| Literature DB >> 28596531 |
Gang Yin1, Heather T Stephenson2, Junhao Yang2, Xiaofan Li2, Stephanie M Armstrong2, Tyler H Heibeck2, Cuong Tran2, Mary Rose Masikat2, Sihong Zhou2, Ryan L Stafford2, Alice Y Yam2, John Lee2, Alexander R Steiner2, Avinash Gill2, Kalyani Penta2, Sonia Pollitt2, Ramesh Baliga2, Christopher J Murray2, Christopher D Thanos2, Leslie M McEvoy2, Aaron K Sato2, Trevor J Hallam3.
Abstract
Amber codon suppression for the insertion of non-natural amino acids (nnAAs) is limited by competition with release factor 1 (RF1). Here we describe the genome engineering of a RF1 mutant strain that enhances suppression efficiency during cell-free protein synthesis, without significantly impacting cell growth during biomass production. Specifically, an out membrane protease (OmpT) cleavage site was engineered into the switch loop of RF1, which enables its conditional inactivation during cell lysis. This facilitates extract production without additional processing steps, resulting in a scaleable extract production process. The RF1 mutant extract allows nnAA incorporation at previously intractable sites of an IgG1 and at multiple sites in the same polypeptide chain. Conjugation of cytotoxic agents to these nnAAs, yields homogeneous antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) that can be optimized for conjugation site, drug to antibody ratio (DAR) and linker-warheads designed for efficient tumor killing. This platform provides the means to generate therapeutic ADCs inaccessible by other methods that are efficient in their cytotoxin delivery to tumor with reduced dose-limiting toxicities and thus have the potential for better clinical impact.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28596531 PMCID: PMC5465077 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03192-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1TAG suppression efficiency in RF1WT extract varies with site. (a) Suppression efficiency of the amber (TAG) codon at the sites in heavy chain substituted with pAMF declines in general from N- to C-terminus in RF1WT extract. The suppression efficiency at a site is calculated as a percentage of unsubstituted HC band intensity in a 14C reducing autoradiography. (b) Suppression efficiency of the TAG codon in the light chain is unpredictable and many sites are intractable in RF1WT extract. (c) 12 sites in HC with very low suppression efficiency in RF1WT extract are shown on non-reducing autoradiography. IgG yields were extremely low in the RF1WT extract due to chain truncation. (d) The same 12 sites as in panel b are shown in reducing autoradiography.
Figure 2Engineering a contionally inactive RF1MUT strain. (a) OmpT protease is sequestered on the cell surface preventing cleavage of RF1MUT which allows normal cell growth during fermentation. During extract production, cell lysis exposes OmpT to intracellular proteins which cleaves and inactivates the engineered RF1MUT. (b) The initial mutations (bold) made to RF1 are highlighted on the RF2 crystal structure (PDB code 1GQE; cartoon model; RF2 residues in parenthesis). Though the RF1 structure was available (PDB code 2B3T), the RF2 structure was used since it has an ordered switch loop and ~40% identity to RF1. Non-conserved sites adjacent to basic residues were chosen for point mutations which enables incorporation of canonical dibasic OmpT cleavage sites with minimal change to the native RF1 sequence and activity. (c) The designed RF1 mutants were expressed in small-scale cell-free reactions to screen for proteolytic susceptibility. Only the N296K mutant in the switch loop showed OmpT sensitivity. (I = intact; C = cleaved) (d) To improve proteolytic cleavage upon cell-lysis, additional basic residues were added to the switch loop of the N296K mutant. Cell-free reactions were run in OmpT+ and OmpT− extract to demonstrate that proteolysis is dependent on OmpT. (I = intact; C = cleaved) (e) Three separate genomic RF1 mutants were engineered using OMAR starting from parent strain SBJY001 (RF1WT). A Western blot shows RF1 cleavage occurs during extract production immediately after cell lysis for each mutant strain. No RF1 cleavage is observed in the SBJY001. (P = cell pellet after fermentation, L = cell lysis, C = extract clarification by centrifugation, and 1–3 = incubation time in hours after clarification).
Figure 3RF1 mutant extract improves nnAA incorporation. (a,b) The amber suppression efficiency increases in HC and LC across most sites in the RF1 mutant extract. (c) The non reducing autoradiography shows the efficient incorporation of pAMF at previously intractable sites using the RF1MUT extract. (d) The reducing autoradiography indicates the suppression efficiency of amber codon in RF1MUT is greatly improved with minimal truncation products. (e) RF1 mutant extract enables incorporation of multiple nnAAs. No increase in truncation prodcts was observed and up to 3nnAAs were incorporated with little loss in expression titer as compared to WT trastuzmab. 1 nnAA = F404, 2 nnAA = F404 + Y180, 3 nnAA = F404 + Y180 + A118, 4 nnAA = F404, Y180, A118, V5, all sites are on HC.
Figure 4Site-specific ADCs cell binding, cell killing, and plasma stability. (a) Cell binding of four site-specific ADCs. All ADCs show similar in vitro cell binding to Her2 + SKBR3. (b) Cell killing of four site-specific ADCs. All ADCs show similar cell killing activities to Her2 + SKBR3. (c) Pharmacokinetics of four site-specific ADCs. Beige nude XID mice were dosed with 2–5 mg/kg of conjugate and plasma samples were collected and analyzed by Her2 ECD ELISA to determine total antibody concentrations over time. (d) Drug-linker stability was assessed by LC-MS. (e) Structures of DBCO-MMAF drugs-linkers. AB4285 is a methylated derivative of AB3627. (f) Site-specific ADCs in vivo efficacy. KPL-4 orthoptic Beige nude xid mice tumor models. Animals were dosed with a single i.v. injection of trastuzumab-DBCO MMAF site specific ADCs (15 mg/kg, n = 10 mice per group) and tumor growth was monitored over 60 days. Transient regression followed by tumor regrowth after single treatment was site dependent. Efficacy was compared with unconjugated trastuzumab control produced in cell free (S136 mAb), vehicle (PBS) and drug-linker at equivalent dose. Multiple dosed glycosylated, CHO-produced trastuzumab served as a positive control.
DAR, SKBR3 cell binding Kd, cell killing IC50 and melting temperature (Tm) of ADC variants.
| Samples | DAR by LC/MS | SKBR3 cell binding, Kd (nM) | SKBR3 cell killing, IC50 (nM) | Ab only | ADC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tm1 °C | Tm2 °C | Tm1 °C | Tm2 °C | |||||
| Trastuzumab (CHO) | — | 2 | — | 61.5 | 76.8 | — | — | |
| TrastuzumabCF MMAF (AB4285) | LC-S7 | 1.85 | 7.6 | 0.11 | 62.0 | 76.9 | 60.7 | 76.2 |
| HC-S136 | 1.84 | 4.7 | 0.15 | 61.4 | 76.7 | 61.1 | 76.3 | |
| HC-R355 | 1.97 | 5.6 | 0.12 | |||||
| HC-N389 | 1.96 | 7.2 | 0.13 | |||||
| HC-F404 | 1.97 | 2.4 | 0.17 | 61.2 | 76.6 | 63.5 | 76.5 | |
| TrastuzumabCF Maytansine (SC-236) | HC-F404 | 1.77 | n/a | 0.051 | 61.2 | 76.6 | n/a | n/a |
| HC-F404 Y180 | 3.83 | n/a | 0.031 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
| HC-F404 Y180 A118 | 5.82 | n/a | 0.051 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
| HC-F404 Y180 A118 V5 | 7.43 | n/a | 0.084 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |
Figure 5Improved potency by increasing ADC DAR. ADCs withs DAR 2, 4, 6 and 8 (see Table 1 for positional combination variants) were tested on SKBR3 (1.25 K cells), BT474 (1.875 cells), MDA-MB-45 (1.875 cells), JIMT1 (1.25 K cells) and MDA-MB-468 (1.875 K cells) lines (5 day treatment). ADCs with different DARs showed similar cell killing activites on high Her2 SKBR3 cells. DAR 2 ADC showed less killing activity on moderate Her2 BT474 and MDA-MB-453 cells, while DAR 4, 6, 8 ADCs showed similar cell killing activities. The cell killing activites with different DARs differentiate on Her2 low JIMT1 cells. No cell killing activiy was observed on Her2 negative MDA-MB-468 cells.
Oligos for RF1 strain construction.
| Oligo name | Oligo Sequence (5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|
| 1opRF1 KR (OMAR) | GGGAAGTTGTAAGTACGGTTACGGTCGCTGCGATCcCCtgaaCCaAGacGcTTtCGACGGGTAGACGCTTCGGCCTGTTGGCGTTTTGCC |
| 1opRF1 KRR (OMAR) | GGGAAGTTGTAAGTACGGTTACGGTCGCTGCGATCcCCtgaaCCacgacGcTTtCGACGGGTAGACGCTTCGGCCTGTTGGCGTTTTGCC |
| 1opRF1 KRK (OMAR) | GGGAAGTTGTAAGTACGGTTACGGTCGCTGCGATCcCCtgaaCCcttacGcTTtCGACGGGTAGACGCTTCGGCCTGTTGGCGTTTTGCC |
| 3KR op-PCR (MAMA) | GCG ATC CCC TGA ACC AAG ACG C |
| 3 KRR op-PCR (MAMA) | CGATCcCCtgaaCCacgacGc |
| 3KRK op-PCR (MAMA) | TGCGATCcCCtgaaCCcttacGc |
| 5 RF1 op-PCR (MAMA) | CGTGACGGGGATAACGAACGCC |