Literature DB >> 26671579

Clearance of Stone Fragments and Stone Dust by Continuous Flow Hydrodynamics in Percutaneous Renal Surgery: An In Vitro Study.

Rene Mager1, Christopher Balzereit2, Tanja Hüsch1, Thomas Herrmann3, Andre Nicklas4, Udo Nagele4, Axel Haferkamp1, David Schilling1,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the capacity of stone clearance in common percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) systems achieved solely by hydrodynamic effects in an in vitro setting.
METHODS: A watertight cylindrical cast with a caliceal void served as an in vitro model. Various instruments for percutaneous renal surgery working with both continuous flow (fCF) and open Rutner sidearm (fCO) were tested. The model was loaded with standardized artificial stone material (2 mm in diameter) to examine stone removal by the vacuum cleaner effect and with sand (0.1-0.5 mm in diameter) to measure the washout effect caused by irrigation backflow. The association between washout of gravel and irrigation pressure was analyzed using ANOVA. Regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of the instruments' hydrodynamic characteristics-effective cross section of the outflow and irrigation flow volume.
RESULTS: Provoking the vacuum cleaner effect removal of stones was only effective in fCF but not in fCO instruments. Depending on irrigation pressure, the volumetric flow rate and effective cross section of the outflow clearance of sand could be observed in various medium- and large-sized fCF and fCO instruments, whereas in small-sized systems, clearance effects were negligible. Regression analysis showed clearance of stone dust strongly associated with an instrument's volumetric flow rate.
CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro study demonstrated that the application of medium- and large-sized fCF PCNL systems removes both "insignificant" stones and dust solely by hydrodynamic effects. Further studies have to show if these effects also occur in the in vivo situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26671579     DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  2 in total

1.  Which way is best for stone fragments and dust extraction during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Bulent Kati; Eyyup Sabri Pelit; Ismail Yagmur; Yigit Akin; Halil Ciftci; Ercan Yeni
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  [Operative technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy].

Authors:  A Häcker; A Bachmann; T Herrmann; R Homberg; J Klein; H Leyh; A Miernik; C Netsch; P Olbert; J Rassweiler; M Schoenthaler; K D Sievert; J Westphal; A J Gross
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.