Literature DB >> 28592621

Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Global Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Daniel A Goldstein1,2, Qiushi Chen3, Turgay Ayer3, Kelvin K W Chan4,5, Kiran Virik6, Ariel Hammerman7, Baruch Brenner8,9, Christopher R Flowers2, Peter S Hall10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the U.S., the addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been demonstrated to provide 0.10 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $571,000/QALY. Due to variability in pricing, value for money may be different in other countries. Our objective was to establish the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in mCRC in the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and Israel.
METHODS: We performed the analysis using a previously established Markov model for mCRC. Input data for efficacy, adverse events, and quality of life were considered to be generalizable and therefore identical for all countries. We used country-specific prices for medications, administration, and other health service costs. All costs were converted from local currency to U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in March 2016. We conducted one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) to assess the model robustness across parameter uncertainties.
RESULTS: Base case results demonstrated that the highest ICER was in the U.S. ($571,000/QALY) and the lowest was in Australia ($277,000/QALY). In Canada, the U.K., and Israel, ICERs ranged between $351,000 and $358,000 per QALY. PSA demonstrated 0% likelihood of bevacizumab being cost-effective in any country at a willingness to pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY.
CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to first-line chemotherapy for mCRC consistently fails to be cost-effective in all five countries. There are large differences in cost-effectiveness between countries. This study provides a framework for analyzing the value of a cancer drug from the perspectives of multiple international payers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab varies significantly between multiple countries. By conventional thresholds, bevacizumab is not cost-effective in metastatic colon cancer in the U.S., the U.K., Australia, Canada, and Israel. © AlphaMed Press 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Colorectal cancer; Cost; Cost‐effectiveness; Economics; Value

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28592621      PMCID: PMC5469597          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  14 in total

1.  Cancer drugs in 16 European countries, Australia, and New Zealand: a cross-country price comparison study.

Authors:  Sabine Vogler; Agnes Vitry; Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  A standardised, generic, validated approach to stratify the magnitude of clinical benefit that can be anticipated from anti-cancer therapies: the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS).

Authors:  N I Cherny; R Sullivan; U Dafni; J M Kerst; A Sobrero; C Zielinski; E G E de Vries; M J Piccart
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Joshua T Cohen; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Daniel A Goldstein; Qiushi Chen; Turgay Ayer; David H Howard; Joseph Lipscomb; Bassel F El-Rayes; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Economic studies in colorectal cancer: challenges in measuring and comparing costs.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Laurel Borowski; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Adjusting for Drug Wastage in Economic Evaluations of New Therapies for Hematologic Malignancies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Karen Lien; Matthew C Cheung; Kelvin K W Chan
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study.

Authors:  Leonard B Saltz; Stephen Clarke; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Werner Scheithauer; Arie Figer; Ralph Wong; Sheryl Koski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Tsai-Shen Yang; Fernando Rivera; Felix Couture; Florin Sirzén; Jim Cassidy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the TREE Study.

Authors:  Howard S Hochster; Lowell L Hart; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Barrett H Childs; John D Hainsworth; Allen L Cohn; Lucas Wong; Louis Fehrenbacher; Yousif Abubakr; M Wasif Saif; Lee Schwartzberg; Eric Hedrick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Country-Level Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds: Initial Estimates and the Need for Further Research.

Authors:  Beth Woods; Paul Revill; Mark Sculpher; Karl Claxton
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.725

View more
  7 in total

1.  How should clinicians interpret conflicting cost-effectiveness analyses for the treatment of lymphoma across nations and payer models?

Authors:  R Andrew Harkins; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2020-11-04

2.  Economic Evaluation of Monoclonal Antibodies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stavroula Koilakou; Panagiotis Petrou
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  A Systematic Review on Economic Evaluation Studies of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions in the Middle East and North Africa.

Authors:  Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi; Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi; Montarat Thavorncharoensap; Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Simulating Progression-Free and Overall Survival for First-Line Doublet Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Based on Real-World Registry Data.

Authors:  Peter Gibbs; Maarten IJzerman; Koen Degeling; Hui-Li Wong; Hendrik Koffijberg; Azim Jalali; Jeremy Shapiro; Suzanne Kosmider; Rachel Wong; Belinda Lee; Matthew Burge; Jeanne Tie; Desmond Yip; Louise Nott; Adnan Khattak; Stephanie Lim; Susan Caird
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Medication overuse in oncology: current trends and future implications for patients and society.

Authors:  Stephen M Schleicher; Peter B Bach; Konstantina Matsoukas; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Current Issues in Genomics and Therapeutics.

Authors:  Ichiro Abe; Alfred King-Yin Lam
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fourth- or Further-Line Ripretinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

Authors:  Weiting Liao; Huiqiong Xu; David Hutton; Qiuji Wu; Kexun Zhou; Hui Luo; Wanting Lei; Mingyang Feng; Yang Yang; Feng Wen; Qiu Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.