Literature DB >> 28586255

Disparities in Assisted Reproductive Technology Utilization by Race and Ethnicity, United States, 2014: A Commentary.

Ada C Dieke1,2, Yujia Zhang2, Dmitry M Kissin2, Wanda D Barfield2, Sheree L Boulet2.   

Abstract

Disparities in infertility and access to infertility treatments, such as assisted reproductive technology (ART), by race/ethnicity, have been reported. However, identifying disparities in ART usage may have been hampered by missing race/ethnicity information in ART surveillance. We review infertility prevalence and treatment disparities, use recent data to examine ART use in the United States by race/ethnicity and residency in states with mandated insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization (IVF), and discuss approaches for reducing disparities. We used 2014 National ART Surveillance System (NASS) data to calculate rates of ART procedures per million women 15-44 years of age, a proxy measure of ART utilization, for Census-defined racial/ethnic groups in the United States; rates were further stratified by the presence of insurance mandates for IVF treatment. Missing race/ethnicity data (35.6% of cycles) were imputed. Asian/Pacific Islander (A/PI) women had the highest rates of ART utilization at 5883 ART procedures per million women 15-44 years of age in 2014, whereas American Indian/Alaska Native non-Hispanic women had the lowest rates at 807 per million, compared with other racial/ethnic groups. In each racial/ethnic category, ART utilization rates were higher for women in states with an insurance mandate for IVF treatment versus those without. In 2014, A/PI women had the highest rates of ART utilization. ART utilization for all racial/ethnic groups was higher in states with insurance mandates for IVF than those without, although disparities were still evident. Although mandates may increase access to infertility treatments, they are not sufficient to eliminate these disparities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted reproductive technology; in vitro fertilization; infertility; insurance mandate; racial/ethnic disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28586255      PMCID: PMC5548290          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  30 in total

1.  Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs.

Authors:  Loretta Gavin; Susan Moskosky; Marion Carter; Kathryn Curtis; Evelyn Glass; Emily Godfrey; Arik Marcell; Nancy Mautone-Smith; Karen Pazol; Naomi Tepper; Lauren Zapata
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2014-04-25

2.  Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Casey E Copen; Elizabeth Hervey Stephen
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2013-08-14

Review 3.  Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes.

Authors:  Molly Quinn; Victor Fujimoto
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis.

Authors:  Georgina M Chambers; Van Phuong Hoang; Elizabeth A Sullivan; Michael G Chapman; Osamu Ishihara; Fernando Zegers-Hochschild; Karl G Nygren; G David Adamson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Embryo transfer practices and perinatal outcomes by insurance mandate status.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Sara Crawford; Yujia Zhang; Saswati Sunderam; Bruce Cohen; Dana Bernson; Patricia McKane; Marie A Bailey; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982-1995.

Authors:  A Chandra; E H Stephen
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Social determinants of human reproduction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982-2010.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Casey E Copen; Elizabeth Hervey Stephen
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2014-01-22

9.  Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  Victor Y Fujimoto; Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Tarun Jain; Alicia Armstrong; David A Grainger; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Differences in ovarian function parameters between Chinese and Caucasian oocyte donors: do they offer an explanation for lower IVF pregnancy rates in Chinese women?

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Andrea Weghofer; JiangMi Li; David Barad
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  12 in total

1.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Genetic Kidney Disease: Addressing Moral Uncertainties and Access Inequity.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Kathleen M West
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Access to Fertility Care in Geographically Underserved Populations, a Second Look.

Authors:  Tia Y Brodeur; Daniel Grow; Navid Esfandiari
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in Afro-Caribbean women.

Authors:  Ashley Wiltshire; Luwam Ghidei; Lynae M Brayboy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Tubal Factor Infertility, In Vitro Fertilization, and Racial Disparities: A Retrospective Cohort in Two US Clinics.

Authors:  Gloria E Anyalechi; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Dmitry M Kissin; Catherine L Haggerty; Karen R Hammond; Edward W Hook; Kyle T Bernstein; Michael P Steinkampf; William M Geisler
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Racial and ethnic disparities among donor oocyte banks in the United States.

Authors:  Shelun Tsai; Esther H Chung; Tracy Truong; Amanda S Farrell; Jenny Wu; Onyinye Ohamadike; Jennifer L Eaton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.490

6.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2018.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Dmitry M Kissin; Yujia Zhang; Amy Jewett; Sheree L Boulet; Lee Warner; Charlan D Kroelinger; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 7.  Impact of in vitro fertilization state mandates for third party insurance coverage in the United States: a review and critical assessment.

Authors:  Benjamin J Peipert; Melissa N Montoya; Bronwyn S Bedrick; David B Seifer; Tarun Jain
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.982

8.  Psychobiological, clinical, and sociocultural factors that influence Black women seeking treatment for infertility: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Morine Cebert-Gaitors; Peggy Ann Shannon-Baker; Susan G Silva; Renee E Hart; Samad Jahandideh; Rosa Gonzalez-Guarda; Eleanor L Stevenson
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2022-02-22

9.  Influence of Women´s Residence Region on Assisted Reproduction Treatments - Experience of a Tertiary Center in Northern Portugal.

Authors:  Diana Rodrigues-Martins; Emídio Vale-Fernandes; Carla Leal; Márcia Barreiro
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-01-17

10.  Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility preferences in the United States: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Christine H Naya; Darby E Saxbe; Genevieve F Dunton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 7.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.