| Literature DB >> 28588848 |
Cong-Ling Dai1, Wen-Bin He1,2, Juan Du1,2, Yue-Qiu Tan1,2, Guang-Xiu Lu1,2,3, Wen Li1,2.
Abstract
We report a compound heterozygous mutation (c.135delC; c.423+2dupT) of MLC1 gene in a Chinese patient underlying infantile macrocephaly and neurological deterioration in early childhood. Brain MRI revealed diffusion abnormality in swollen white matter and a subcortical cyst. The cDNA sequencing analysis for the c.423+2dupT variant revealed skipping of exon 5.Entities:
Keywords: Compound heterozygous mutation; MLC1; exon skipping
Year: 2017 PMID: 28588848 PMCID: PMC5458048 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Case Rep ISSN: 2050-0904
Figure 1(A) Brain MRI of the proband. The image shows a subcortical cyst in the left temporal lobe (arrow) and a diffuse lesion in the white matter. (B) The patient's photographs at the age of nine. The head circumference was large. (C) Proband (left) and his healthy brother (right). The baby was about ten months old. No abnormity was found.
Primer sequences used for MLC1 amplification and sequencing
| Fragment | Oligonucleotide primers | Annealing temperature(°C) | Length(bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exon 2 | 5′‐CTCAGAGTGGCCAAAGCC‐3′ | 60 | 328 |
| 5′‐ACCAGAGGGACCAGATGC‐3′ | |||
| Exon 3 | 5′‐CAGAAGTTGAAGGGTCAGGG‐3′ | 57 | 561 |
| 5′‐GAAGTTTCACTCTCATTGCCC‐3′ | |||
| Exon 4/5 | 5′‐GCTCATGGGATTCCGGTT‐3′ | 60 | 548 |
| 5′‐ TGTGGGTGTCAGGCGTCT‐3′ | |||
| Exon 6 | 5′‐ GGTGGCGTGAGAAAGGCG‐3′ | 60 | 222 |
| 5′‐CCCACCTCGCTCACCCTG‐3′ | |||
| Exon 7 | 5′‐ AGTGCTGAGTCCCTGTGC‐3′ | 60 | 363 |
| 5′‐GCAGTAACAAACTCCCCC‐3′ | |||
| Exon 8 | 5′‐ GGTGGGTGTGTCCTATGG‐3′ | 60 | 652 |
| 5′‐ GGTGACTCTCTGTCTGAA‐3′ | |||
| Exon 9 | 5′‐ TACCCCTGCTTCCCTGCG‐3′ | 60 | 396 |
| 5′‐ ACCCCACCTTCCTCATTG‐3′ | |||
| Exon 10 | 5′‐ GAACCAGCTTGGGACTAT‐3′ | 55 | 275 |
| 5′‐ GGGGGGCTCTGAAATAAA‐3′ | |||
| Exon 11 | 5′‐ GCTCACACCTCCTTCCGC‐3′ | 60 | 278 |
| 5′‐ CCCACCCCACAGGCTTCT‐3′ | |||
| Exon 12 | 5′‐ GCAGGCGTTTCTGGGACA‐3′ | 60 | 355 |
| 5′‐ GCTCAGGGCGATTAGGGG‐3′ |
Figure 2Genetic analysis. (A) Pedigree chart. The proband was noted with compound heterozygous mutations. The father and mother both carried heterozygous mutations. The prenatally diagnosed boy was free of mutations. (B, C) Sequence of the proband's sample. A: Arrow pointing to the heterozygous mutation c.135delC; B: heterozygous mutation c.423+2dupT. (D, E) Sequences of the two mutation regions in the mother. (F, G) Sequences of the two mutation regions in the father. (H, I) gDNA sequence of amniotic fluid. H: Arrow pointing to the normal c.135C; I: arrow showing the position of normal c.423+2T. (J) Electrophoretogram of cDNA amplification. “M” is the DNA marker; “I”, “II”, “III”, “IV,” and “V” indicate the proband, the father, the mother, normal, and blank control, respectively. There were two separable bands in the samples of the proband and the father. The top band was 285 bp in size; the lower one was 183 bp. The mother's RT‐PCR product was equal to the normal control. (K, L) cDNA sequence of the proband. K: The smaller product was 183 bp, and red ovals at the bases of MLC1 mark exon 4 and exon 6. L: Product of normal length, the bases in the red ovals belong to exon 4 and exon 5 of MLC1.
Figure 3(A) Schematic representation of function patterns for the two mutations. Black arrowheads are mutation positions on MLC1 gDNA (middle). The mutation c.135delC creates an in‐frame stop codon in exon 2 and leads to a truncated protein of 56 residues (black box below). The mutation c.423+2dupT gives rise to an incomplete protein without exon 5 (black box above). Dotted boxes indicate the coding region that is not transcribed. (B) Sketch of “exon definition” with small exons and large introns. Splicing machinery (red and green) interacting with isolated exons during exon definition. Splicing factors (black) join the assembly during the exon juxtaposition following exon definition 11. (C) 2D model of the MLC1 protein 7. The gray parts show the deleted residues of exon 5.