Literature DB >> 12845438

The potential of Prunus davidiana for introgression into peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] assessed by comparative mapping.

M Foulongne1, T Pascal, P Arús, J Kervella.   

Abstract

The potential for introgression of Prunus davidiana, a wild species related to peach, was evaluated with respect to problems of non-Mendelian segregation or suppressed recombination which often hamper breeding processes based on interspecific crosses. Three connected (F1, F2 and BC2) populations, derived from a cross between P. davidiana clone P1908 and the peach cultivar Summergrand were used. The intraspecific map of P. davidiana already established using the F1 progeny was complemented, and two interspecific maps, for the F2 and BC2 progenies, were built with a set of markers selected from the Prunus reference map. With the molecular data collected for the F2 map construction, regions with distorted marker segregation were detected on the genome; one third of all loci deviated significantly from the expected Mendelian ratios. However, some of these distorted segregations were probably not due to the interspecific cross. On linkage group 6, a skewed area under gametic selection was most likely influenced by the self-incompatibility gene of P. davidiana. Using anchor loci, a good colinearity between the three maps built and the Prunus reference map was demonstrated. Comparative mapping also revealed that homologous recombination occurred normally between P. davidiana and the Prunus persica genome. This confirmed the closeness of the two species. Higher recombination rates were generally observed between P. davidiana and P. persica than between Prunus amygdalus and P. persica. The consequences for plant breeding strategy are discussed. The three maps of the F1, F2 and BC2 progenies provide useful tools for QTL detection and marker-assisted selection, as well as for assessing the efficiency of the peach breeding scheme applied to introgress P. davidiana genes into peach cultivated varieties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12845438     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1238-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.574


  21 in total

1.  Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping.

Authors:  K F Manly; R H Cudmore; J M Meer
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  A set of simple-sequence repeat (SSR) markers covering the Prunus genome.

Authors:  M J Aranzana; A Pineda; P Cosson; E Dirlewanger; J Ascasibar; G Cipriani; C D Ryder; R Testolin; A Abbott; G J King; A F Iezzoni; P Arús
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Controlled Introgression of Chromosomes of SOLANUM PENNELLII into LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM: Segregation and Recombination.

Authors:  C M Rick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Segregation distorters.

Authors:  T W Lyttle
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Analysis of genetic recombination in maize populations using molecular markers.

Authors:  L Tulsieram; W A Compton; R Morris; M Thomas-Compton; K Eskridge
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Plant hybridization.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; Shanna E Carney
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars.

Authors:  R Testolin; T Marrazzo; G Cipriani; R Quarta; I Verde; M T Dettori; M Pancaldi; S Sansavini
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.166

8.  Genetics of adaptive radiation in Hawaiian and Cook Islands species of Tetramolopium (Asteraceae). II. Genetic linkage map and its implications for interspecific breeding barriers.

Authors:  R Whitkus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inheritance and genetic mapping of self-incompatibility in Coffea canephora Pierre.

Authors:  P Lashermes; E Couturon; N Moreau; M Paillard; J Louarn
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Detection of segregation distortions in an indica-japonica rice cross using a high-resolution molecular map.

Authors:  Y Harushima; N Kurata; M Yano; Y Nagamura; T Sasaki; Y Minobe; M Nakagahra
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  12 in total

1.  Comparative mapping and marker-assisted selection in Rosaceae fruit crops.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dirlewanger; Enrique Graziano; Tarek Joobeur; Francesc Garriga-Calderé; Patrick Cosson; Werner Howad; Pere Arús
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Microsatellite and AFLP markers in the Prunus persica [L. (Batsch)]xP. ferganensis BC(1)linkage map: saturation and coverage improvement.

Authors:  I Verde; M Lauria; M T Dettori; E Vendramin; C Balconi; S Micali; Y Wang; M T Marrazzo; G Cipriani; H Hartings; R Testolin; A G Abbott; M Motto; R Quarta
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Comparative linkage mapping in the white button mushroom Agaricus bisporus provides foundation for breeding management.

Authors:  Marie Foulongne-Oriol; Rémi Dufourcq; Cathy Spataro; Christine Devesse; Aurélien Broly; Anne Rodier; Jean-Michel Savoie
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 4.  Multiple models for Rosaceae genomics.

Authors:  Vladimir Shulaev; Schuyler S Korban; Bryon Sosinski; Albert G Abbott; Herb S Aldwinckle; Kevin M Folta; Amy Iezzoni; Dorrie Main; Pere Arús; Abhaya M Dandekar; Kim Lewers; Susan K Brown; Thomas M Davis; Susan E Gardiner; Daniel Potter; Richard E Veilleux
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Comparative genome mapping among Picea glauca, P. mariana x P. rubens and P. abies, and correspondence with other Pinaceae.

Authors:  Betty Pelgas; Stéphanie Beauseigle; Virginie Acheré; Sylvain Jeandroz; Jean Bousquet; Nathalie Isabel
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  The Multisite PeachRefPop Collection: A True Cultural Heritage and International Scientific Tool for Fruit Trees.

Authors:  Marco Cirilli; Sabrina Micali; Maria José Aranzana; Pere Arús; Annarosa Babini; Teresa Barreneche; Marco Bink; Celia M Cantin; Angelo Ciacciulli; José Enrique Cos-Terrer; Pavlina Drogoudi; Iban Eduardo; Stefano Foschi; Daniela Giovannini; Walter Guerra; Alessandro Liverani; Igor Pacheco; Thierry Pascal; Benedicte Quilot-Turion; Ignazio Verde; Laura Rossini; Daniele Bassi
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Integrated QTL detection for key breeding traits in multiple peach progenies.

Authors:  José R Hernández Mora; Diego Micheletti; Marco Bink; Eric Van de Weg; Celia Cantín; Nelson Nazzicari; Andrea Caprera; Maria Teresa Dettori; Sabrina Micali; Elisa Banchi; José Antonio Campoy; Elisabeth Dirlewanger; Patrick Lambert; Thierry Pascal; Michela Troggio; Daniele Bassi; Laura Rossini; Ignazio Verde; Bénédicte Quilot-Turion; François Laurens; Pere Arús; Maria José Aranzana
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Chromosomal evolution and patterns of introgression in helianthus.

Authors:  Jessica G Barb; John E Bowers; Sebastien Renaut; Juan I Rey; Steven J Knapp; Loren H Rieseberg; John M Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Analogues of virus resistance genes map to QTLs for resistance to sharka disease in Prunus davidiana.

Authors:  V Decroocq; M Foulongne; P Lambert; O Le Gall; C Mantin; T Pascal; V Schurdi-Levraud; J Kervella
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2005-01-22       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Mutation rate analysis via parent-progeny sequencing of the perennial peach. II. No evidence for recombination-associated mutation.

Authors:  Long Wang; Yanchun Zhang; Chao Qin; Dacheng Tian; Sihai Yang; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.