Literature DB >> 28593963

Accelerated discovery of two crystal structure types in a complex inorganic phase field.

C Collins1, M S Dyer1, M J Pitcher1, G F S Whitehead1, M Zanella1, P Mandal1, J B Claridge1, G R Darling1, M J Rosseinsky1.   

Abstract

The discovery of new materials is hampered by the lack of efficient approaches to the exploration of both the large number of possible elemental compositions for such materials, and of the candidate structures at each composition. For example, the discovery of inorganic extended solid structures has relied on knowledge of crystal chemistry coupled with time-consuming materials synthesis with systematically varied elemental ratios. Computational methods have been developed to guide synthesis by predicting structures at specific compositions and predicting compositions for known crystal structures, with notable successes. However, the challenge of finding qualitatively new, experimentally realizable compounds, with crystal structures where the unit cell and the atom positions within it differ from known structures, remains for compositionally complex systems. Many valuable properties arise from substitution into known crystal structures, but materials discovery using this approach alone risks both missing best-in-class performance and attempting design with incomplete knowledge. Here we report the experimental discovery of two structure types by computational identification of the region of a complex inorganic phase field that contains them. This is achieved by computing probe structures that capture the chemical and structural diversity of the system and whose energies can be ranked against combinations of currently known materials. Subsequent experimental exploration of the lowest-energy regions of the computed phase diagram affords two materials with previously unreported crystal structures featuring unusual structural motifs. This approach will accelerate the systematic discovery of new materials in complex compositional spaces by efficiently guiding synthesis and enhancing the predictive power of the computational tools through expansion of the knowledge base underpinning them.

Year:  2017        PMID: 28593963     DOI: 10.1038/nature22374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  20 in total

1.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  A concept for synthesis planning in solid-state chemistry.

Authors:  Martin Jansen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Crystal structure prediction from first principles.

Authors:  Scott M Woodley; Richard Catlow
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 43.841

4.  Atomistic simulation of ionic and electronic defects in YBa2Cu3O7.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1988-12-01

5.  Prediction and accelerated laboratory discovery of previously unknown 18-electron ABX compounds.

Authors:  Romain Gautier; Xiuwen Zhang; Linhua Hu; Liping Yu; Yuyuan Lin; Tor O L Sunde; Danbee Chon; Kenneth R Poeppelmeier; Alex Zunger
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 24.427

6.  Computationally assisted identification of functional inorganic materials.

Authors:  Matthew S Dyer; Christopher Collins; Darren Hodgeman; Philip A Chater; Antoine Demont; Simon Romani; Ruth Sayers; Michael F Thomas; John B Claridge; George R Darling; Matthew J Rosseinsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Crystallography with powders.

Authors:  Anthony K Cheetham; Andrew L Goodwin
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 43.841

8.  Synthesis, computed stability, and crystal structure of a new family of inorganic compounds: carbonophosphates.

Authors:  Hailong Chen; Geoffroy Hautier; Gerbrand Ceder
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

10.  How can Databases assist with the Prediction of Chemical Compounds?

Authors:  J Christian Schön
Journal:  Z Anorg Allg Chem       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.492

View more
  6 in total

1.  The structural science of functional materials.

Authors:  C Richard A Catlow
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.769

Review 2.  Toward Glycomaterials with Selectivity as Well as Affinity.

Authors:  Sarah-Jane Richards; Matthew I Gibson
Journal:  JACS Au       Date:  2021-10-11

3.  Ammonia dimer: extremely fluxional but still hydrogen bonded.

Authors:  Aling Jing; Krzysztof Szalewicz; Ad van der Avoird
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Computational modelling as a tool in structural science.

Authors:  C Richard A Catlow
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 4.769

5.  Computationally Guided Discovery of the Sulfide Li3AlS3 in the Li-Al-S Phase Field: Structure and Lithium Conductivity.

Authors:  Jacinthe Gamon; Benjamin B Duff; Matthew S Dyer; Christopher Collins; Luke M Daniels; T Wesley Surta; Paul M Sharp; Michael W Gaultois; Frédéric Blanc; John Bleddyn Claridge; Matthew J Rosseinsky
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 9.811

6.  The Role of Machine Learning in the Understanding and Design of Materials.

Authors:  Seyed Mohamad Moosavi; Kevin Maik Jablonka; Berend Smit
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 15.419

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.