Literature DB >> 28596085

Brief hyperopic defocus or form deprivation have varying effects on eye growth and ocular rhythms depending on the time-of-day of exposure.

Debora L Nickla1, Kelsey Jordan2, Jane Yang2, Kristen Totonelly2.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that myopic defocus is a more potent signal to the emmetropization system than hyperopic defocus: one hour per day of myopic defocus cancels out 11 h of hyperopic defocus. However, we have recently shown that the potency of brief episodes of myopic defocus at inhibiting eye growth depends on the time of day of exposure. We here ask if this will also be true of the responses to brief periods of hyperopic defocus: may integration of the signal depend on time of day? If so, are the rhythms in axial length and choroidal thickness altered? Hyperopic defocus: Birds had one eye exposed to hyperopic defocus by the wearing of -10D lenses for 2 or 6 h at one of 3 times of day for 5 days: Morning (7 am - 9 am: n = 13; 7 am - 1 pm: n = 6), Mid-day (12 pm - 2 pm: n = 20; 10 am - 4 pm: n = 8), or Evening (7 pm - 9 pm: n = 12; 2 pm - 8 pm: n = 11). A separate group wore monocular lenses continually as a control (n = 12). Form deprivation: Birds wore a diffuser over one eye for 2 h at one of 3 times of day for 5 days: Morning (n = 12); Mid-day (n = 19) or Evening (n = 6). For all groups, ocular dimensions were measured using high-frequency A-scan ultrasonography at noon on the first day, under inhalation anesthesia. On day 5, eye dimensions were re-measured at 12 pm, and refractive errors were measured using a Hartinger's refractometer. A subset of birds in the 2-h lens group (morning, n = 8; mid-day, n = 8; evening, n = 6), and the deprivation group (n = 6 per time point), were also measured at 6 pm, 12 am, 6 am and 12 pm on the last day of exposure, to obtain the parameters of the diurnal rhythms in axial length and choroidal thickness. The effects of 2 h of defocus depended on time of day of exposure: it stimulated eye growth when exposure was in the morning and inhibited it when it was at mid-day (change in vitreous chamber, X-C; ANOVA p < 0.0005; 120 μm vs -77 μm/5d, respectively; t-tests: p = 0.001; p = 0.01; post-hoc tests: p = 0.002). For mid-day, experimental eyes were more hyperopic (1.4 D; p < 0.0001). Similar to 2 h defocus, 6 h exposures at mid-day inhibited growth and produced hyperopia (X-C: -167 μm; t-test p = 0.005; RE: 1.8 D; p = 0.03). The effects of 2 h of FD were similar to those of hyperopic defocus in inhibiting growth for mid-day exposures, but FD inhibited growth for the morning exposures as well (Axial length: X-C: Morning: -122 μm; mid-day: -92 μm; ttests p = 0.006 and p = 0.016 respectively). Experimental eyes were more hyperopic (1.8 D; 1.0 D; p < 0.05). The rhythms in axial length were altered for the morning exposures in both conditions. Form deprivation in the morning, which caused inhibition, caused the phases of the two rhythms to shift toward one another (peaks at 6:00 am and 10:45 am for choroid and axial length respectively). Our findings imply that the retinal "integrator", and/or scleral growth regulator exhibit diurnal rhythms. Furthermore, they suggest that reading activities early in the day may be contraindicated in school children at risk of becoming myopic.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axial length; Choroid; Circadian; Defocus; Form-deprivation; Hyperopic; Myopia; Rhythms

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28596085      PMCID: PMC5557081          DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  24 in total

1.  Diurnal axial length fluctuations in human eyes.

Authors:  Richard A Stone; Graham E Quinn; Ellie L Francis; Gui-shuang Ying; D Ian Flitcroft; Parag Parekh; Jamin Brown; Joshua Orlow; Gregor Schmid
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia.

Authors:  Josh Wallman; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Diurnal variations in axial length, choroidal thickness, intraocular pressure, and ocular biometrics.

Authors:  Ranjay Chakraborty; Scott A Read; Michael J Collins
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes.

Authors:  D L Nickla; C Wildsoet; J Wallman
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  The effect of an interrupted daily period of normal visual stimulation on form deprivation myopia in chicks.

Authors:  G A Napper; N A Brennan; M Barrington; M A Squires; G A Vessey; A J Vingrys
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children.

Authors:  J Gwiazda; J Bauer; F Thorn; R Held
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000.

Authors:  L L K Lin; Y F Shih; C K Hsiao; C J Chen
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.473

8.  Incidence of myopia in high school students with and without red-green color vision deficiency.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Qian; Ren-Yuan Chu; Ji C He; Xing-Huai Sun; Xing-Tao Zhou; Nai-Qing Zhao; Dan-Ning Hu; Matthew R Hoffman; Jin-Hui Dai; Xiao-Mei Qu; Kristina E Yi-Hwa Pao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Changes in refractive trends and optical components of Hong Kong Chinese aged 19-39 years.

Authors:  W S Goh; C S Lam
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Potency of myopic defocus in spectacle lens compensation.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhu; Jonathan A Winawer; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of morning and evening exposures to blue light of varying illuminance on ocular growth rates and ocular rhythms in chicks.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Frances Rucker; Christopher P Taylor; Shanta Sarfare; William Chen; Jonathan Elin-Calcador; Xia Wang
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 2.  Circadian rhythms, refractive development, and myopia.

Authors:  Ranjay Chakraborty; Lisa A Ostrin; Debora L Nickla; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue; Richard A Stone
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The effects of brief high intensity light on ocular growth in chicks developing myopia vary with time of day.

Authors:  Shanta Sarfare; Jane Yang; Debora L Nickla
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.770

4.  Daily morning light therapy is associated with an increase in choroidal thickness in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Scott A Read; Emily C Pieterse; David Alonso-Caneiro; Rebekah Bormann; Seentinie Hong; Chai-Hoon Lo; Rhiannon Richer; Atif Syed; Linda Tran
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Regional Distribution of Choroidal Thickness and Diurnal Variation in Choroidal Thickness and Axial Length in Young Adults.

Authors:  Muteb Alanazi; Patrick Caroline; Amane Alshamrani; Turki Alanazi; Maria Liu
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 6.  Light and myopia: from epidemiological studies to neurobiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Arumugam R Muralidharan; Carla Lança; Sayantan Biswas; Veluchamy A Barathi; Low Wan Yu Shermaine; Saw Seang-Mei; Dan Milea; Raymond P Najjar
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-19

7.  Analysis of choroidal structure and vascularity indices with image binarization of swept source optical coherence tomography images: A prospective study of 460 eyes.

Authors:  Pukhraj Rishi; Zeeshan Akhtar; Rupesh Agrawal; Ashutosh Agrawal; Ekta Rishi
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-02

8.  Genome-wide analysis of retinal transcriptome reveals common genetic network underlying perception of contrast and optical defocus detection.

Authors:  Tatiana V Tkatchenko; Andrei V Tkatchenko
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Dim Light Exposure and Myopia in Children.

Authors:  Erica G Landis; Victoria Yang; Dillon M Brown; Machelle T Pardue; Scott A Read
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.