José R Hernández Mora1, Diego Micheletti2, Marco Bink3, Eric Van de Weg4, Celia Cantín5, Nelson Nazzicari6,7, Andrea Caprera6, Maria Teresa Dettori8, Sabrina Micali8, Elisa Banchi2, José Antonio Campoy9, Elisabeth Dirlewanger9, Patrick Lambert10, Thierry Pascal10, Michela Troggio2, Daniele Bassi11, Laura Rossini6,11, Ignazio Verde8, Bénédicte Quilot-Turion10, François Laurens12, Pere Arús1, Maria José Aranzana13. 1. IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Agrigenòmica CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB; Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Via Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all'Adige, TN, Italy. 3. Hendrix Genetics Research, Technology & Services B.V., P.O. Box 114, 5830AC, Boxmeer, The Netherlands. 4. Plant Breeding, Wageningen University and Research Droevendaalsesteeg 1, P.O. Box 386, 6700AJ, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 5. IRTA, FruitCentreParc Cientific i Tecnològic Agroalimentari de Lleida (PCiTAL), Lleida, Spain. 6. PTP Science Park, Via Einstein, 26900, Lodi, Italy. 7. Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA) Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions, Lodi, Italy. 8. Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria (CREA) - Centro di Ricerca per la Frutticoltura, 00134, Roma, Italy. 9. BFP, INRA, 33140, Villenave d'Ornon, France. 10. GAFL, INRA, 84140, Montfavet, France. 11. Università degli Studi di Milano, DiSAA, Via Celoria 2, 20133, Milan, Italy. 12. IRHS, INRA, SFR 4207 QuaSaV, 49071, Beaucouze, France. 13. IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Agrigenòmica CSIC-IRTA-UAB-UB; Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193, Barcelona, Spain. mariajose.aranzana@irta.cat.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) is a major temperate fruit crop with an intense breeding activity. Breeding is facilitated by knowledge of the inheritance of the key traits that are often of a quantitative nature. QTLs have traditionally been studied using the phenotype of a single progeny (usually a full-sib progeny) and the correlation with a set of markers covering its genome. This approach has allowed the identification of various genes and QTLs but is limited by the small numbers of individuals used and by the narrow transect of the variability analyzed. In this article we propose the use of a multi-progeny mapping strategy that used pedigree information and Bayesian approaches that supports a more precise and complete survey of the available genetic variability. RESULTS: Seven key agronomic characters (data from 1 to 3 years) were analyzed in 18 progenies from crosses between occidental commercial genotypes and various exotic lines including accessions of other Prunus species. A total of 1467 plants from these progenies were genotyped with a 9 k SNP array. Forty-seven QTLs were identified, 22 coinciding with major genes and QTLs that have been consistently found in the same populations when studied individually and 25 were new. A substantial part of the QTLs observed (47%) would not have been detected in crosses between only commercial materials, showing the high value of exotic lines as a source of novel alleles for the commercial gene pool. Our strategy also provided estimations on the narrow sense heritability of each character, and the estimation of the QTL genotypes of each parent for the different QTLs and their breeding value. CONCLUSIONS: The integrated strategy used provides a broader and more accurate picture of the variability available for peach breeding with the identification of many new QTLs, information on the sources of the alleles of interest and the breeding values of the potential donors of such valuable alleles. These results are first-hand information for breeders and a step forward towards the implementation of DNA-informed strategies to facilitate selection of new cultivars with improved productivity and quality.
BACKGROUND:Peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) is a major temperate fruit crop with an intense breeding activity. Breeding is facilitated by knowledge of the inheritance of the key traits that are often of a quantitative nature. QTLs have traditionally been studied using the phenotype of a single progeny (usually a full-sib progeny) and the correlation with a set of markers covering its genome. This approach has allowed the identification of various genes and QTLs but is limited by the small numbers of individuals used and by the narrow transect of the variability analyzed. In this article we propose the use of a multi-progeny mapping strategy that used pedigree information and Bayesian approaches that supports a more precise and complete survey of the available genetic variability. RESULTS: Seven key agronomic characters (data from 1 to 3 years) were analyzed in 18 progenies from crosses between occidental commercial genotypes and various exotic lines including accessions of other Prunus species. A total of 1467 plants from these progenies were genotyped with a 9 k SNP array. Forty-seven QTLs were identified, 22 coinciding with major genes and QTLs that have been consistently found in the same populations when studied individually and 25 were new. A substantial part of the QTLs observed (47%) would not have been detected in crosses between only commercial materials, showing the high value of exotic lines as a source of novel alleles for the commercial gene pool. Our strategy also provided estimations on the narrow sense heritability of each character, and the estimation of the QTL genotypes of each parent for the different QTLs and their breeding value. CONCLUSIONS: The integrated strategy used provides a broader and more accurate picture of the variability available for peach breeding with the identification of many new QTLs, information on the sources of the alleles of interest and the breeding values of the potential donors of such valuable alleles. These results are first-hand information for breeders and a step forward towards the implementation of DNA-informed strategies to facilitate selection of new cultivars with improved productivity and quality.
Authors: Elisabeth Dirlewanger; Enrique Graziano; Tarek Joobeur; Francesc Garriga-Calderé; Patrick Cosson; Werner Howad; Pere Arús Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-05-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vladimir Shulaev; Schuyler S Korban; Bryon Sosinski; Albert G Abbott; Herb S Aldwinckle; Kevin M Folta; Amy Iezzoni; Dorrie Main; Pere Arús; Abhaya M Dandekar; Kim Lewers; Susan K Brown; Thomas M Davis; Susan E Gardiner; Daniel Potter; Richard E Veilleux Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2008-05-16 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Shenghua Fan; Douglas G Bielenberg; Tetyana N Zhebentyayeva; Gregory L Reighard; William R Okie; Doron Holland; Albert G Abbott Journal: New Phytol Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: C. Etienne; C. Rothan; A. Moing; C. Plomion; C. Bodénès; L. Svanella-Dumas; P. Cosson; V. Pronier; R. Monet; E. Dirlewanger Journal: Theor Appl Genet Date: 2002-05-25 Impact factor: 5.699
Authors: Marco C A M Bink; L Radu Totir; Cajo J F ter Braak; Christopher R Winkler; Martin P Boer; Oscar S Smith Journal: Theor Appl Genet Date: 2012-01-07 Impact factor: 5.699
Authors: Naveen Kalluri; Octávio Serra; José Manuel Donoso; Roger Picañol; Werner Howad; Iban Eduardo; Pere Arús Journal: Hortic Res Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 7.291
Authors: Cassia da Silva Linge; Lichun Cai; Wanfang Fu; John Clark; Margaret Worthington; Zena Rawandoozi; David H Byrne; Ksenija Gasic Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Francois Laurens; Maria José Aranzana; Pere Arus; Daniele Bassi; Marco Bink; Joan Bonany; Andrea Caprera; Luca Corelli-Grappadelli; Evelyne Costes; Charles-Eric Durel; Jehan-Baptiste Mauroux; Hélène Muranty; Nelson Nazzicari; Thierry Pascal; Andrea Patocchi; Andreas Peil; Bénédicte Quilot-Turion; Laura Rossini; Alessandra Stella; Michela Troggio; Riccardo Velasco; Eric van de Weg Journal: Hortic Res Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 6.793
Authors: Filippo Biscarini; Nelson Nazzicari; Marco Bink; Pere Arús; Maria José Aranzana; Ignazio Verde; Sabrina Micali; Thierry Pascal; Benedicte Quilot-Turion; Patrick Lambert; Cassia da Silva Linge; Igor Pacheco; Daniele Bassi; Alessandra Stella; Laura Rossini Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Zena J Rawandoozi; Timothy P Hartmann; Silvia Carpenedo; Ksenija Gasic; Cassia da Silva Linge; Lichun Cai; Eric Van de Weg; David H Byrne Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 3.969