Literature DB >> 18087076

Poverty and blindness in Pakistan: results from the Pakistan national blindness and visual impairment survey.

Clare E Gilbert1, S P Shah, M Z Jadoon, R Bourne, B Dineen, M A Khan, G J Johnson, M D Khan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between blindness and deprivation in a nationally representative sample of adults in Pakistan.
DESIGN: Cross sectional population based survey.
SETTING: 221 rural and urban clusters selected randomly throughout Pakistan. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally representative sample of 16 507 adults aged 30 or above (95.3% response rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between visual impairment and poverty assessed by a cluster level deprivation index and a household level poverty indicator; prevalence and causes of blindness; measures of the rate of uptake and quality of eye care services.
RESULTS: 561 blind participants (<3/60 in the better eye) were identified during the survey. Clusters in urban Sindh province were the most affluent, whereas rural areas in Balochistan were the poorest. The prevalence of blindness in adults living in affluent clusters was 2.2%, compared with 3.7% in medium clusters and 3.9% in poor clusters (P<0.001 for affluent v poor). The highest prevalence of blindness was found in rural Balochistan (5.2%). The prevalence of total blindness (bilateral no light perception) was more than three times higher in poor clusters than in affluent clusters (0.24% v 0.07%, P<0.001). The prevalences of blindness caused by cataract, glaucoma, and corneal opacity were lower in affluent clusters and households. Reflecting access to eye care services, cataract surgical coverage was higher in affluent clusters (80.6%) than in medium (76.8%) and poor areas (75.1%). Intraocular lens implantation rates were significantly lower in participants from poorer households. 10.2% of adults living in affluent clusters presented to the examination station wearing spectacles, compared with 6.7% in medium clusters and 4.4% in poor cluster areas. Spectacle coverage in affluent areas was more than double that in poor clusters (23.5% v 11.1%, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Blindness is associated with poverty in Pakistan; lower access to eye care services was one contributory factor. To reduce blindness, strategies targeting poor people will be needed. These interventions may have an impact on deprivation in Pakistan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18087076      PMCID: PMC2174750          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39395.500046.AE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  23 in total

1.  Blindness in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh.

Authors:  L Dandona; R Dandona; M Srinivas; P Giridhar; K Vilas; M N Prasad; R K John; C A McCarty; G N Rao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The magnitude and cost of global blindness: an increasing problem that can be alleviated.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Allen Foster
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Causes of blindness and visual impairment in Pakistan. The Pakistan national blindness and visual impairment survey.

Authors:  B Dineen; R R A Bourne; Z Jadoon; S P Shah; M A Khan; A Foster; C E Gilbert; M D Khan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  A population-based eye survey of older adults in a rural district of Rajasthan: I. Central vision impairment, blindness, and cataract surgery.

Authors:  G V Murthy; S Gupta; L B Ellwein; S R Munoz; D Bachani; V K Dada
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Deprivation and late presentation of glaucoma: case-control study.

Authors:  S Fraser; C Bunce; R Wormald; E Brunner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-17

6.  Vision impairment predicts 5 year mortality.

Authors:  C A McCarty; M B Nanjan; H R Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States.

Authors:  David B Rein; Ping Zhang; Kathleen E Wirth; Paul P Lee; Thomas J Hoerger; Nancy McCall; Ronald Klein; James M Tielsch; Sandeep Vijan; Jinan Saaddine
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12

Review 8.  Corneal blindness: a global perspective.

Authors:  J P Whitcher; M Srinivasan; M P Upadhyay
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 9.408

9.  Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Bangladeshi adults: results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh.

Authors:  B P Dineen; R R A Bourne; S M Ali; D M Noorul Huq; G J Johnson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  The Sivaganga eye survey: II. Outcomes of cataract surgery.

Authors:  R D Thulasiraj; Aravind Reddy; S Selvaraj; Sergio R Munoz; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.648

View more
  30 in total

1.  Economic inequality in eye care utilization and its determinants: a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Hojjat Zeraati; Reza Majdzadeh; Mohammad Shariati; Hassan Hashemi; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-10-13

2.  Preoperative visual acuity among cataract surgery patients and countries' state of development: a global study.

Authors:  Shaheen P Shah; Clare E Gilbert; Claire E Gilbert; Hessom Razavi; Elizabeth L Turner; Robert J Lindfield
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Unmet refractive need and its determinants in Shahroud, Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Hojjat Zeraati; Reza Majdzadeh; Mohammad Shariati; Hassan Hashemi; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  The prevalence of visual impairment and blindness in underserved rural areas: a crucial issue for future.

Authors:  H Hashemi; A Yekta; E Jafarzadehpur; A Doostdar; H Ostadimoghaddam; M Khabazkhoob
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Does cataract surgery alleviate poverty? Evidence from a multi-centre intervention study conducted in Kenya, the Philippines and Bangladesh.

Authors:  Hannah Kuper; Sarah Polack; Wanjiku Mathenge; Cristina Eusebio; Zakia Wadud; Mamunur Rashid; Allen Foster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Interventions to improve access to cataract surgical services and their impact on equity in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Jacqueline Ramke; Jennifer Petkovic; Vivian Welch; Ilse Blignault; Clare Gilbert; Karl Blanchet; Robin Christensen; Anthony B Zwi; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-09

7.  Prevalence And Associated Factors Of Visual Impairment Among School-Age Children In Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yosef Antehun Merrie; Mebratu Mulusew Tegegne; Minychil Bantihun Munaw; Haile Woretaw Alemu
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2019-11-08

8.  Access to eye health services among indigenous Australians: an area level analysis.

Authors:  Margaret Kelaher; Angeline Ferdinand; Hugh Taylor
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 9.  Millennium development goals and eye health.

Authors:  Hannah B Faal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  The impact of successful cataract surgery on quality of life, household income and social status in South India.

Authors:  Robert P Finger; David G Kupitz; Eva Fenwick; Bharath Balasubramaniam; Ramanathan V Ramani; Frank G Holz; Clare E Gilbert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.