mg, 662 mg, and 882 mg administered monthly (every 4 weeks [q4wk]), or 882 mg administered every 6 weeks (q6wk).
OBJECTIVE: We examined the feasibility of a 2-month (every 8 weeks [q8wk]) dosing interval of AL in a phase I open-label pharmacokinetic study investigating AL 1064 mg administered q8wk for 24 weeks, followed by 20 weeks of safety and pharmacokinetic measurements (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02320032). Second, a population pharmacokinetic model (referred to as the 2MPopPK model) was generated using data collected from the present trial, as well as data obtained from earlier studies.
METHODS: The phase I study included patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder maintained on an oral antipsychotic (n = 140) who were assigned to one of three groups: AL 441 mg q4wk, AL 882 mg q6wk, or AL 1064 mg q8wk, with a total of seven, five, or four injections administered, respectively. No oral aripiprazole lead-in supplementation was administered and patients continued on maintenance oral antipsychotics. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at various time points during the 24-week study period and the 20-week follow-up period. Plasma concentrations obtained from the phase I study were analyzed using non-compartmental methods. Additionally, the data were combined with data collected from prior studies to develop the 2MPopPK model.
RESULTS: Following the final injection of AL in the phase I study, maximum aripiprazole concentrations were achieved 24.4-35.2 days after the last dose and persisted for the duration of the study. The mean C avg,ss values were 125.8 ng/ml, 131.1 ng/ml, and 140.7 ng/ml for the 441 mg q4wk, 882 mg q6wk, and 1064 mg q8wk doses, respectively. The mean elimination half-life of aripiprazole following the last dose was 53.9 days for the 1064 mg dose, 55.1 days for the 882 mg dose, and 57.2 days for the 441 mg dose. The 2MPopPK dataset included 14,524 aripiprazole concentrations from 700 patients with schizophrenia. The duration of absorption of aripiprazole was estimated as 43 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 42-45 days), which was preceded by a 3.2-day lag time (95% CI 3.0-3.5 days) for a total duration of input into the systemic circulation of 46 days following intramuscular administration of AL. Multiple-dose simulations showed that the 1064 mg q8wk regimen provides aripiprazole concentrations within the concentration range associated with 441 mg and 882 mg q4wk doses previously demonstrated to be efficacious in a phase III study.
CONCLUSION: These data from the phase I study and the 2MPopPK model support the suitability of using the AL 1064 mg dose as a 2-month (q8wk) dose interval option for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28597226      PMCID: PMC5511303          DOI: 10.1007/s40263-017-0447-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


Key Points

Introduction

Schizophrenia often requires long-term maintenance antipsychotic treatment to prevent relapse and recurrence [1]. Antipsychotic withdrawal can occur in a variety of circumstances, and even relatively brief interruptions or disruptions of medication continuity are associated with exacerbation of symptoms and an increased risk of relapse and hospitalization [2-4]. Antipsychotics are available as oral medications that need to be taken daily or as long-acting injectable formulations given at intervals ranging from every 2 weeks to every 3 months, depending on the specific long-acting agent. Aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) is an intramuscular injectable extended-release prodrug of aripiprazole that is approved for the treatment of schizophrenia [5, 6]. Pivotal clinical studies have demonstrated that AL 441 mg and 882 mg doses administered monthly (every 4 weeks [q4wk]) are efficacious [7, 8] and population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling provided the pharmacokinetic basis for the approval of the 662 mg dose q4wk and the 882 mg dose every 6 weeks (q6wk) [9]. We hypothesized that extending the AL regimens to include a dose that could support a 2-month (every 8 weeks [q8wk]) dose interval may offer additional medication regimen options. Here, we report the results from a phase I study (A105) in which AL 1064 mg was administered q8wk over the course of 24 weeks. Extensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed during the period of AL administration and for an additional 20 weeks following the last dose. A PopPK analysis was conducted using these data and previously collected AL pharmacokinetic data to further evaluate the pharmacokinetics of an AL 1064 mg dose q8wk (2MPopPK model).

Methods

Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study

The phase I open-label study (A105, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02320032) was conducted at 15 clinical sites in the USA between December 2014 and April 2016 and evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the 1064 mg q8wk regimen (two formulations with different particle sizes were included, S formulation was not pursued for further clinical development), along with two approved AL dose interval regimens (441 mg q4wk and 882 mg q6wk). Patients were clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth edition [DSM-V]) who were already stabilized on an oral antipsychotic other than aripiprazole. To isolate the pharmacokinetics of the intramuscular injections for the AL regimens, no oral aripiprazole initiation was given, and most patients continued on the same oral antipsychotic as per clinical recommendation of the investigator (see Supplemental Table 1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material [ESM] for more details, including full inclusion and exclusion criteria for the phase I study). The protocol allowed for administration of oral aripiprazole prior to randomization to ensure tolerability for patients without prior experience with aripiprazole. The study was reviewed and approved by an institutional review board and conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origins in the Declaration of Helsinki (1964), Good Clinical Practice Guidelines issued by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Federal Code of Regulations Title 21, and other applicable international and local laws and regulations. All patients provided informed written consent before entering the study. Patients who successfully completed the screening period were assigned to one of three groups: 441 mg q4wk, 882 mg q6wk, or 1064 mg q8wk, all administered by intramuscular gluteal injection. Patients were seen every 2 weeks for safety assessments and pharmacokinetic sampling but received their respective AL regimen at different scheduled intervals over the 24-week period, corresponding to a total of four, five, or seven injections of 1064 mg, 882 mg, or 441 mg, respectively. The last dose for all AL regimens was administered at the end of the 24th week, on Day 169. Patients returned to the clinic for additional study assessments, procedures, and continued pharmacokinetic sampling for 20 weeks after the last injection. Safety data from the phase I study will be reported in a separate publication [10]. Plasma concentrations and concentration–time data were evaluated for aripiprazole at regular intervals, with a maximum of 48 samples per patient taken over 309 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by non-compartmental analysis, using actual elapsed time from dosing to estimate individual plasma pharmacokinetic parameters. Calculated pharmacokinetic parameters included maximum plasma concentration (C max), average steady-state plasma concentration during multiple-dose administration (C avg,ss), half-life (t ½), and area under the curve (AUC) over the dose interval (AUC). C avg,ss was calculated as AUC ss/, where AUCss is the AUC of concentration versus time after a steady–state dose, and τ is the dosing interval.

Two-Month Population Pharmacokinetic Model

The 2MPopPK model presented here was informed by the observed pharmacokinetic data from the phase I study (A105) and the previous PopPK model [11]. In addition to this current phase I pharmacokinetic study, the dataset for the 2MPopPK model used four other studies that had also been included in the previous PopPK model [11]. These include three prior pharmacokinetic studies (002, 101, 102) and pharmacokinetic data from the pivotal efficacy study (003) (Table 2 in the ESM). Data from one study included in the earlier PopPK model (001) was not included in the 2MPopPK model because a non-commercial formulation of study drug was administered. A total of 14,524 (including 826 [6%] LLOQ]) aripiprazole concentrations from 700 patients were included in the analysis. The phase I (A105) study contributed 5077 (including 90 [2%] <LLOQ) aripiprazole concentrations from 124 patients to this analysis, whereas the prior studies provided data from 576 patients. The model was developed using non-linear mixed effect modeling, with NONMEM® program version 7.3.0. PDx-Pop version 5.1 used as the NONMEM interface. As described in the ESM, modeling proceeded first by developing a base model for which the goodness of fit was assessed by a variety of plots and computed metrics, including plots of population and individual predictions versus observations and versus time, plots of conditional/individual weighted residuals versus predictions and versus time, histograms and quartile–quartile plots of conditional/individual weighted residuals and of the η, scatter plots of η pairs and η versus modeled covariates, and plots overlaying observed and predicted values versus time. The effect of both continuous (dose, age, body weight) and categorical covariates (race, ethnicity, sex, particle size of the 1064 mg dose, cytochrome P450 [CYP]-2D6 phenotype, route of administration, dose regimen) were then assessed using a backward deletion approach. All relevant covariates were added to the model (the full model), and the backward deletion was performed to assess the relative influence of each covariate on the model by deleting it from the full model on an individual basis until a final model was identified. The final model was assessed by applying a posterior visual predictive check and by calculating the percentage of the observations outside the 90% prediction intervals. As this phase I study did not include data from oral aripiprazole co-administration, the parameters for oral administration in the 2MPopPK model were derived from estimates from the earlier PopPK model [11]. CYP2D6 polymorphisms were evaluated as described previously [11]. Consistent with the earlier PopPK model, the covariate effects of central volume of distribution (VC/F) increasing with weight (fixed at an allometric scaling value of 1.0) and lower apparent clearance (CL/F) in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers were retained (Sect. 5 in the ESM). The earlier PopPK model included aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole, whereas the 2MPopPK model was developed for aripiprazole only to ensure stability and allow for formal statistical evaluation of covariates (see Description of the Base Model in the ESM). Therefore, the 2MPopPK model contained only aripiprazole central and peripheral compartments and associated parameters (the structure of the 2MPopPK model is illustrated in Fig. 1 in the ESM). The previous PopPK model contained four intramuscular dosing compartments, one oral aripiprazole dosing compartment, and one central and one peripheral compartment each for aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole [11]. The present 2MPopPK model contained seven intramuscular dosing compartments representing the maximum number of AL doses administered, one oral aripiprazole dosing compartment, one central compartment, and one peripheral compartment for aripiprazole only. Using the 2MPopPK model, simulations were performed to predict aripiprazole concentration–time profiles after repeated administration of AL at doses of 1064 mg q8wk, relative to the approved AL regimens of 441 mg, 662 mg, and 882 mg q4wk, and 882 mg q6wk, including daily supplementation with oral aripiprazole 15 mg for 21 days with the first injection. Aripiprazole-equivalent doses of 300 mg, 450 mg, 600 mg, and 724 mg were used for modeling and simulation, which correspond to 441 mg, 662 mg, 882 mg, and 1064 mg of AL, respectively. For each set of Monte-Carlo simulations, 500 individual aripiprazole concentration–time profiles were generated.

Results

Phase I Pharmacokinetics

Of 140 patients randomized in the phase I study, 104 were included in the pharmacokinetic population. One patient enrolled in the 882 mg group withdrew consent on Day 1 and did not receive the study drug. The AL 1064 (S) mg formulation was not developed further, and therefore the 35 patients who received this formulation are not included in the analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not reportable for some subjects due to either early termination (n = 22) or sample error (n = 3). The mean patient age was 44.5 ± standard deviation (SD) 11.4 years; 73% were male, 75% were Black/African American, and mean ± SD body weight and body mass index were 89.8 ± 16.9 and 29.3 ± 4.5 kg, respectively (Table 1). Patient demographics were comparable across the treatment groups in the phase I study. Generally, safety of all doses evaluated in the phase I study was consistent with previous reports [7] and is detailed in a separate publication [12].
Table 1

Demographic and baseline characteristics of the safety population in the phase I study

Category441 mg (n = 35)882 mg (n = 34)1064 mg (n = 35)1064 (S) mga (n = 35)
Age, years46.3 ± 11.044.8 ± 12.444.9 ± 10.742.1 ± 11.5
Male sex20 (57.1)25 (73.5)29 (82.9)28 (80.0)
Ethnicity
 Not Hispanic or Latino34 (97.1)32 (94.1)31 (88.6)35 (100.0)
 Hispanic or Latino1 (2.9)2 (5.9)4 (11.4)0
Race
 Black or African American26 (74.3)25 (73.5)26 (74.3)27 (77.1)
 White9 (25.7)8 (23.5)9 (25.7)8 (22.9)
 Other01 (2.9)00
Weight, kg92.5 ± 16.488.6 ± 15.988.52 ± 18.390.1 ± 18.0
Body mass index, kg/m2 30.3 ± 4.329.3 ± 4.429.3 ± 4.428.9 ± 5.1

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation

aThe S formulation of aripiprazole lauroxil is not being developed further; data from this cohort are not presented in this manuscript

Demographic and baseline characteristics of the safety population in the phase I study Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation aThe S formulation of aripiprazole lauroxil is not being developed further; data from this cohort are not presented in this manuscript Following the final injection of AL in the phase I study, maximum aripiprazole concentrations were achieved 24.4–35.2 days after the last dose and persisted for the duration of the study (Fig. 1). The mean C avg,ss values are presented in Table 2. The mean elimination half-life of aripiprazole following the last dose ranged from 53.9 to 57.2 days for all three dose groups (Table 2).
Fig. 1

Mean (standard deviation) aripiprazole plasma concentrations in the phase I study following multiple doses of aripiprazole lauroxil administered using three dosing regimens. All aripiprazole lauroxil regimens in the clinical study were administered on Day 169. All patients were followed for 20 weeks for continued safety and pharmacokinetics assessment. AL aripiprazole lauroxil, qXwk every X weeks

Table 2

Pharmacokinetic parameters of aripiprazole determined in the phase I study following last dose by treatment group

Parametera Mean (%CV)
441 mg q4wk (n = 28)882 mg q6wk (n = 23)1064 mg q8wk (n = 28)
C max, ng/ml161 (67.8)172 (47.3)189 (42.3)
C avg,ss, ng/ml126 (63.3)131 (47.4)141 (40.7)
AUCτ, day × ng/ml3520 (63.3)5510 (47.4)7880 (40.7)
t ½, days57.2 (75.2)b 55.1 (58.0)c 53.9 (77.9)d

%CV percent coefficient of variation, AUC area under the curve over the dosing interval, C average concentration at steady state, C maximum plasma concentration, qXwk every X weeks, t half-life

aData from the phase I study, arithmetic means reported. Duration of sampling, 140 days; number of sampling days, 24 days; samples collected after Day 28, 15. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not reportable for some subjects due to either early termination (n = 22) or sample error (n = 3)

b n = 22

c n = 19

d n = 26

Mean (standard deviation) aripiprazole plasma concentrations in the phase I study following multiple doses of aripiprazole lauroxil administered using three dosing regimens. All aripiprazole lauroxil regimens in the clinical study were administered on Day 169. All patients were followed for 20 weeks for continued safety and pharmacokinetics assessment. AL aripiprazole lauroxil, qXwk every X weeks Pharmacokinetic parameters of aripiprazole determined in the phase I study following last dose by treatment group %CV percent coefficient of variation, AUC area under the curve over the dosing interval, C average concentration at steady state, C maximum plasma concentration, qXwk every X weeks, t half-life aData from the phase I study, arithmetic means reported. Duration of sampling, 140 days; number of sampling days, 24 days; samples collected after Day 28, 15. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not reportable for some subjects due to either early termination (n = 22) or sample error (n = 3) b n = 22 c n = 19 d n = 26

Two-Month Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Aripiprazole Lauroxil

Observed versus predicted aripiprazole concentrations for the 1064 mg q8wk regimen were evaluated using the model; simulations showed that more than 90% of observed aripiprazole concentrations were within the 5th and 95th percentiles of therapeutic concentration range estimated for AL. The duration of absorption of aripiprazole was estimated to be 43 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 42–45), and the lag time for the appearance of aripiprazole in the central compartment was 3.2 days (95% CI 3.0–3.5), suggesting that the total length of time that aripiprazole continues to enter the systemic circulation following a single injection is 46 days. A total of seven covariates were included in a full covariate model, including two covariates that were previously included in the PopPK model (weight on VC/F and CYP2D6 poor metabolizer status on CL/F) [11]. Of the five additional covariates analyzed (surface area on bioavailability following intramuscular administration [FIM], absorption lag time [ALAG] and input duration [D1], race and sex on CL/F), two did not have any effect (Table 3 in the ESM). These were an estimated 25% decrease in ALAG for the formulation with lower surface area and a 16% decrease in CL/F for females in comparison with males. The effect of race on CL/F and surface area on both D1 and FIM included 1.0 in the 95% CI values. The inclusion of race and sex as covariates did not result in a decrease in objective function value (OFV) and thus were not retained in the model. The final model contained the covariate effect for VC/F to increase with weight and the reduction in CL/F for CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (see additional details in the ESM [Sect. 5]).

Model Simulations

The 2MPopPK model was used to simulate aripiprazole concentration–time profiles after administration of AL in multiple-dosing regimens. The simulated pharmacokinetic parameters for AL 441 mg q4wk, 662 mg q4wk, 882 mg q4wk, and 882 mg q6wk (Table 4 in the ESM) were consistent with simulated values from the prior PopPK model [11]. In the 2MPopPK model, we performed multiple-dose simulations with 21 days of oral aripiprazole 15 mg co-administered with the first 1064 mg dose of AL (1064 mg q8wk) over 56 weeks and evaluated median aripiprazole concentrations relative to the efficacious doses established in the phase III pivotal study [7]. The repeated-dose simulations showed that a 1064 mg q8wk regimen achieved aripiprazole concentrations within the concentration range predicted for the 441 mg and 882 mg q4wk regimens (Fig. 2a). Simulated median aripiprazole concentrations for AL 441 mg, 662 mg, and 882 mg q4wk and AL 441 mg q4wk, 882 mg q4wk, and 882 mg q6wk are shown in Fig. 2b, c, respectively. The C avg,ss for the 1064 mg q8wk regimen was within the 441 mg q4wk and 882 mg q6wk dose ranges (Fig. 3; Table 4 in the ESM).
Fig. 2

Simulated median aripiprazole concentration for initiation of aripiprazole lauroxil with oral aripiprazole 15 mg for 21 days: a 1064 mg every 8 weeks vs. lowest and highest approved aripiprazole lauroxil doses. b 441 mg every 4 weeks vs. 662 mg every 4 weeks and 882 mg every 4 weeks. c 441 mg every 4 weeks vs. 882 mg every 4 weeks and 882 mg every 6 weeks. The aripiprazole concentrations between Weeks 0 and 3 reflect combined concentrations from the first aripiprazole lauroxil injection and from the daily oral aripiprazole 15 mg supplementation. qXwk every X weeks

Fig. 3

Simulated average steady-state aripiprazole concentrations: 1064 mg every 8 weeks vs. other aripiprazole lauroxil regimens. The average steady-state plasma concentration was determined after 48 weeks of dosing for all regimens. The box represents the 75th and 25th percentiles, the line within each box marks the median, the whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles, and the dots represent the 5th and 95th percentiles. C average concentration at steady state, qXwk every X weeks

Simulated median aripiprazole concentration for initiation of aripiprazole lauroxil with oral aripiprazole 15 mg for 21 days: a 1064 mg every 8 weeks vs. lowest and highest approved aripiprazole lauroxil doses. b 441 mg every 4 weeks vs. 662 mg every 4 weeks and 882 mg every 4 weeks. c 441 mg every 4 weeks vs. 882 mg every 4 weeks and 882 mg every 6 weeks. The aripiprazole concentrations between Weeks 0 and 3 reflect combined concentrations from the first aripiprazole lauroxil injection and from the daily oral aripiprazole 15 mg supplementation. qXwk every X weeks Simulated average steady-state aripiprazole concentrations: 1064 mg every 8 weeks vs. other aripiprazole lauroxil regimens. The average steady-state plasma concentration was determined after 48 weeks of dosing for all regimens. The box represents the 75th and 25th percentiles, the line within each box marks the median, the whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles, and the dots represent the 5th and 95th percentiles. C average concentration at steady state, qXwk every X weeks

Discussion

The results of the phase I study and subsequent 2MPopPK model-based evaluations presented here demonstrated that the 1064 mg q8wk regimen provided aripiprazole concentrations within the concentration range associated with 441 mg and 882 mg q4wk regimens that were previously determined to be efficacious in a phase III study [7, 9]. Data from the phase I pharmacokinetic study of 1064 mg were included in the 2MPopPK model, which was developed using the previously described PopPK model, published elsewhere, and included data from three prior phase I studies as well as a phase III study [11]. One limitation of the phase I study is that it did not include lead-in oral aripiprazole supplementation, which is necessary for initiation of AL. Therefore, predicted concentrations during initiation of 1064 mg q8wk were derived from model-based simulations alone. As the study did not include any oral aripiprazole administration, the parameters of the model associated with oral administration (first-order rate of absorption and bioavailability following intramuscular administration) were fixed to the estimates obtained from the earlier PopPK model. The mean elimination half-life of aripiprazole following the last dose ranged from 53.9 to 57.2 days, which is longer than previously reported (29.2–34.9 days) [6]. The difference is attributed to the fact that, compared with previous studies, the phase I study had a longer duration and higher density of pharmacokinetic sampling during the elimination phase, which was characterized 20 weeks after the last AL dose, and therefore provides a more accurate estimate of the half-life. Like other long-acting injectables [13], AL has a slow dissolution after injection [9] and therefore exhibits flip-flop kinetics determined by an absorption rate that is slower than the elimination rate, resulting in an extended pharmacokinetic profile. Thus, the calculated half-life using the non-compartmental analysis is substantially greater than that for oral aripiprazole and is influenced by the flip-flop kinetics. Consistent with the slow dissolution of AL that governs the release of drug, the 2MPopPK model characterized the uptake of aripiprazole after AL administration as having a 3.2-day lag time and a 43-day duration of absorption for a total duration of input into the systemic circulation of 46 days. As previously reported, AL is rapidly converted to the active metabolite with no measurable concentrations of the prodrug detected [9]. Thus, it is unlikely that the conversion rate or the volume of distribution of AL is responsible for the slow elimination of aripiprazole. These results suggest that aripiprazole concentrations increase throughout the majority of the dosing interval, explaining the ability to extend the dosing interval to q8wk. Overall, the model parameter estimates, covariate effects, and simulated exposures are consistent with the previously presented PopPK model [11]. Polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, particularly CYP2D6 status, can produce variability in aripiprazole and dehydro-aripiprazole exposure. Of 700 patients in the analysis, 25 were poor metabolizers. While the CYP2D6 covariate was retained in the model (Sect. 5 of the ESM), the overall predictions do not suggest a clinically meaningful difference in exposure to aripiprazole, and consequently dehydro-aripiprazole, in CYP2D6 poor metabolizer patients. The studies included in the 2MPopPK analysis did not include patients who were ultra-rapid CYP2D6 metabolizers; thus, no conclusions can be made for this phenotype. No other formulation of aripiprazole provides guidance for this CYP2D6 phenotype. In general, extended dosing intervals could potentially reduce the number of clinic visits, when clinically appropriate, and therefore may reduce the overall treatment burden. Additionally, more dosing options may allow clinicians to select the appropriate doses and dose intervals to fulfill the treatment needs of each patient, and may facilitate patient-oriented decision making.

Conclusion

Results from the phase I study and the 2MPopPK model demonstrate that the AL 1064 mg q8wk dose regimen provides plasma concentrations of aripiprazole that are within the ranges of the approved AL doses (441 and 882 mg). These findings support the suitability of 1064 mg AL as a regimen for the treatment of schizophrenia that is given every 2 months (q8wk). Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (PDF 485 kb)
Based on the 2MPopPK model, the 1064 mg every 8 weeks (q8wk) regimen of aripiprazole lauroxil provides concentrations within the range of approved monthly (every 4 weeks [q4wk]) doses (441 and 882 mg).
The mean elimination half-life of aripiprazole following the last dose ranged from 53.9 to 57.2 days, across the dose range of 441–1064 mg.
The pharmacokinetic characteristics of aripiprazole lauroxil include a duration of absorption of 46 days, allowing the extension of the dosing interval to 2 months (q8wk).
  11 in total

1.  Medication nonadherence and treatment outcome in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with suboptimal prior response.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Lindenmayer; Hong Liu-Seifert; Pandurang M Kulkarni; Bruce J Kinon; Virginia Stauffer; Sara E Edwards; Lei Chen; David H Adams; Haya Ascher-Svanum; Peter F Buckley; Leslie Citrome; Jan Volavka
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Aripiprazole Lauroxil (Aristada): An Extended-Release, Long-Acting Injection For the Treatment of Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Martin P Cruz
Journal:  P T       Date:  2016-09

3.  Relative bioavailability and safety of aripiprazole lauroxil, a novel once-monthly, long-acting injectable atypical antipsychotic, following deltoid and gluteal administration in adult subjects with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ryan Turncliff; Marjie Hard; Yangchun Du; Robert Risinger; Elliot W Ehrich
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  The pharmacokinetics of long-acting antipsychotic medications.

Authors:  Stefano Spanarello; Teresa La Ferla
Journal:  Curr Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014

5.  Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole lauroxil in schizophrenic patients presenting with severe psychotic symptoms during an acute exacerbation.

Authors:  Steven G Potkin; Robert Risinger; Yangchun Du; Jacqueline Zummo; Anjana Bose; Bernard Silverman; Srdjan Stankovic; Elliot Ehrich
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  A nationwide cohort study of oral and depot antipsychotics after first hospitalization for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jari Tiihonen; Jari Haukka; Mark Taylor; Peter M Haddad; Maxine X Patel; Pasi Korhonen
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aripiprazole lauroxil in acute exacerbation of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Herbert Y Meltzer; Robert Risinger; Henry A Nasrallah; Yangchun Du; Jacqueline Zummo; Lisa Corey; Anjana Bose; Srdjan Stankovic; Bernard L Silverman; Elliot W Ehrich
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Predictors of relapse following response from a first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

Authors:  D Robinson; M G Woerner; J M Alvir; R Bilder; R Goldman; S Geisler; A Koreen; B Sheitman; M Chakos; D Mayerhoff; J A Lieberman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1999-03

9.  Partial compliance and risk of rehospitalization among California Medicaid patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Peter J Weiden; Chris Kozma; Amy Grogg; Julie Locklear
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Aripiprazole Lauroxil: Pharmacokinetic Profile of This Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic in Persons With Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Marjie L Hard; Richard J Mills; Brian M Sadler; Ryan Z Turncliff; Leslie Citrome
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.153

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Aripiprazole Lauroxil: A Review in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Long-Acting Injectable Second-Generation Antipsychotics: An Update and Comparison Between Agents.

Authors:  Michael W Jann; Scott R Penzak
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  New Antipsychotic Medications in the Last Decade.

Authors:  Mehak Pahwa; Ahmad Sleem; Omar H Elsayed; Megan Elizabeth Good; Rif S El-Mallakh
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Therapeutic Reference Range for Aripiprazole in Schizophrenia Revised: a Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

Authors:  Xenia M Hart; Christoph Hiemke; Luzie Eichentopf; Xenija M Lense; Hans Willi Clement; Andreas Conca; Frank Faltraco; Vincenzo Florio; Jessica Grüner; Ursula Havemann-Reinecke; Espen Molden; Michael Paulzen; Georgios Schoretsanitis; Thomas G Riemer; Gerhard Gründer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.415

5.  Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis and Model-Based Simulations of Aripiprazole for a 1-Day Initiation Regimen for the Long-Acting Antipsychotic Aripiprazole Lauroxil.

Authors:  Marjie L Hard; Angela Y Wehr; Brian M Sadler; Richard J Mills; Lisa von Moltke
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.441

6.  Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a 2-Month Dose Interval Regimen of the Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Aripiprazole Lauroxil: Results From a 44-Week Phase I Study.

Authors:  Peter J Weiden; Yangchun Du; Lisa von Moltke; Angela Wehr; Marjie Hard; Morteza Marandi; David P Walling
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia: An Overview.

Authors:  Christoph U Correll; Edward Kim; Jennifer Kern Sliwa; Wayne Hamm; Srihari Gopal; Maju Mathews; Raja Venkatasubramanian; Stephen R Saklad
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  Aripiprazole Lauroxil, a Novel Injectable Long-Acting Antipsychotic Treatment for Adults with Schizophrenia: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Kunal Maini; Haley Gould; Jessica Hicks; Fatima Iqbal; James Patterson; Amber N Edinoff; Elyse M Cornett; Adam M Kaye; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2021-07-01

9.  Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of a 1-Day Treatment Initiation Option for Starting Long-Acting Aripiprazole Lauroxil for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Marjie L Hard; Angela Y Wehr; Yangchun Du; Peter J Weiden; David Walling; Lisa von Moltke
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.153

10.  Relationship between the timing of relapse and plasma drug levels following discontinuation of cariprazine treatment in patients with schizophrenia: indirect comparison with other second-generation antipsychotics after treatment discontinuation.

Authors:  Christoph U Correll; Rakesh Jain; Jonathan M Meyer; Antonia Periclou; Timothy Carrothers; Ágota Barabássy; Mehul Patel; Willie Earley
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.