Literature DB >> 8841221

Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

J R Schwebke1, S L Hillier, J D Sobel, J A McGregor, R L Sweet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of vaginal Gram stain as interpreted by the Nugent criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, and to consider the use of Gram stain as the criterion standard for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
METHODS: A multicenter study was conducted of women attending gynecology or sexually transmitted disease clinics. Clinical data consisting of vaginal pH, "whiff test," clue cells, and appearance of the vaginal discharge (Amsel criteria) were compared with the vaginal fluid Gram stain (Nugent criteria) for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the Gram stain compared with the Amsel criteria were 89 and 83%, respectively. There was significant variation in the specificity values by geographic site. If the Gram stain was considered the criterion standard for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, the sensitivity and specificity of the Amsel criteria were 70 and 94%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The vaginal Gram stain (Nugent criteria) is a sensitive method for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. The 83% specificity suggests that the currently used Amsel criteria may lead to the underdiagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8841221     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00233-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  72 in total

1.  Risk and prevalence of treatable sexually transmitted diseases at a Birmingham substance abuse treatment facility.

Authors:  L H Bachmann; I Lewis; R Allen; J R Schwebke; L C Leviton; H A Siegal; E W Hook
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The microbiota of the vagina and its influence on women's health and disease.

Authors:  David H Martin
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.378

3.  Bacterial Vaginosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Impact of measurement error in the study of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  L Myer; C Morroni; B G Link
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Acceptability of a self-sampling technique to collect vaginal smears for gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Boskey; Shelly A Atherly-Trim; Patricia J O'Campo; Donna M Strobino; Dawn P Misra; P Misra
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections: an epidemiologic perspective.

Authors:  Rebecca M Brotman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Cytology in the differential diagnosis of vaginitis.

Authors:  Graeme J Dennerstein
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Relative performance of three methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy.

Authors:  Vijaya K Hogan; Jennifer F Culhane; Jane Hitti; Virginia A Rauh; Kelly F McCollum; Kathy J Agnew
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-09-15

9.  BVBlue test for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Linda Myziuk; Barbara Romanowski; Stephen C Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Assessment of two alternative sample transport and fixation methods in the microbiological diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Erica Eason; Baldwin Toye; George A Wells; Mary Senterman
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.