Literature DB >> 28593675

GENETIC VARIATION IN INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN THE RED FLOUR BEETLE TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM.

Leslie A Pray1, Charles J Goodnight1.   

Abstract

Inbreeding depression varies among species and among populations within a species. Few studies, however, have considered the extent to which inbreeding depression varies within a single population. We report on two experiments to provide evidence that inbreeding depression is genetically variable, such that within a single population some lineages suffer severe inbreeding depression, others suffer only mild inbreeding depression, and some lineages actually increase in phenotypic value at higher levels of inbreeding. We examine the effects of population structure on inbreeding depression for two traits in the first experiment (adult dry weight and female relative fitness), and for seven traits in the second experiment (female and male adult dry weight, female and male relative fitness, female and male developmental time, and egg-to-adult viability). In the first experiment, we collected data from 4 families within each of 38 lineages derived from a single ancestral stock population and maintained for four generations of full-sib mating. Both traits demonstrate significant inbreeding depression and provide evidence that even within a single lineage there is significant genetic variability in inbreeding depression. In the second experiment, we collected data from 5 replicates for each of 15 lineages derived from the same ancestral population used in the first experiment; these lineages were maintained for four generations of full-sib mating. We also collected data on outbred control beetles in each generation and incorporated these data into the analyses to account for environmental effects in an unbiased manner. All traits except female and male developmental time show significant inbreeding depression. All traits showing inbreeding depression are genetically variable in inbreeding depression, as is evident from a significant linear lineage-×-f component. For both experiments, the effect of population structure on inbreeding depression is further evident from the increasing amount of variation that can be explained by the models used to measure inbreeding depression when additional levels of population structure are included. Genetic variation in inbreeding depression has important implications for conservation biology and may be an important factor in mating-system evolution. © 1995 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conservation biology; genetic variation; inbreeding depression; population structure

Year:  1995        PMID: 28593675     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05969.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Selective recovery of founder genetic diversity in aquacultural broodstocks and captive, endangered fish populations.

Authors:  R W Doyle; R Perez-Enriquez; M Takagi; N Taniguchi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.

Authors:  M A Mallet; A K Chippindale
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Jacob A Moorad; Michael J Wade
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inbreeding depression of female fecundity by genetic factors retained in natural populations of a male-haploid social mite (Acari: Tetranychidae).

Authors:  Kotaro Mori; Yutaka Saito; Takane Sakagami; Ken Sahara
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Evidence for an epigenetic role in inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Philippine Vergeer; Niels C A M Wagemaker; N Joop Ouborg
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Tribolium beetles as a model system in evolution and ecology.

Authors:  Michael D Pointer; Matthew J G Gage; Lewis G Spurgin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Wright's shifting balance theory and the diversification of aposematic signals.

Authors:  Mathieu Chouteau; Bernard Angers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differences in Attack Avoidance and Mating Success between Strains Artificially Selected for Dispersal Distance in Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Kentarou Matsumura; Takahisa Miyatake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Can age-related changes in parental care modulate inbreeding depression? A test using the burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis.

Authors:  Matthew Schrader; Parker Hughes; Samuel Jenkins; Ian Kusher; Jonathan Lopez; Harriet Oglesby; Katie E McGhee
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.167

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.