| Literature DB >> 28592316 |
Yadav Prasad Joshi1, Eun-Hye Kim1, Hae-Kwan Cheong2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and leptospirosis are seasonal rodent-borne infections in the Republic of Korea (Korea). The occurrences of HFRS and leptospirosis are influenced by climatic variability. However, few studies have examined the effects of local climatic variables on the development of these infections. The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of climatic factors on the occurrence of HFRS and leptospirosis in Korea.Entities:
Keywords: Climatic factors; Generalized linear poisson model; HFRS; Leptospirosis; Rodent; Seasonality; Vector-borne disease; Zoonosis
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28592316 PMCID: PMC5463320 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2506-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Map of geographical areas of Korea showing the eight and five provinces selected for HFRS and leptospirosis, respectively
General description of HFRS and leptospirosis cases in Korea between 2001 and 2009
| HFRS | Leptospirosis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Incidencea/(%) |
| Number | Incidencea/(%) |
| ||
| Total | 2912 | 0.67 | 889 | 0.21 | |||
| Year | 2001 | 293 | 0.62 | 119 | 0.25 | ||
| 2002 | 301 | 0.63 | 108 | 0.23 | |||
| 2003 | 362 | 0.76 | 107 | 0.22 | |||
| 2004 | 336 | 0.70 | 121 | 0.25 | |||
| 2005 | 328 | 0.68 | 61 | 0.13 | |||
| 2006 | 355 | 0.73 | 93 | 0.19 | |||
| 2007 | 362 | 0.75 | 155 | 0.32 | |||
| 2008 | 311 | 0.64 | 83 | 0.17 | |||
| 2009 | 264 | 0.54 | 42 | 0.09 | |||
| Gender | Male | 1687 | 0.77 | 0.096 | 539 | 0.16 | 0.096 |
| Female | 1225 | 0.57 | 350 | 0.25 | |||
| Age (years) | 0–9 | 10 | 0.02 | 0.230 | 1 | 0.00 | 0.230 |
| 10–19 | 45 | 0.08 | 5 | 0.01 | |||
| 20–29 | 173 | 0.25 | 29 | 0.04 | |||
| 30–39 | 305 | 0.40 | 53 | 0.07 | |||
| 40–49 | 475 | 0.65 | 92 | 0.13 | |||
| 50–59 | 568 | 1.20 | 160 | 0.34 | |||
| 60–69 | 733 | 2.24 | 300 | 0.92 | |||
| 70–79 | 495 | 2.71 | 212 | 1.16 | |||
| 80 & over | 108 | 1.75 | 37 | 0.60 | |||
| Provinces | Seoul | 199 | 0.22 | 0.242 | 43 | 0.05 | 0.2657 |
| Incheon | 120 | 0.51 | 12 | 0.05 | |||
| Daejeon | 38 | 0.29 | 5 | 0.04 | |||
| Daegu | 26 | 0.12 | 9 | 0.04 | |||
| Gwangju | 113 | 0.87 | 44 | 0.34 | |||
| Ulsan | 29 | 0.30 | 9 | 0.09 | |||
| Busan | 54 | 0.17 | 20 | 0.06 | |||
| Kangwon | 143 | 1.07b | 27 | 0.20 | |||
| Gyeonggi | 483 | 0.51b | 85 | 0.09 | |||
| Chungbuk | 171 | 1.27b | 36 | 0.27b | |||
| Chungnam | 455 | 2.61b | 100 | 0.58b | |||
| Gyeongbuk | 269 | 1.12b | 83 | 0.35b | |||
| Gyeongnam | 152 | 0.54b | 43 | 0.15 | |||
| Jeonbuk | 392 | 2.37b | 150 | 0.91b | |||
| Jeonnam | 263 | 1.56b | 221 | 1.31b | |||
| Jeju | 5 | 0.10 | 2 | 0.04 | |||
| Occupationc | Agricultural and fishery workers | 1118 | 38.39% | 0.229 | 517 | 58.16% | 0.243 |
| No information | 628 | 21.57% | 128 | 14.40% | |||
| Unemployed | 373 | 12.81% | 114 | 12.82% | |||
| Housewives | 255 | 8.76% | 51 | 5.74% | |||
| Clerks | 124 | 4.26% | 23 | 2.59% | |||
| Service workers | 78 | 2.68% | 14 | 1.57% | |||
| Simple labor workers | 76 | 2.61% | 14 | 1.57% | |||
| Student | 73 | 2.51% | 10 | 1.12% | |||
a:/100,000/year, bprovinces selected for analysis, coccupations selected for the calculation of percentage, §Chi-square test
Fig. 2Monthly and yearly distribution of HFRS (upper figure) and leptospirosis (lower figure) cases with climatic factors in selected Korean provinces
Fig. 3Weekly HFRS (upper figure) and leptospirosis (lower figure) cases with climatic factors from 2001 to 2009 in selected Korean provinces
Fig. 4Poisson regression model of weather variables and weekly number of HFRS (left) and leptospirosis (right) cases from 2001 to 2009 in selected Korean provinces. The figure indicates the lag in weeks between HFRS and leptospirosis cases with climatic factors. The Poisson regression model shows the relation of climatic factors in 12 weekly lag durations in the development of HFRS and leptospirosis starting from week 27 to the last week of the year (53).†weekly average daily minimum temperature (°C), #weekly average daily minimum humidity (%), ‡weekly average daily rainfall (mm), §weekly average daily sunshine (hours), *weekly average solar radiation (mJ/m2). Percent change of risk and 95% CI were estimated using a regression coefficient (β) and the following equation: percent change of risk = (exp[β] - 1) × 100 and 95% CI = (exp[β] - 1 ± 1.96 × standard error)