Literature DB >> 28594779

Clinical Validation of a Test for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis.

Charlotte A Gaydos1, Sajo Beqaj, Jane R Schwebke, Joel Lebed, Bonnie Smith, Thomas E Davis, Kenneth H Fife, Paul Nyirjesy, Timothy Spurrell, Dorothy Furgerson, Jenell Coleman, Sonia Paradis, Charles K Cooper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Vaginitis may be diagnosed as bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis, or coinfection. A new molecular test assays the vaginal microbiome and organisms that cause three common infections. The objective of the trial was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the investigational test for vaginal swabs collected by patients (self) or clinicians. The primary and secondary outcomes were to compare the investigational test with reference methods for the three most common causes of vaginitis and compare clinician-collected with self-collected swabs.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in which women with symptoms of vaginitis were recruited at ten clinical centers and consented to the investigation between May and September 2015. The woman collected a vaginal swab, sheathed, and then handed it to the clinician. These swabs were to evaluate how self-collected swabs compared with clinician-collected swabs. The clinician collected an investigational test swab and reference test swabs. From 1,740 symptomatic patients, clinician-collected and self-collected vaginal swabs were evaluated by the molecular test and six tests. The reference methods for bacterial vaginosis were Nugent's score and Amsel's criteria for intermediate Nugent results. The reference methods for Candida infection were isolation of any potential Candida microorganisms from inoculation of two culture media: chromogenic and Sabouraud agar and sequencing. The reference methods for trichomoniasis were wet mount and culture.
RESULTS: For clinician-collected swabs, by reference methods, bacterial vaginosis was diagnosed in 56.5%, vaginal candidiasis in 32.8%, trichomoniasis in 8%, and none of the three infections in 24% with a coinfection rate of 20%. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.3-92.2%) and specificity was 85.8% (95% CI 83.0-88.3%) for bacterial vaginosis. The investigational test sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI 88.1-93.1%) and specificity was 94.1% (95% CI 92.6-95.4%) for the Candida group. Sensitivity for Candida glabrata was 75.9% (95% CI 57.9-87.8%) and specificity was 99.7% (95% CI 99.3-99.9%). Investigational test sensitivity was 93.1% (95% CI 87.4-96.3%) and specificity was 99.3% (95% CI 98.7-99.6%) for trichomoniasis. Results from self-collected swabs were similar to clinician-collected swabs.
CONCLUSION: A molecular-based test using vaginal swabs collected by clinicians or patients can accurately diagnose most common bacterial, fungal, and protozoan causes of vaginitis. Women and their clinicians seeking accurate diagnosis and appropriate selection of efficacious treatment for symptoms of vaginitis might benefit from this molecular test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28594779      PMCID: PMC5635603          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  24 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  Rebecca M Brotman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  J R Schwebke; S L Hillier; J D Sobel; J A McGregor; R L Sweet
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Molecular testing for Trichomonas vaginalis in women: results from a prospective U.S. clinical trial.

Authors:  Jane R Schwebke; Marcia M Hobbs; Stephanie N Taylor; Arlene C Sena; Michael G Catania; Barbara S Weinbaum; Ann D Johnson; Damon K Getman; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species causing vulvovaginitis and epidemiology of recurrent cases.

Authors:  Sandra S Richter; Rudolph P Galask; Shawn A Messer; Richard J Hollis; Daniel J Diekema; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.

Authors:  R Amsel; P A Totten; C A Spiegel; K C Chen; D Eschenbach; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001-2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health.

Authors:  Emilia H Koumans; Maya Sternberg; Carol Bruce; Geraldine McQuillan; Juliette Kendrick; Madeline Sutton; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Bacterial communities in women with bacterial vaginosis: high resolution phylogenetic analyses reveal relationships of microbiota to clinical criteria.

Authors:  Sujatha Srinivasan; Noah G Hoffman; Martin T Morgan; Frederick A Matsen; Tina L Fiedler; Robert W Hall; Frederick J Ross; Connor O McCoy; Roger Bumgarner; Jeanne M Marrazzo; David N Fredricks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Identification of Candida species associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis by multiplex PCR.

Authors:  Mahnaz Mahmoudi Rad; Ameneh Sh Zafarghandi; Maryam Amel Zabihi; Mahkam Tavallaee; Yasaman Mirdamadi
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06-26

10.  Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota.

Authors:  Deirdre E O'Hanlon; Thomas R Moench; Richard A Cone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  24 in total

1.  Using Innovation to Address Adolescent and Young Adult Health Disparities in Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Design of the Technology Enhanced Community Health Precision Nursing (TECH-PN) Trial.

Authors:  Maria Trent; Jamie Perin; Julia Rowell; Maunank Shah; Jennifer Anders; Pamela Matson; Rebecca M Brotman; Jacques Ravel; Phyllis Sharps; Richard Rothman; Hasiya E Yusuf; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 7.759

Review 2.  Molecular Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis: an Update.

Authors:  Jenell S Coleman; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Accuracy of the BD MAX™ vaginal panel in the diagnosis of infectious vaginitis.

Authors:  Amaia Aguirre-Quiñonero; I Sáez de Castillo-Sedano; F Calvo-Muro; A Canut-Blasco
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Deep Neural Networks Offer Morphologic Classification and Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis.

Authors:  Zhongxiao Wang; Lei Zhang; Min Zhao; Ying Wang; Huihui Bai; Yufeng Wang; Can Rui; Chong Fan; Jiao Li; Na Li; Xinhuan Liu; Zitao Wang; Yanyan Si; Andrea Feng; Mingxuan Li; Qiongqiong Zhang; Zhe Yang; Mengdi Wang; Wei Wu; Yang Cao; Lin Qi; Xin Zeng; Li Geng; Ruifang An; Ping Li; Zhaohui Liu; Qiao Qiao; Weipei Zhu; Weike Mo; Qinping Liao; Wei Xu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Asymptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis: To Treat or Not to Treat?

Authors:  Christina A Muzny; Jane R Schwebke
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  The Evolving Facets of Bacterial Vaginosis: Implications for HIV Transmission.

Authors:  Lyle R McKinnon; Sharon L Achilles; Catriona S Bradshaw; Adam Burgener; Tania Crucitti; David N Fredricks; Heather B Jaspan; Rupert Kaul; Charu Kaushic; Nichole Klatt; Douglas S Kwon; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Lindi Masson; R Scott McClelland; Jacques Ravel; Janneke H H M van de Wijgert; Lenka A Vodstrcil; Gilda Tachedjian
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.205

7.  Health care utilization and costs following amplified versus non-amplified molecular probe testing for symptomatic patients with suspected vulvovaginitis: a US commercial payer population.

Authors:  Stacey J Ackerman; Tyler Knight; Peter M Wahl; Charles P Cartwright
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-02-20

8.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Vaginal Discharge Syndromes in Community Practice Settings.

Authors:  Sharon L Hillier; Michele Austin; Ingrid Macio; Leslie A Meyn; David Badway; Richard Beigi
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 9.  Host-vaginal microbiota interactions in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Christina A Muzny; Paweł Łaniewski; Jane R Schwebke; Melissa M Herbst-Kralovetz
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.968

10.  Diagnostic Performance of a Molecular Test versus Clinician Assessment of Vaginitis.

Authors:  Jane R Schwebke; Charlotte A Gaydos; Paul Nyirjesy; Sonia Paradis; Salma Kodsi; Charles K Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.