Literature DB >> 28593915

Analytical performance specifications for external quality assessment - definitions and descriptions.

Graham R D Jones1, Stephanie Albarede2, Dagmar Kesseler2, Finlay MacKenzie2, Joy Mammen2, Morten Pedersen2, Anne Stavelin2, Marc Thelen2, Annette Thomas2, Patrick J Twomey2, Emma Ventura2, Mauro Panteghini2.   

Abstract

External Quality Assurance (EQA) is vital to ensure acceptable analytical quality in medical laboratories. A key component of an EQA scheme is an analytical performance specification (APS) for each measurand that a laboratory can use to assess the extent of deviation of the obtained results from the target value. A consensus conference held in Milan in 2014 has proposed three models to set APS and these can be applied to setting APS for EQA. A goal arising from this conference is the harmonisation of EQA APS between different schemes to deliver consistent quality messages to laboratories irrespective of location and the choice of EQA provider. At this time there are wide differences in the APS used in different EQA schemes for the same measurands. Contributing factors to this variation are that the APS in different schemes are established using different criteria, applied to different types of data (e.g. single data points, multiple data points), used for different goals (e.g. improvement of analytical quality; licensing), and with the aim of eliciting different responses from participants. This paper provides recommendations from the European Federation of Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Task and Finish Group on Performance Specifications for External Quality Assurance Schemes (TFG-APSEQA) and on clear terminology for EQA APS. The recommended terminology covers six elements required to understand APS: 1) a statement on the EQA material matrix and its commutability; 2) the method used to assign the target value; 3) the data set to which APS are applied; 4) the applicable analytical property being assessed (i.e. total error, bias, imprecision, uncertainty); 5) the rationale for the selection of the APS; and 6) the type of the Milan model(s) used to set the APS. The terminology is required for EQA participants and other interested parties to understand the meaning of meeting or not meeting APS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analytical performance specifications; external quality assurance; international harmonisation; proficiency testing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28593915     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  How to Really Understand and Improve the System of Internal Quality Control and External Quality Assessment in the Accreditation Process of the Medical Laboratory?

Authors:  Milan Skitek; Flávia Martinello; Aleš Jerin
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2022-04-11

2.  Day-to-day variation of the kidney proximal tubular injury markers urinary cystatin C, KIM1, and NGAL in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Inga Soveri; Johanna Helmersson-Karlqvist; Bengt Fellström; Anders Larsson
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.606

Review 3.  Analytical Sigma metrics: A review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories.

Authors:  Sten Westgard; Hassan Bayat; James O Westgard
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 4.  Contribution of Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers to Clinical Research on Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Michele Provenzano; Salvatore Rotundo; Paolo Chiodini; Ida Gagliardi; Ashour Michael; Elvira Angotti; Silvio Borrelli; Raffaele Serra; Daniela Foti; Giovambattista De Sarro; Michele Andreucci
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Schemes and Performance Evaluation Criteria of Korean Association of External Quality Assessment (KEQAS) for Improving Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  Sollip Kim; Kyunghoon Lee; Hyung-Doo Park; Yong-Wha Lee; Sail Chun; Won-Ki Min
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Inter-laboratory comparison of semiquantitative allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E test: 7 years of experience in Korea.

Authors:  Hyeyoung Lee; Ji Hyeong Ryu; Ae-Ran Choi; Yonggoo Kim; Eun-Jee Oh
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Standardization in laboratory medicine: Two years' experience from category 1 EQA programs in Spain.

Authors:  Carmen Ricós; Carmen Perich; Beatriz Boned; Elisabet González-Lao; Jorge Diaz-Garzón; Montserrat Ventura; Sandra Bullich; Zoraida Corte; Joana Minchinela; Fernando Marques; Margarita Simón; Virtudes Alvarez; José-Vicente García-Lario; Pilar Fernández-Fernández; Pilar Fernández-Calle
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

8.  Utility of process capability indices in assessment of quality control processes at a clinical laboratory chain.

Authors:  Ping Dong; Yong-Bo Wang; De-Zhi Peng; Jia-Jia Wang; Ya-Ting Cheng; Xiao-Yan Deng; Biao Zheng; Ran Tao
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.