| Literature DB >> 28592885 |
Caroline M V Finlay1, Caroline R Bradley1, S Jane Preston1,2, Jim Provan3.
Abstract
Alder buckthorn (Frangula alnus) is one of Ireland's rarest tree species, and in Northern Ireland the species is now restricted to a single population in Peatlands Park, Co. Armagh numbering ca. 140 mature trees. Genotyping of 95% of the trees at nine nuclear microsatellite loci revealed that levels of genetic diversity within this population were generally lower than those reported from larger populations in Spain. Analysis of six chloroplast microsatellite loci revealed no variation. The level of F IS was significantly higher than that in the Spanish populations, as well as in other populations across Europe, potentially indicating inbreeding. Spatial autocorrelation analysis indicated some evidence of fine-scale genetic structuring, most likely due to limited seed dispersal, but the overall level of differentiation between subpopulations was low, indicating high levels of gene flow, probably due to cross-pollination by bees. Our results are consistent with a gradual population expansion from a limited number of individuals. We suggest that more immediate conservation efforts might be best focused on ensuring suitable habitat for the continued recovery of this isolated population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28592885 PMCID: PMC5462792 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03166-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Location of the Peatlands Park population of Frangula alnus in Co. Armagh, Northern Ireland. Zoomed area shows the distribution of F. alnus in Peatlands Park, with the five fragments sampled (labeled A–E), mapped using ArcMap 10. The coloured area indicates a designated Special Area for Conservation (SAC). Land classes were taken from the CEH Land Cover Map (NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology). DB – Drumawhey Bog (extinct population referred to in text).
Figure 2Correlogram of autocorrelation coefficient (θ; y-axis) plotted against distance (x-axis). 95% confidence intervals are indicated by dashed red lines.
Diversity statistics.
| Subpopulation |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 11 | 0.305 | 0.39 | 0.226** |
| B | 6 | 0.404 | 0.422 | 0.050 NS |
| C | 21 | 0.340 | 0.331 | −0.022 NS |
| D | 91 | 0.299 | 0.423 | 0.293** |
| E | 3 | 0.222 | 0.372 | 0.625** |
| Mean | 132 | 0.314 | 0.387 | 0.234 |
| Total | 132 | 0.308 | 0.411 | 0.251** |
N – number of samples; H – observed heterozygosity; H – expected heterozygosity; F – inbreeding coefficient. Significance of F : *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; NS – Not Significant.
Results of the Bottleneck analysis.
| Locus | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B101 | A110 | B7 | A104 | B106 | B4 | A7 | A3 | B9 | |
| Empirical data | |||||||||
| Sample size (haploid genomes) | 262 | 244 | 264 | 264 | 262 | 230 | 264 | 256 | 258 |
| Heterozygosity observed ( | 0.482 | 0.713 | 0.067 | 0.269 | 0.407 | 0.348 | 0.593 | 0.244 | 0.578 |
| Number of alleles observed ( | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| IAM | |||||||||
| Average heterozygosity ( | 0.276 | 0.453 | 0.447 | 0.610 | 0.566 | 0.616 | 0.600 | 0.282 | 0.609 |
| Standard deviation (SD) | 0.188 | 0.182 | 0.180 | 0.141 | 0.157 | 0.136 | 0.145 | 0.189 | 0.150 |
| Standard deviate ([ |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Probability ( | 0.206 | 0.037 | 0.021 | 0.026 | 0.167 | 0.053 | 0.396 | 0.471 | 0.330 |
| TPM | |||||||||
| Average heterozygosity ( | 0.396 | 0.598 | 0.602 | 0.745 | 0.710 | 0.748 | 0.740 | 0.389 | 0.741 |
| Standard deviation (SD) | 0.166 | 0.115 | 0.118 | 0.070 | 0.077 | 0.065 | 0.071 | 0.161 | 0.074 |
| Standard deviate ([ |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Probability ( | 0.394 | 0.121 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.042 | 0.218 | 0.033 |
| SMM | |||||||||
| Average heterozygosity ( | 0.438 | 0.649 | 0.649 | 0.786 | 0.751 | 0.785 | 0.785 | 0.435 | 0.783 |
| Standard deviation (SD) | 0.137 | 0.089 | 0.093 | 0.047 | 0.058 | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.144 | 0.052 |
| Standard deviate ([ |
|
| − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Probability ( | 0.471 | 0.264 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.128 | 0.009 |
Values in bold indicate heterozygote excess. Values in italics indicate heterozygote deficiency.
Figure 3Boxplots showing values of (a) H , and (b) F in the Peatlands Park population analyzed in the present study and three Spanish populations analyzed in Riguiero et al. (2009).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA).
| Source of variation | d.f | Variance components | % variation | Fixation index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Between subpopulations | 4 | 0.05651 | 3.22 |
|
| Within subpopulations | 259 | 1.70113 | 96.78 |
Significance of Φ : **P < 0.01.