| Literature DB >> 28589001 |
David Berle1,2, Zachary Steel2,3, Beverley M Essue4, Lisa Keay4, Stephen Jan4, Huynh Tan Phuc5, Maree L Hackett4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is a low-cost and effective intervention. There is increasing evidence to suggest that cataract surgery is associated with improvements in mobility, overall functioning and reductions in psychological distress. Within low-income and middle-income countries, cataract surgery has also been documented to lead to reductions in psychological distress; however, differences in economic activity and engagement in paid and domestic work in these countries may moderate such reductions. We aimed to examine the psychological outcomes following cataract surgery among a diverse Vietnamese sample.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28589001 PMCID: PMC5321390 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Glob Health ISSN: 2059-7908
Figure 1Flow of participants through the study. Reprinted from Ophthalmology, 121, Essue et al, A multicentre prospective cohort study of quality of life and economic outcomes after cataract surgery in Vietnam: The VISIONARY study, 2138–2146, (2011), with permission from Elsevier. fu, follow-up.
Demographic characteristics and summary scores for key variables at baseline (each site and total sample) of VISIONARY participants for whom there were 12-month data available
| Site 1 (n=92) | Site 2 (n=97) | Site 3 (n=98) | Site 4 (n=94) | Total sample (N | Between-site comparisons§ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | N (%) | ||
| Recruited through an outreach programme | 8 (8.7) | 97 (100) | 42 (42.9) | 44 (46.8) | 191 (50.1) | 1<2, 3; and 2>4, 3 |
| Female | 59 (64.1) | 67 (69.1) | 69 (72.6) | 49 (52.1) | 244 (64.0) | 2, 3>4 |
| Married* | 62 (69.7) | 77 (83.7) | 88 (94.6) | 79 (84.0) | 306 (80.3) | 1<2, 3, 4; and 2, 4<3 |
| Postschool education† | 7 (7.6) | 1 (1.1) | 1 (1.3) | 4 (4.9) | 13 (3.4) | NS |
| Age‡, mean (SD) | 73.9 (12.7) | 68.0 (11.0) | 71.7 (8.1) | 67.5 (11.3) | 70.2 (11.1) | 1>2, 4; and 3<4 |
*N=368 available data points.
†N=346 available data points.
‡N=379 available data points.
§For χ2 tests, pairwise comparisons were performed, and for age, Bonferroni post hoc tests following a significant one-way ANOVA (age×site) were conducted.
ANOVA, analysis of variance; NS, no significance.
Key VISIONARY participant characteristics by site and time point
| Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Site 4 | Total sample | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline mean (SD) | Follow-up mean (SD) | Baseline mean (SD) | Follow-up mean (SD) | Baseline mean (SD) | Follow-up mean (SD) | Baseline mean (SD) | Follow-up mean (SD) | Baseline mean (SD) | Follow-up mean (SD) | Baseline | Follow-up† | |
| Visual acuity | 1.44 (0.79) | 0.49 (0.36) | 1.45 (0.72) | 0.49 (0.28) | 1.14 (0.68) | 0.69 (0.44) | 1.19 (0.82) | 0.50 (0.40) | 1.30‡ (0.77) | 0.54 (0.38) | 1,2>3 | 1, 2<3 |
| Paid work hours per day | 1.98 (3.19) | 2.34 (3.18) | 2.39 (3.25) | 1.25 (2.42) | 2.73 (2.95) | 3.76 (2.66) | 5.34 (4.99) | 6.49 (4.28) | 3.14 (3.90) | 3.44 (3.74) | 1, 2, 3<4 | 1, 2<3<4 |
| Unpaid work hours per day | 2.37 (2.21) | 3.21 (2.37) | 2.49 (2.15) | 1.73 (2.33) | 1.80 (1.79) | 5.04 (3.14) | 3.02 (1.70) | 8.92 (4.01) | 2.41‡ (2.00) | 4.68 (4.06) | 3<4 | 2<1<3<4 |
| SRQ-20 negative affect score | 2.03 (2.46) | 0.14 (0.65) | 2.52 (1.63) | 1.49 (1.33) | 3.90 (1.55) | 0.71 (1.15) | 4.17 (1.95) | 0.34 (0.86) | 3.15‡ (2.10) | 0.67 (1.13) | 1, 2<3, 4 | 1<3<2 |
| SRQ-20 somatic symptoms score | 3.27 (3.06) | 0.56 (1.32) | 3.67 (1.84) | 3.00 (1.43) | 4.03 (1.97) | 2.24 (1.58) | 7.12 (1.04) | 4.55 (2.75) | 4.53‡ (2.57) | 2.60 (2.34) | 1, 2<3, 4 | 1<3<2<4 |
| SRQ-20 hopelessness score§ | 0.04 (0.25) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.29 (0.52) | 0.23 (0.45) | 0.05 (0.22) | 0.03 (0.17) | 0.14 (0.38) | 0.00 (0.00) | 0.13‡ (0.37) | 0.06 (0.26) | 1<2 | 1, 3, 4<2 |
| SRQ-20 total score | 5.23 (5.29) | 0.70 (1.78) | 6.60 (2.87) | 4.70 (2.06) | 8.01 (3.12) | 2.97 (2.14) | 11.43 (2.73) | 4.89 (3.22) | 7.86‡ (4.29) | 3.32 (2.90) | 1<3<4 | 1<3<2 |
*Post hoc Bonferroni pairwise comparisons (p<0.05) at baseline.
†Post hoc Bonferroni pairwise comparisons (p<0.05) at follow-up.
‡Significant differences between baseline and 12-month follow-up (repeated measures t-test p<0.05).
§Owing to a significant ‘floor’ effect, in that few participants in the overall sample endorsed the hopelessness-related items, between-group analyses were not conducted for this variable.
SRQ-20, Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20.
Generalised estimating equations predicting SRQ-20 scores
| SRQ-20 negative affect score | SRQ-20 somatic symptom scores | Total SRQ-20 score | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | 95% Wald CI | β | SE | 95% Wald CI | β | SE | 95% Wald CI | |
| Lower, upper | Lower, upper | Lower, upper | |||||||
| Step 1: main variables | |||||||||
| (Intercept)† | 0.78 | 0.14 | 0.51 to 1.05* | 1.68 | 0.17 | 1.36 to 2.01* | 2.34 | 0.28 | 1.79 to 2.89* |
| Site 1, 2, 3 vs 4 (index) | 0.71 | 0.16 | 0.40 to 1.01* | 3.51 | 0.17 | 3.17 to 3.86* | 4.27 | 0.30 | 3.68 to 4.87* |
| Outreach vs hospital (index) | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.07 to 0.58* | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.49 to 1.14* | 1.22 | 0.27 | 0.68 to 1.76* |
| Change in visual acuity‡ | 0.98 | 0.11 | 0.76 to 1.20* | 0.94 | 0.11 | 0.71 to 1.16* | 2.12 | 2.10 | 1.71 to 2.53* |
| Change in paid work hours per day | −0.002 | 0.001 | −0.003 to −0.00005* | −0.004 | 0.0009 | −0.006 to −0.002* | −0.006 | 0.002 | −0.009 to −0.003* |
| Step 2: including demographics | |||||||||
| Female vs male (index) | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.10 to 0.71* | 1.14 | 0.19 | 0.78 to 1.51* | 1.64 | 0.33 | 0.10 to 2.27* |
| Postschool education vs no postschool education (index) | −0.52 | 0.25 | −1.00 to −0.03* | −0.33 | 0.37 | −1.07 to 0.40 | −0.99 | 0.56 | −2.08 to 0.11 |
| Married vs not married (index) | −0.07 | 0.19 | −0.44 to 0.31 | −0.15 | 0.23 | −0.61 to 0.31 | −0.10 | 0.39 | −0.87 to 0.67 |
| Age | −0.002 | 0.01 | −0.02 to 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.009 | 0.01 to 0.04* | 0.02 | 0.02 | −0.01 to 0.05 |
| Change in unpaid work hours per day | −0.14 | 0.03 | −0.19 to −0.09* | −0.21 | 0.04 | −0.27 to −0.14* | −0.38 | 0.05 | −0.49 to −0.28* |
| Step 3: interaction | |||||||||
| Change in visual acuity×change in paid work (interaction) | 0.01 | 0.03 | −0.05 to 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.00 to 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.05 | −0.05 to 0.15 |
*p<0.05.
†Negative coefficients indicate an increase in the respective variable alongside a decrease in the respective SRQ-20 score.
‡Lower values for visual acuity correspond to better visual acuity.
SRQ-20, Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20.