Literature DB >> 28589062

Impact of Caregiving on Various Aspects of the Lives of Caregivers.

Babar Irfan1, Omar Irfan2, Ahmed Ansari3, Waris Qidwai4, Kashmira Nanji4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the impact of caregiving on the lives of the caregivers.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between July and September 2015 at a teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Participants who were more than 18 years old and were involved in caregiving (former or current) of a family member were invited to participate in the study. The participants were recruited through consecutive sampling technique. A total of 400 caregivers were interviewed. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. A pretest structured questionnaire was used for data collection and included sections on demographic details and impact of caregiving on various aspects of the lives of caregivers. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 19 (IBM, NY, USA).
RESULTS: Information about a total of 400 caregivers (215 men and 185 women) was included in the final analysis. The majority (57.0%) of the participants were aged between 18 and 30 years. About three-fifths (60%) of the participants were single and the majority of the participants were students. Approximately 64% of the participants were currently involved in caregiving and about 48% of the participants responded that caregiving has an overall negative impact on various aspects, such as physical (40.8%), psychological (47.8%), and professional aspects (51.8%) of their lives.
CONCLUSION: Negative impact of caregiving was observed among caregivers due to extensive demands of caregiving and limited resources. Therefore, it is imperative for health care providers to explore, identify and support caregivers to cope in a better way to the challenging task of caregiving.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregiver; caregiving; health; impact; pakistan

Year:  2017        PMID: 28589062      PMCID: PMC5453737          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

A caregiver is someone who provides care to a person who is incapacitated or handicapped [1]. In general, care can be given to anyone; it can be a spouse who has suffered from a myocardial infarction; a parent with Alzheimer's disease; a mother-in-law with a malignancy, or a child with traumatic injury caused during sports. Informal caregivers include family members and friends who provide care to their dear ones without any financial benefits; whereas, formal caregivers are volunteers or paid care providers associated with a service system [1]. Women constitute more than half (59% to 75% )of the caregiver population [2]. Evidence from studies suggests that women caregivers are usually involved in physically demanding tasks (i.e. bathing, toileting, and dressing) as compared to their male counterparts, who are more likely to provide financial support [3]. During the period of caregiving, the caregivers experience stress and burden resulting from the rigorous activity of caregiving, which can have a negative impact on their physical, psychological, and social lives, thereby decreasing their quality of life (QOL) [4]. Thus, caregivers are at risk of developing psychiatric disorders [5]. Caregiver burden has been proven to account for poor physical and emotional health [5]. Studies on caregivers suggest that caregiving is associated with psychological complaints such as depression and poor physical and psychological QOL [6-8]. A recent study concluded that caregiving was associated with distress, anxiety, stress, and depression [9]. Caregiving also has positive outcomes such as appreciation from patients, improved family cohesion, developing resilience, and gaining a sense of self-worth and accomplishment [10]. These positive aspects of caregiving have been found to be associated with lower levels of caregiver burden for life [11]. There is limited data regarding impact of caregiving on the lives of the caregivers in Pakistan. Therefore, this study was designed to identify the impact of caregiving on various aspects of the lives of the caregivers.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted between July and September 2015 at a teaching hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 400 participants who were 18 years or older and were currently or formerly involved in caregiving to a family member were recruited through consecutive sampling technique. Written informed consent was obtained from the study participants after explaining the study protocol to them. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Departmental Research Committee of the Aga Khan University. A pretested structured questionnaire was used as the data collection tool. The questionnaire was formed after thorough literature search and was reviewed by the authors. It was administered in both English and Urdu languages. The questionnaire was composed of two sections. The first section included demographic details of the participants such as age, gender, educational status, occupation, current caregiver, time since caregiving, and relation with the care recipient. Section 2 of the questionnaire included impact of caregiving on different aspects (physical, psychological, family, professional, and social) of the lives of the caregivers. The data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 19.0 (IBM, NY, USA). Frequencies were obtained for all variables of interest. The results were presented in the form of frequencies and percentages.

Results

Information from a total of 400 participants was included in the final analysis. Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants. About 54% of the participants were male and 46% were female. Amongst the participants, the majority (57%) were between 18 and 30 years of age. Slightly under 59% of the participants were single. Sixty-four percent of the participants responded that they were currently involved in caregiving while 36% of the participants responded that they were involved in caregiving in the past five years. Most of the caregivers informed that they were giving care to their parents or grandparents; 39% were giving care to their mother and 26% were giving care to their father.
Table 1

Sociodemographic Characteristics of Study Participants (n=400)

Variables Frequency Percentage
Age
18-30 228 57.0
31-40 44 11.0
41-50 69 17.0
51-60 47 12.0
61-70 12 3.0
Gender
Male 215 53.8
Female 185 46.2
Marital status
Single 236 59.0
Married 164 41.0
Care status
Current 256 64.0
In the past five years 144 36.0
Duration of Care
Less than six months 122 30.5
Six months to three years 69 17.3
More than three years 209 52.2
Occupational Status
Employed 183 45.7
Unemployed 9 2.3
housewife/student 208 52.0
Educational Status
Up to primary 19 4.8
Matric & intermediate 180 45.0
Graduate 116 29.0
Post Graduate 85 21.2
Table 2 depicts the impact of caregiving on the life of caregivers. About 46% of the participants responded that caregiving had adversely impacted their life. The daily routine, such as sleep, eating, exercise, of the majority of the participants (65%) were affected by caregiving. In addition, caregiving had an adverse impact on the physical (40.8%), psychological (47.8%), family (48.5%), work (51.3%) and social (53%) life of the participants.
Table 2

Responses of the Participants on the Impact of Caregiving on the Life of Caregivers (N=400)

Questions/Response n %
Caregiving adversely impact life of caregiver?
Yes 184 46.0
No 166 41.5
Not sure 50 12.5
Caregiving adversely impact physical life of caregiver?
Yes 163 40.8
No 191 47.8
Not sure 46 11.4
Caregiving adversely impact psychological life of caregiver?
Yes 191 47.8
No 154 38.5
Not sure 55 13.7
Caregiving adversely impact family life of caregiver?
Yes 194 48.5
No 152 38.0
Not sure 54 13.5
Caregiving impacts professional/work life of caregiver?
Yes 205 51.2
No 143 35.8
Not sure 52 13.0
Caregiving adversely impact social life of caregiver?
Yes 212 53.0
No 144 36.0
Not sure 44 11.0
Caregiving adversely impact financial status of caregiver?
Yes 194 48.5
No 149 37.3
Not sure 57 14.2
Caregiving adversely impact daily routine of caregiver such as sleep, eating, exercise?
Yes 262 65.5
No 98 24.5
Not sure 40 10.0
Caregiving adversely impact recreational life of caregiver? 
Yes 206 51.5
No 137 34.3
Not sure 57 14.2
Caregiver often neglects his/her own health during caregiving?
Yes 245 61.3
No 102 25.5
Not sure 53 13.2

Discussion

Caregiving includes assistance with activities of daily living, helping in medical care (e.g. medication management and accompanying patients to the hospital), and providing emotional and financial support [12]. In our study, the majority of the caregivers were males, that is, they were mainly providing the financial support. This is consistent with our tradition and culture where males provide financial support to the family as mostly they are the sole bread earners. Moreover, the majority of the caregivers were students enrolled in universities for graduation or post-graduation degrees. The potential negative effects on caregivers can extend well beyond mental and physical health. A study demonstrated that caregivers, particularly younger caregivers, often neglect their education, putting education on hold or dropping out entirely, which can impact their future career [13]. Almost half of the participants in the study responded that they suffered from financial difficulties while providing care; similar responses were recorded from a survey which concluded that caregiving results in considerable financial strain, and can cause difficulties in fulfilling other responsibilities such as marriage and employment [14]. In the current study, about 51.3% individuals reported that their professional work life has been negatively affected due to caregiving. It is believed that a good income and a high socioeconomic status can have a decreased impact on the caregivers' financial constraints. Studies have shown that illness of a close relative causes distress and compromises the caregiver’s health to a greater extent [15]. We report that 61.3% individuals in the study neglected their health during caregiving. This is consistent with the results of previous studies which had concluded that caregivers may be particularly vulnerable because of caregiving demands that can lead to compromising their physical health and can exacerbate existing chronic health conditions [16]. Dementia caregivers report more depression than any other caregivers [17]. Due to lack of time, the caregivers are less likely to care for themselves and may be prone to certain medical conditions [18]. Our study results show that caregiving has an overall impact on daily life as 65% of the participants reported to have altered sleeping and eating habits. A meta-analysis of the physical and mental health effects of caregiving have concluded that higher levels of depression and physical health problems were observed among caregivers as compared with non-caregivers [19]. Some studies have shown contrasting results emphasizng the positive effects of caregiving. These studies report that caregivers may even experience improved health status because of their caregiving experience. However, there are clearly subgroups of caregivers who report high levels of stress and experience depression from caregiving. Caregiving can be a very challenging task where caregivers do not have enough resources such as knowledge, skills, social support and face a lack of respite and community services. The study had several potential limitations. Since this was a cross-sectional study, causality was difficult to establish. Moreover, in this study we did not focus on a specific disease or ailment, as the caregiver burden and impact might get changed due to different diseases. The data was collected from an urban city of Pakistan; therefore, the results may vary when compared to the data from people living in rural areas.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study shows the negative impact of caregiving on various aspects of the lives of the caregiver. This could provide an evidence basis for the development of support programs designed for caregivers. Health care professionals should be prepared to address the caregivers' psychological, social, and health needs. They should also highlight the positive aspects of caregiving such as a feeling of pride, a sense of purpose, and satisfaction received from giving care to dear ones.
  17 in total

1.  Predictors of emotional distress, general health, and caregiving outcomes in family caregivers of stroke survivors.

Authors:  Tamilyn Bakas; Sandy C Burgener
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 2.  Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Silvia Sörensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-06

3.  Formal and informal care for disabled elderly living in the community: an appraisal of French care composition and costs.

Authors:  Alain Paraponaris; Bérengère Davin; Pierre Verger
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-03-13

Review 4.  Caregiver burden: a clinical review.

Authors:  Ronald D Adelman; Lyubov L Tmanova; Diana Delgado; Sarah Dion; Mark S Lachs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Psychosocial aspects of caregiving: perceptions of cancer patients and family caregivers.

Authors:  Teresa L Deshields; Anne Rihanek; Patricia Potter; Qin Zhang; Marilee Kuhrik; Nancy Kuhrik; Joann O'Neill
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Associations of stressors and uplifts of caregiving with caregiver burden and depressive mood: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Silvia Sörensen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Rewards of caregiving and coping strategies of caregivers of patients with mental illness.

Authors:  Rita Bauer; Linda Sterzinger; Franziska Koepke; Hermann Spiessl
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Does caregiving cause psychological distress? The case for familial and genetic vulnerabilities in female twins.

Authors:  Peter P Vitaliano; Eric Strachan; Elizabeth Dansie; Jack Goldberg; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2014-04

9.  Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression among family caregivers of cancer patients: a nationwide survey of patient-family caregiver dyads in Korea.

Authors:  Boyoung Park; So Young Kim; Ji-Yeon Shin; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Dong Wook Shin; Juhee Cho; Jong-Hyock Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Strain and its correlates among carers of people with dementia in low-income and middle-income countries. A 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based survey.

Authors:  Martin Prince; Henry Brodaty; Richard Uwakwe; Daisy Acosta; Cleusa P Ferri; Mariella Guerra; Yueqin Huang; K S Jacob; Juan J Llibre Rodriguez; Aquiles Salas; Ana Luisa Sosa; Joseph D Williams; A T Jotheeswaran; Zhaorui Liu
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.485

View more
  6 in total

1.  Socio-economic determinants and environmental hygiene factors of female caregiver burden in two selected low-income communities in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Yakubu Almu-Min Yakubu; De Wet Schutte
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2019-10-11

2.  Understanding Current Needs and Future Expectations of Informal Caregivers for Technology to Support Health and Well-being: National Survey Study.

Authors:  Kieren J Egan; Patricia Clark; Zahid Deen; Carmen Paputa Dutu; Graham Wilson; Lisa McCann; Marilyn Lennon; Roma Maguire
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-01-27

3.  Development of Guidelines for Spouses Engaged in Home-Based Care of Persons With Motor Neuron Disease From Indian Context.

Authors:  Manjusha G Warrier; Priya Treesa Thomas; Arun Sadasivan; Saraswati Nashi; Seena Vengalil; A Nalini
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  Exploring challenges among Iranian family caregivers of seniors with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative research study.

Authors:  Sahar Malmir; Hassan Navipour; Reza Negarandeh
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Factors associated with informal caregiving and its effects on health, work, and social activities of adult informal caregivers in Malaysia: findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2019.

Authors:  Yuke-Lin Kong; Jailani Anis-Syakira; Suhana Jawahir; Yeung R'ong Tan; Noor Hasidah Ab Rahman; Ee Hong Tan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Informal Caregiving, Chronic Physical Conditions, and Physical Multimorbidity in 48 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Louis Jacob; Hans Oh; Jae Il Shin; Josep Maria Haro; Davy Vancampfort; Brendon Stubbs; Sarah E Jackson; Lee Smith; Ai Koyanagi
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.053

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.