RATIONALE: In the last five years, high-throughput metabolomics has significantly advanced scientific research and holds the potential to promote strides in the fields of clinical metabolomics and personalized medicine. While innovations in the field of flow-injection mass spectrometry and three-minute metabolomics methods now allow investigators to process hundreds to thousands of samples per day, time-sensitive clinical applications, particularly in the emergency department, are limited by a lack of rapid extraction methods. METHODS: Here we characterized the efficacy of fast liquid-liquid extractions for characterization of hydrophilic compounds through ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Internal stable-isotope-labeled standards were used to quantitatively characterize markers of energy and oxidative metabolism in human whole blood, plasma and red blood cells - three common matrices of clinical relevance. RESULTS: For all the tested matrices, vortexing time (4-60 min) did not significantly affect extraction yields for the tested hydrophilic metabolites. Coefficients of variations <<20% for all tested compounds, except for the redox-sensitive metabolite cystine (accumulating over time). Internal standards and second extractions confirmed recoveries >80% for all tested metabolites, except for basic amino acids and polyamines, which showed reproducible yields ranging from 50 to 75%. Global profiling and absolute quantitation of 24 metabolites revealed similarities between the plasma and red blood cell metabolomes. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid extraction (~4 min) of hydrophilic compounds is a viable and potentially automatable strategy to perform quantitative analysis of whole blood, plasma and red blood cells for research or clinical applications.
RATIONALE: In the last five years, high-throughput metabolomics has significantly advanced scientific research and holds the potential to promote strides in the fields of clinical metabolomics and personalized medicine. While innovations in the field of flow-injection mass spectrometry and three-minute metabolomics methods now allow investigators to process hundreds to thousands of samples per day, time-sensitive clinical applications, particularly in the emergency department, are limited by a lack of rapid extraction methods. METHODS: Here we characterized the efficacy of fast liquid-liquid extractions for characterization of hydrophilic compounds through ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Internal stable-isotope-labeled standards were used to quantitatively characterize markers of energy and oxidative metabolism in human whole blood, plasma and red blood cells - three common matrices of clinical relevance. RESULTS: For all the tested matrices, vortexing time (4-60 min) did not significantly affect extraction yields for the tested hydrophilic metabolites. Coefficients of variations <<20% for all tested compounds, except for the redox-sensitive metabolite cystine (accumulating over time). Internal standards and second extractions confirmed recoveries >80% for all tested metabolites, except for basic amino acids and polyamines, which showed reproducible yields ranging from 50 to 75%. Global profiling and absolute quantitation of 24 metabolites revealed similarities between the plasma and red blood cell metabolomes. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid extraction (~4 min) of hydrophilic compounds is a viable and potentially automatable strategy to perform quantitative analysis of whole blood, plasma and red blood cells for research or clinical applications.
Authors: Angelo D'Alessandro; Travis Nemkov; Marguerite Kelher; F Bernadette West; Rani K Schwindt; Anirban Banerjee; Ernest E Moore; Christopher C Silliman; Kirk C Hansen Journal: Transfusion Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Min Li; Suzette Riddle; Hui Zhang; Angelo D'Alessandro; Amanda Flockton; Natalie J Serkova; Kirk C Hansen; Radu Moldovan; B Alexandre McKeon; Maria Frid; Sushil Kumar; Hong Li; Hongbing Liu; Angela Caánovas; Juan F Medrano; Milton G Thomas; Dijana Iloska; Lydie Plecitá-Hlavatá; Petr Ježek; Soni Pullamsetti; Mehdi A Fini; Karim C El Kasmi; QingHong Zhang; Kurt R Stenmark Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Olaf Beckonert; Hector C Keun; Timothy M D Ebbels; Jacob Bundy; Elaine Holmes; John C Lindon; Jeremy K Nicholson Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Jessica L Saben; Shelby K Shelton; Andrew J Hopkinson; Brandon J Sonn; Eleanor B Mills; Makayla Welham; Megan Westmoreland; Richard Zane; Adit A Ginde; Kelly Bookman; Justin Oeth; Mark Chavez; Michael DeVivo; Alison Lakin; John Heldens; Laurie Blumberg Romero; Michael J Ames; Emily R Roberts; Matthew Taylor; Kristy Crooks; Stephen J Wicks; Kathleen C Barnes; Andrew A Monte Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Daniel H Craighead; Kaitlin A Freeberg; Narissa P McCarty; Matthew J Rossman; Kerrie L Moreau; Zhiying You; Michel Chonchol; Douglas R Seals Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-08-29 Impact factor: 4.755