Literature DB >> 28591073

Predictors of Persistent Axial Neck Pain After Cervical Laminoplasty.

Atsushi Kimura1, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Hirokazu Inoue, Teruaki Endo, Katsushi Takeshita.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospective data.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to reveal baseline predictors of persistent postlaminoplasty neck pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Axial neck pain is one of the most common complications after cervical laminoplasty; however, baseline predictors of persistent postlaminoplasty neck pain are unclear.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 156 patients who completed a 2-year follow-up after double-door laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients rated the average intensity of axial neck pain in the last month using an 11-point numerical rating scale preoperatively and at the 2-year follow-up. The dependent variable was the presence of moderate-to-severe neck pain (numerical rating scale ≥4) at the 2-year follow-up. The independent variables included patient characteristics, baseline radiological parameters, surgical variables, baseline axial neck pain intensity, and baseline functions, which were measured by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score and the Short Form-36 survey (SF-36). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of moderate-to-severe neck pain after laminoplasty.
RESULTS: At the 2-year follow-up, 51 patients (32%) had moderate-to-severe neck pain, and 106 patients (68%) had no or mild pain. Univariate analysis revealed that the ratio of cervical anterolisthesis, ratio of current smoking, baseline neck pain intensity, and baseline SF-36 Mental Component Summary differed significantly between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent predictors of moderate-to-severe neck pain at the 2-year follow-up include the presence of anterolisthesis, current smoking, moderate-to-severe baseline neck pain, and lower SF-36 Mental Component Summary. The presence of anterolisthesis and moderate-to-severe baseline neck pain were also associated with significantly poorer physical function after surgery.
CONCLUSION: The presence of anterolisthesis was associated not only with the highest odds ratio of persistent neck pain but also with significantly poorer functional outcomes. Indications for cervical laminoplasty should be carefully determined in patients with cervical anterolisthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28591073     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Posterior endoscopic cervical foramiotomy and discectomy: clinical and radiological computer tomography evaluation on the bony effect of decompression with 2 years follow-up.

Authors:  Hyeun Sung Kim; Pang Hung Wu; Yeon Jin Lee; Dae Hwan Kim; Jun Hyung Lee; Kyung-Hoon Yang; Harshavardhan Dilip Raorane; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical indicators of surgical outcomes after cervical single open-door laminoplasty assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Narihito Nagoshi; Osahiko Tsuji; Eijiro Okada; Nobuyuki Fujita; Mitsuru Yagi; Takashi Tsuji; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  A practical guide for perioperative smoking cessation.

Authors:  Hiroki Iida; Tetsuya Kai; Michioki Kuri; Kumiko Tanabe; Masashi Nakagawa; Chizuru Yamashita; Hiroshi Yonekura; Mami Iida; Ikuo Fukuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Relationship between smoking and postoperative complications of cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Ming Zheng; Zhi-Wen Zhang; Wei Wang; Yang Li; Feng Wen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  [Effect of modified lateral mass screws implantation strategy on axial symptoms in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty].

Authors:  Hua Chen; Hao Liu; Yuxiao Deng; Quan Gong; Beiyu Wang; Chen Ding
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Laminoplasty with selective fusion at unstable segment versus laminectomy with fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Lin Du; Yanzheng Gao; Changqing Zhao; Tangjun Zhou; Haijun Tian; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Impact of different laminae open angles on axial symptoms after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Jizhou Wang; Tianwei Sun; Xiaoqi He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  Development and Achievement of Cervical Laminoplasty and Related Studies on Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Shigeru Hirabayashi; Tomoaki Kitagawa; Iwao Yamamoto; Kazuaki Yamada; Hirotaka Kawano
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-07-10

9.  Comparative Five-Year Surgical Outcomes of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Guoliang Chen; Xizhe Liu; Ensi Zhao; Ningning Chen; Fuxin Wei; Shaoyu Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  In vitro biomechanical evaluation of a monocoque plate-spacer construct for cervical open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yukoh Ohara; Takeshi Hara; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Satoshi Tani; Nozomu Inoue; Junichi Mizuno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.