Literature DB >> 28595317

Relative Fundamental Frequency Distinguishes Between Phonotraumatic and Non-Phonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction.

Elizabeth S Heller Murray1, Yu-An S Lien2, Jarrad H Van Stan3, Daryush D Mehta3, Robert E Hillman3, J Pieter Noordzij4, Cara E Stepp5.   

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to examine the ability of an acoustic measure, relative fundamental frequency (RFF), to distinguish between two subtypes of vocal hyperfunction (VH): phonotraumatic (PVH) and non-phonotraumatic (NPVH). Method: RFF values were compared among control individuals with typical voices (N = 49), individuals with PVH (N = 54), and individuals with NPVH (N = 35).
Results: Offset Cycle 10 RFF differed significantly among all 3 groups with values progressively decreasing for controls, individuals with NPVH, and individuals with PVH. Individuals with PVH also had lower Offset Cycles 8 and 9 relative to the other 2 groups and lower RFF values for Offset Cycle 7 relative to controls. There was also a trend for lower Onset Cycle 1 RFF values for the PVH group compared with the NPVH group. Conclusions: RFF values were significantly different between controls and individuals with VH and also between the two subtypes of VH. This study adds further support to the notion that the differences between these two subsets of VH may be functional as well as structural.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28595317      PMCID: PMC5544410          DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  31 in total

1.  Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia.

Authors:  F L Wuyts; M S De Bodt; P H Van de Heyning
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Anterior-posterior and medial compression of the supraglottis: signs of nonorganic dysphonia or normal postures?

Authors:  Alison Behrman; Linda D Dahl; Allan L Abramson; Harm K Schutte
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Incidence of supraglottic activity in males and females: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sheila V Stager; Rebecca Neubert; Susan Miller; Joan Roddy Regnell; Steven A Bielamowicz
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.

Authors:  Gail B Kempster; Bruce R Gerratt; Katherine Verdolini Abbott; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 5.  Personality traits and psychological factors in voice pathology: a foundation for future research.

Authors:  N Roy; D M Bless
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control.

Authors:  A Löfqvist; T Baer; N S McGarr; R S Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The relationship between perception of vocal effort and relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Devon E Sawin; Tanya L Eadie
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The Relationship Between Relative Fundamental Frequency and a Kinematic Estimate of Laryngeal Stiffness in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Yu-An S Lien; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Mara Kapsner; Juli Rosenzweig; Patricia Waugh; Allen Hillel; Albert Merati
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Acoustic correlate of vocal effort in spasmodic dysphonia.

Authors:  Tanya L Eadie; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  18 in total

1.  Relative Fundamental Frequency in Children With and Without Vocal Fold Nodules.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Roxanne K Segina; Geralyn Harvey Woodnorth; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Test-Retest Reliability of Relative Fundamental Frequency and Conventional Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Perceptual Measures in Individuals With Healthy Voices.

Authors:  Yeonggwang Park; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Voice Onset Time in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders: Evidence for Disordered Vocal Motor Control.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Jennifer A Hylkema; Monique C Tardif; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Validation of an Algorithm for Semi-automated Estimation of Voice Relative Fundamental Frequency.

Authors:  Yu-An S Lien; Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Carolyn R Calabrese; Carolyn M Michener; Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman; J Pieter Noordzij; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Acoustic Model of Perceived Overall Severity of Dysphonia in Adductor-Type Laryngeal Dystonia.

Authors:  Daniel P Buckley; Manuel Diaz Cadiz; Tanya L Eadie; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Perceptual and Acoustic Assessment of Strain Using Synthetically Modified Voice Samples.

Authors:  Yeonggwang Park; Manuel Díaz Cádiz; Kathleen F Nagle; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Automated Relative Fundamental Frequency Algorithms for Use With Neck-Surface Accelerometer Signals.

Authors:  Matti D Groll; Jennifer M Vojtech; Surbhi Hablani; Daryush D Mehta; Daniel P Buckley; J Pieter Noordzij; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Impact of Face Masks on Speech Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Courtney L Kendall; Tulsi H Patel; Rebecca J Howell; Renee L Gustin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Physics of phonation offset: Towards understanding relative fundamental frequency observations.

Authors:  Mohamed A Serry; Cara E Stepp; Sean D Peterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.