Literature DB >> 27054308

Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes.

Molly Quinn1, Victor Fujimoto2.   

Abstract

Infertility is a global problem affecting all ethnic, racial, and religious groups. Nevertheless, only a minority of the U.S. population has access to treatment. Additionally, for those who do engage in treatment, outcomes are disparate among various ethnic and racial groups. This article addresses racial and ethnic disparities regarding rates of fecundity and infertility, access to care, and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ART outcomes; Ethnic disparities; access to care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27054308     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

1.  Body mass index restrictions in fertility treatment: a national survey of OB/GYN subspecialists.

Authors:  Angela S Kelley; Sylvia E Badon; Michael S M Lanham; Senait Fisseha; Molly B Moravek
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Literacy assessment of preimplantation genetic patient education materials exceed national reading levels.

Authors:  Macy L Early; Priyanka Kumar; Arik V Marcell; Cathleen Lawson; Mindy Christianson; Lydia H Pecker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Disparities in Assisted Reproductive Technology Utilization by Race and Ethnicity, United States, 2014: A Commentary.

Authors:  Ada C Dieke; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Wanda D Barfield; Sheree L Boulet
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  The association between preconception body mass index and subfertility among Hispanic and non-Hispanic women: A cross-sectional study from Utah's Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey (2012-2015).

Authors:  Qingqing Hu; Jihyun Lee; Jeannette Nelson; Marci Harris; Rebekah H Ess; Charles R Rogers; Jessica Sanders; James VanDerslice; Joseph B Stanford; Karen C Schliep
Journal:  Utah Womens Health Rev       Date:  2020-07-31

5.  Self-reported barriers to accessing infertility care: patient perspectives from urban gynecology clinics.

Authors:  Iris G Insogna; Andrea Lanes; Eduardo Hariton; Tiffany Blake-Lamb; Susan Schilling; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Racial and ethnic disparities among donor oocyte banks in the United States.

Authors:  Shelun Tsai; Esther H Chung; Tracy Truong; Amanda S Farrell; Jenny Wu; Onyinye Ohamadike; Jennifer L Eaton
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.490

7.  Trends in Infertility Care Among Commercially Insured US Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Beth Zhou; Ammar Joudeh; Milli J Desai; Brian Kwan; Vinit Nalawade; Brian W Whitcomb; H Irene Su
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-10-01

8.  Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hannah M Yogasundram; Andrew J O Hui; Clifford Y S Sia; Anthea C Chui; William J Waldock; Siobhan Quenby; Elizabeth Brown; Clare Oliver-Williams
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Queering reproductive access: reproductive justice in assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Michelle W Tam
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Racial differences in anxiety, depression, and quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Snigdha Alur-Gupta; Iris Lee; Anat Chemerinski; Chang Liu; Jenna Lipson; Kelly Allison; Robert Gallop; Anuja Dokras
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.