Literature DB >> 28585181

Which way is best for stone fragments and dust extraction during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Bulent Kati1, Eyyup Sabri Pelit2, Ismail Yagmur2, Yigit Akin3, Halil Ciftci2, Ercan Yeni2.   

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a commonly used type of minimally invasive treatment in kidney stone surgeries. Surgical success is assessed according to residual stone amount after surgery. The purpose of this study is to compare the two methods' success and practicality that are applied after the fracture of the stone in the patients who applied PCNL and which enable the removal of the residual stones. Among 102 patients who underwent a single-session of PCNL at our department between June 2015 and November 2016 were evaluated. Previously identified irrigation method and our aspiration method which described used in post-operative patients divided into two groups of residual fragments was assessed by computed tomography. The results were evaluated in statistical analyses. Significant p was accepted as p < 0.05. The age and gender distribution of patients in the irrigation and aspiration groups did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). In irrigation and aspiration groups, stone size did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). The amount of residue stones and dust remaining in the irrigation group was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the aspiration group. Although many methods have been tried before, we think that the aspiration method we have described is a cheaper, more effective and feasible option.

Entities:  

Keywords:  New technique; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Stone dust; Stone fragments

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28585181     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-0987-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  11 in total

1.  Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  M S Pearle; L M Watamull; M A Mullican
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update.

Authors:  Samuel C Kim; Ramsay L Kuo; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Clearance of Stone Fragments and Stone Dust by Continuous Flow Hydrodynamics in Percutaneous Renal Surgery: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Rene Mager; Christopher Balzereit; Tanja Hüsch; Thomas Herrmann; Andre Nicklas; Udo Nagele; Axel Haferkamp; David Schilling
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Mahmoud M Osman; Yvonne Alfano; Stefan Kamp; Axel Haecker; Peter Alken; Maurice Stephan Michel; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  A technique to flush out renal stone fragments during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ali Panah; Junaid Masood; Faruquz Zaman; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Tamer El-Husseiny; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  A Novel Device to Prevent Stone Fragment Migration During Percutaneous Lithotripsy: Results from an In Vitro Kidney Model.

Authors:  Jodi A Antonelli; Heather Beardsley; Stephen Faddegon; Monica S C Morgan; Jeffrey C Gahan; Margaret S Pearle; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Novel Biocompatible Adhesive for Intrarenal Embedding and Endoscopic Removal of Small Residual Fragments after Minimally Invasive Stone Treatment in an Ex Vivo Porcine Kidney Model: Initial Evaluation of a Prototype.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Martin Schoenthaler; Konrad Wilhelm; Daniel Schlager; Karsten Thiel; Maria Brandmann; Katharina Richter; Ingo Grunwald; Ulrich Wetterauer; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Post-ESWL, clinically insignificant residual stones: reality or myth?

Authors:  Anurag Khaitan; Narmada P Gupta; Ashok K Hemal; P N Dogra; Amlesh Seth; Monish Aron
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  Fatih Altunrende; Ahmet Tefekli; Robert J Stein; Riccardo Autorino; Emrah Yuruk; Humberto Laydner; Murat Binbay; Ahmet Y Muslumanoglu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Impact of Residual Fragments following Endourological Treatments in Renal Stones.

Authors:  Cenk Acar; Cag Cal
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.