PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Negative symptoms and cognitive impairments tend to co-occur in people with schizophrenia. If their association with each other is due, in part, to shared pathophysiology, then this suggests that a single drug could potentially be effective for both domains. The current study was designed to examine this hypothesis. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Fifty-eight participants with either Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entered into a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial of intranasal oxytocin and galantamine. Seventeen participants were randomized to intranasal oxytocin, 20 were randomized to galantamine, and 21 were randomized to placebo. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms total score was used to assess change in negative symptoms (the primary outcome measure for oxytocin). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score was used to assess cognition (the primary outcome measure for galantamine). FINDINGS/ RESULTS: There were no significant group differences for negative symptoms (oxytocin vs placebo: F2,47.4 = 0.19, P = 0.83; galantamine vs placebo: F2,52.5 = 0.41, P = 0.67). There were no significant group differences for cognitive impairments (galantamine vs placebo: t40 = 0.71, P = 0.48; oxytocin vs placebo: t40 = 0.50, P = 0.62). There were also no significant group differences for the functional capacity or ancillary symptom measures. IMPLICATIONS/ CONCLUSIONS: The lack of an efficacy signal for either compound precluded our ability to test whether pharmacological treatment pathways for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments overlap or are independent.
PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Negative symptoms and cognitive impairments tend to co-occur in people with schizophrenia. If their association with each other is due, in part, to shared pathophysiology, then this suggests that a single drug could potentially be effective for both domains. The current study was designed to examine this hypothesis. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Fifty-eight participants with either Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder entered into a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy, randomized clinical trial of intranasal oxytocin and galantamine. Seventeen participants were randomized to intranasal oxytocin, 20 were randomized to galantamine, and 21 were randomized to placebo. The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms total score was used to assess change in negative symptoms (the primary outcome measure for oxytocin). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery composite score was used to assess cognition (the primary outcome measure for galantamine). FINDINGS/ RESULTS: There were no significant group differences for negative symptoms (oxytocin vs placebo: F2,47.4 = 0.19, P = 0.83; galantamine vs placebo: F2,52.5 = 0.41, P = 0.67). There were no significant group differences for cognitive impairments (galantamine vs placebo: t40 = 0.71, P = 0.48; oxytocin vs placebo: t40 = 0.50, P = 0.62). There were also no significant group differences for the functional capacity or ancillary symptom measures. IMPLICATIONS/ CONCLUSIONS: The lack of an efficacy signal for either compound precluded our ability to test whether pharmacological treatment pathways for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments overlap or are independent.
Authors: Robert W Buchanan; Elaine Weiner; Deanna L Kelly; James M Gold; William R Keller; James A Waltz; Robert P McMahon; David A Gorelick Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Michael C Davis; Junghee Lee; William P Horan; Angelika D Clarke; Mark R McGee; Michael F Green; Stephen R Marder Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-05-12 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Robert S Kern; Keith H Nuechterlein; Michael F Green; Lyle E Baade; Wayne S Fenton; James M Gold; Richard S E Keefe; Raquelle Mesholam-Gately; Jim Mintz; Larry J Seidman; Ellen Stover; Stephen R Marder Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Ligia R Horta de Macedo; Antonio Waldo Zuardi; João Paulo Machado-de-Sousa; Marcos Hortes N Chagas; Jaime E C Hallak Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-08-09 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Deanna L. Kelly; Haley K. Demyanovich; Katrina M. Rodriguez; Daniela Ciháková; Monica V. Talor; Robert P. McMahon; Charles M. Richardson; Gopal Vyas; Heather A. Adams; Sharon M. August; Alessio Fasano; Nicola G. Cascella; Stephanie M. Feldman; Fang Liu; MacKenzie A. Sayer; Megan M. Powell; Heidi J. Wehring; Robert W. Buchanan; James M. Gold; William T. Carpenter; William W. Eaton Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Alex S Cohen; Kyle R Mitchell; Gregory P Strauss; Jack J Blanchard; Robert W Buchanan; Deanna L Kelly; James Gold; Robert P McMahon; Heather A Adams; William T Carpenter Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Katie Daughters; D Aled Rees; Laura Hunnikin; Amy Wells; Jeremy Hall; Stephanie van Goozen Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 6.671
Authors: Igne Sinkeviciute; Marieke Begemann; Merel Prikken; Bob Oranje; Erik Johnsen; Wan U Lei; Kenneth Hugdahl; Rune A Kroken; Carina Rau; Jolien D Jacobs; Silvia Mattaroccia; Iris E Sommer Journal: NPJ Schizophr Date: 2018-10-25