| Literature DB >> 28587208 |
Youying Zhang1,2, Tian Meng3,4, Ling Zuo5,6, Yu Bei7,8, Qihao Zhang9, Zhijian Su10, Yadong Huang11, Jiyan Pang12, Qi Xiang13,14, Hongtu Yang15,16.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to examine the effects of xyloketal B on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying its effects in both in vivo and in vitro models. We discovered an association between xyloketal B and the sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) signaling pathway, which is related to lipid metabolism. Mice were dosed with xyloketal B (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg/d) and atorvastatin (15 mg/kg/d) via intraperitoneal injection once daily for 40 days after being fed a high fat diet plus 10% high fructose liquid (HFD+HFL) for 8 weeks. Xyloketal B significantly improved HFD+HFL-induced hepatic histological lesions and attenuated lipid and glucose accumulation in the blood as well as lipid accumulation in the liver. Xyloketal B increased the expression of CPT1A, and decreased the expression of SREBP-1c and its downstream targeting enzymes such as ACC1, ACL, and FAS. Xyloketal B also significantly reduced lipid accumulation in HepG2 cells treated with free fatty acids (FFAs). These data suggested that xyloketal B has lipid-lowering effects via the SREBP-1c pathway that regulate lipid metabolism. Thus, targeting SREBP-1c activation with xyloketal B may be a promising novel approach for NAFLD treatment.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; SREBP-1c pathway; Xyloketal B
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28587208 PMCID: PMC5484113 DOI: 10.3390/md15060163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Weight-related parameters and serum biochemical levels in mice.
| Parameter | Control | HFD+HFL | 5 mg/kg/d Xyloketal B | 10 mg/kg/d Xyloketal B | 20 mg/kg/d Xyloketal B | 15 mg/kg/d Atorvastatin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 21.84 ± 0.74 b | 31.92 ± 0.37 | 24.25 ± 0.65 b | 26.44 ± 0.94 b | 26.34 ± 0.44 b | 26.04 ± 0.80 b |
| Liver/body weight (%) | 4.40 ± 0.10 b | 5.38 ± 0.12 | 3.83 ± 0.23 b | 3.65 ± 0.24 b | 3.81 ± 0.09 b | 3.80 ± 0.11 b |
| Body weight/height (%) | 0.77 ± 0.02 b | 1.12 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.02 b | 0.95 ± 0.05 b | 0.94 ± 0.02 b | 0.90 ± 0.03 b |
| Visceral fat (g) | 0.49 ± 0.74 b | 1.11 ± 0.37 | 0.73 ± 0.65 b | 0.69 ± 0.94 b | 0.51 ± 0.44 b | 0.35 ± 0.80 b |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 6.87 ± 0.53 a | 11.00 ± 0.57 | 7.33 ± 0.91 a | 7.64 ± 0.41 a | 7.83 ± 0.73 a | 9.98 ± 0.64 |
| ALT (mmol/L) | 35.50 ± 2.11 a | 43.80 ± 2.40 | 29.25 ± 1.21 b | 30.88 ± 1.23 b | 32.38 ± 1.50 b | 35.29 ± 2.00 a |
| AST (mmol/L) | 118.40 ± 3.12 a | 131.70 ± 5.79 | 110.17 ± 5.84 a | 115.00 ± 6.26 | 125.40 ± 7.26 | 110.25 ± 2.87 a |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 0.96 ± 0.02 a | 1.26 ± 0.10 | 0.71 ± 0.02 b | 0.73 ± 0.07 b | 0.77 ± 0.04 b | 0.78 ± 0.01 b |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.97 ± 0.06 b | 3.95 ± 0.32 | 2.22 ± 0.34 b | 2.55 ± 0.25 b | 2.53 ± 0.14 b | 1.87 ± 0.19 b |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 0.10 ± 0.01 b | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 0.55 ± 0.07 b | 0.50 ± 0.09 b | 0.37 ± 0.04 b | 0.32 ± 0.03 b |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.20 ± 0.03 a | 1.56 ± 0.10 | 1.36 ± 0.07 a | 1.54 ± 0.07 | 1.52 ± 0.08 | 1.65 ± 0.06 |
| APOE (mmol/L) | 12.53 ± 0.55 b | 3.17 ± 0.88 | 8.53 ± 1.28 | 17.49 ± 1.05 b | 16.60 ± 1.74 b | 4.71 ± 1.13 |
Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 8), a p < 0.05, b p < 0.001 compared with mice fed the HFD+HFL.
Figure 1Xyloketal B ameliorates HFD+HFL-induced liver lipid accumulation. (A) Hepatic total cholesterol content after 40 days. (B) Hepatic triglyceride content after 40 days. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin staining after 40 days revealed fat accumulation in the liver (original magnification of 400×). (D) Intracellular lipid droplets in the hepar were stained with Oil Red O and observed at 400× magnification. C: control group; M: model group; L: 5 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; Mi: 10 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; H: 20 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; P: 15 mg/kg/d atorvastatin group. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 8). * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.01 versus the M group.
Figure 2Gene expression in liver tissue following xyloketal B treatment for 40 days. Xyloketal B down-regulated the gene expression associated with de novo lipogenesis pathways. (A) mRNA expression of SREBP-1c and its downstream-targeting genes, including (B) PEPCK; (C) CPT1A and CPT1B; and (D) UCP-2. C: control group; M: model group; L: 5 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; Mi: 10 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; H: 20 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; p: 15 mg/kg/d atorvastatin group. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 8).* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 versus the M group.
Figure 3Western blot analysis of SREBP1-C, ACC1, FAS, ACL, and CPT1-A protein levels in mice liver treated with xyloketal B for 40 days. Representative immunoblots (A) and quantification (B) of the expression of proteins related to lipid metabolism in mice liver. C: control group; M: HFD+HFL group; L: 5 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; Mi: 10 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; H: 20 mg/kg/d xyloketal B group; P: 15 mg/kg/d atorvastatin group. Data are expressed as the means ± SEM (n = 8). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 versus the M group.
Figure 4Xyloketal B-mediated effects on lipid accumulation and TG content in FFA-treated HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells were treated with FFA (0.165 mM PA and 0.33 mM OA) for 24 h and were then incubated with various concentrations of xyloketal B for 24 h. (A) Intracellular lipid droplets in HepG2 cells were stained with Oil Red O and observed at 400× magnification. (B) Lipid droplets were quantified by measuring the resultant absorbance at 540 nm. (C) Quantitative analysis of intracellular TG content in HepG2 cells. Data are presented as the means ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 versus the FFA group.
Figure 5Effects of xyloketal B on the expression of proteins related to lipid metabolism in HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells were treated with xyloketal B (12.5, 25 or 50 μM) for 24 h. Representative immunoblots (A) and quantification (B), (C) of the expression of proteins related to lipid metabolism in HepG2 cells. The results are expressed as the means ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 versus the FFA group.
Primer sequences used for real-time Q-PCR.
| Gene | Forward Primers | Reverse Primers |
|---|---|---|
| SREBP | CCCTGTGTACGGCCTTT | TTGCGATGTCTCCAGAGTG |
| ACC1 | AAGTCCTTGGTCGGGAAGTATACA | ACTCCCTCAAAGTCATCACAAACA |
| FAS | TGGTGAATTGTCTCCGAAAAGA | CACGTTCATCACGAGGTCATG |
| SCD-1 | TTCTTACACGACCACCACCA | CCGAAGAGGCAGGTGTAGAG |
| CD36 | TTGAAGGCATTCCCACGTATC | CGGACCCGTTGGCAAA |
| PEPCK | AAGCATTCAACGCCAGGTTC | GGGCGAGTCTGTCAGTTCAAT |
| CPT1A | GCACTGCAGCTCCCACATTACAA | CTCAGACAGTACCTCCTTCAGGAAA |
| CPT1B | CTCCGCCTGAGCCATGAAG | CACCAGTATGATGCCATTCT |
| UCP-2 | CCGCATTGGCCTCTACGACTC | GGAGCATGGTCGGGCACAGT |
| GAPDH | CCTTCCGTGTTCCTACCC | CCCAAGATGCCCTTCAGT |