Literature DB >> 28589448

[Laser in situ keratomileusis with microkeratome or femtosecond laser].

T Kohnen1, G Steinwender2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND PRINCIPLES: In LASIK, after cutting a lamellating stromal corneal incision (flap) with a microkeratome or a femtosecond laser, the underlying tissue is treated with an excimer laser for refractive correction. The objective is to achieve independency from spectacles and contact lenses due to correction of ametropia. INDICATIONS: Surgery is indicated when the patient wishes to achieve independency from spectacles and contact lenses. For LASIK, the German Commission for Refractive Surgery defined a range of applicability for myopic correction up to -8 diopters (D), astigmatic correction up to 5 D and hyperopic correction up to +3 D. Borderline applicability is defined as myopic correction up to -10 D, astigmatic correction up to 6 D and hyperopic correction up to +4 D. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: The surgical technique is demonstrated in detail with the help of a video of the operation, which is available online. The flap incision is created with a microkeratome or a femtosecond laser. After lifting and folding the flap, excimer ablation is performed. An eye tracking system ensures correct location of ablation by compensating for intraoperative eye movements. After repositioning the flap, the interface is irrigated and the edge of the flap is adapted with a sponge.
RESULTS: The LASIK procedure is safe, predictable and efficient with a high rate of patient satisfaction. The complication rate can be minimized by using a careful and standardized surgical approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hyperopia; LASIK; Myopia; Refractive surgery; Video

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28589448     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0517-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  10 in total

1.  Laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  I G Pallikaris; M E Papatzanaki; E Z Stathi; O Frenschock; A Georgiadis
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Hua Zhang; Hui-Yi Jin; Yan Suo; Sanjay V Patel; Robert Montés-Micó; Edward E Manche; Xun Xu
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  [Complications of corneal lamellar refractive surgery].

Authors:  T Kohnen; M Remy
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Short-term complications of femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis cuts: Review of 1210 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Luisa Schwarz; Matthias Remy; Mehdi Shajari
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 5.  Modern laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes.

Authors:  Helga P Sandoval; Eric D Donnenfeld; Thomas Kohnen; Richard L Lindstrom; Richard Potvin; David M Tremblay; Kerry D Solomon
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 6.  IntraLase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shihao Chen; Yifan Feng; Aleksandar Stojanovic; Mirko R Jankov; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Kerry D Solomon; Luis E Fernández de Castro; Helga P Sandoval; Joseph M Biber; Brian Groat; Kristiana D Neff; Michelle S Ying; John W French; Eric D Donnenfeld; Richard L Lindstrom
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Jeffrey P Gardiner; Joshua A Schliesser; Ladan Espandar; Vahid Feiz; Mark D Mifflin; Joann C Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Outcomes of LASIK for myopia with FDA-approved lasers.

Authors:  Melissa D Bailey; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 10.  Microkeratome versus femtosecond flaps: accuracy and complications.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Newton Kara-Junior; George O Waring
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.761

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of changes in corneal volume and corneal thickness after myopia correction between LASIK and SMILE.

Authors:  Anna Schuh; Carolin M Kolb; Wolfgang J Mayer; Efstathios Vounotrypidis; Thomas Kreutzer; Thomas Kohnen; Siegfried Priglinger; Mehdi Shajari; Daniel Kook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.