Sherine El-Toukhy1, Melanie Sabado1, Kelvin Choi1. 1. Division of Intramural Research, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: We examined trends in seven mutually exclusive tobacco product use patterns (T-PUPs) in nationally representative samples of U.S. youth over time and age. Methods: We used time varying effect modeling on National Youth Tobacco Surveys, 1999-2014 (N = 38662, 9-17 years, M = 15.02). Regression coefficients were estimated as a non-parametric function of time. T-PUPs were cigarette only, non-cigarette combustible only, noncombustible only, non-cigarette combustible and noncombustible dual, cigarette and noncombustible dual, cigarette and non-cigarette combustible dual, and POLY (i.e. cigarettes, non-cigarette combustibles, and noncombustibles) use. Results: Among youth tobacco users, cigarette only use was the predominant T-PUP from 1999 to 2010. After 2010 and 2013, non-cigarette combustible only (AOR 1.38, CI = 1.02-1.87) and noncombustible only (AOR 1.57, CI = 1.00-2.45) use became more prevalent than cigarette only use. In 2011, dual and POLY T-PUPs were on the rise although not significantly different from cigarette only use. Cigarette only use was the predominant T-PUP among 11- to 17-year-old tobacco users. Non-cigarette combustible only (AOR 0.14, CI = 0.10-0.19), noncombustible only (AOR 0.01, CI = 0.008-0.02), non-cigarette combustible and noncombustible (AOR 0.01, CI = 0.01-0.03), cigarette and noncombustible (AOR 0.02, CI = 0.01-0.04), cigarette and non-cigarette combustible (AOR 0.32, CI = 0.24-0.43), and POLY (AOR 0.02, CI = 0.01-0.04) use were less prevalent than cigarette only use at age 17. Conclusions: Non-cigarette, dual, and POLY T-PUPs are rising among youth tobacco users. Screening for all tobacco use and delivering treatment during pediatrician visits should be standard clinical practice. Implications: Tracking trends in tobacco product use patterns (T-PUPs) over time and age is necessary to achieve Healthy People 2020 goal of reducing tobacco use among youth. Trends over time show a rise of non-cigarette T-PUPs especially noncombustible products but cigarette only use remains the most prevalent among 11- to 17-year-old tobacco users. The recent extension of FDA's regulatory jurisdiction over all tobacco products (e.g. e-cigarettes, hookah) is a step toward comprehensive tobacco control especially among youth. Public health practitioners should extend prevention and cessation efforts among youth to T-PUPs beyond exclusive cigarette smoking.
Introduction: We examined trends in seven mutually exclusive tobacco product use patterns (T-PUPs) in nationally representative samples of U.S. youth over time and age. Methods: We used time varying effect modeling on National Youth Tobacco Surveys, 1999-2014 (N = 38662, 9-17 years, M = 15.02). Regression coefficients were estimated as a non-parametric function of time. T-PUPs were cigarette only, non-cigarette combustible only, noncombustible only, non-cigarette combustible and noncombustible dual, cigarette and noncombustible dual, cigarette and non-cigarette combustible dual, and POLY (i.e. cigarettes, non-cigarette combustibles, and noncombustibles) use. Results: Among youth tobacco users, cigarette only use was the predominant T-PUP from 1999 to 2010. After 2010 and 2013, non-cigarette combustible only (AOR 1.38, CI = 1.02-1.87) and noncombustible only (AOR 1.57, CI = 1.00-2.45) use became more prevalent than cigarette only use. In 2011, dual and POLY T-PUPs were on the rise although not significantly different from cigarette only use. Cigarette only use was the predominant T-PUP among 11- to 17-year-old tobacco users. Non-cigarette combustible only (AOR 0.14, CI = 0.10-0.19), noncombustible only (AOR 0.01, CI = 0.008-0.02), non-cigarette combustible and noncombustible (AOR 0.01, CI = 0.01-0.03), cigarette and noncombustible (AOR 0.02, CI = 0.01-0.04), cigarette and non-cigarette combustible (AOR 0.32, CI = 0.24-0.43), and POLY (AOR 0.02, CI = 0.01-0.04) use were less prevalent than cigarette only use at age 17. Conclusions: Non-cigarette, dual, and POLY T-PUPs are rising among youth tobacco users. Screening for all tobacco use and delivering treatment during pediatrician visits should be standard clinical practice. Implications: Tracking trends in tobacco product use patterns (T-PUPs) over time and age is necessary to achieve Healthy People 2020 goal of reducing tobacco use among youth. Trends over time show a rise of non-cigarette T-PUPs especially noncombustible products but cigarette only use remains the most prevalent among 11- to 17-year-old tobacco users. The recent extension of FDA's regulatory jurisdiction over all tobacco products (e.g. e-cigarettes, hookah) is a step toward comprehensive tobacco control especially among youth. Public health practitioners should extend prevention and cessation efforts among youth to T-PUPs beyond exclusive cigarette smoking.
Authors: N Gray; J E Henningfield; N L Benowitz; G N Connolly; C Dresler; K Fagerstrom; M J Jarvis; P Boyle Journal: Tob Control Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Bridget K Ambrose; Brian L Rostron; Sarah E Johnson; David B Portnoy; Benjamin J Apelberg; Annette R Kaufman; Conrad J Choiniere Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Dana Lauterstein; Risa Hoshino; Terry Gordon; Beverly-Xaviera Watkins; Michael Weitzman; Judith Zelikoff Journal: Curr Drug Abuse Rev Date: 2014
Authors: Craig J Slawecki; Annika K Thorsell; Aram El Khoury; Aleksander A Mathé; Cindy L Ehlers Journal: Neuropeptides Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.286
Authors: Stephen B Fountain; James D Rowan; Brian M Kelley; Amanda R Willey; Eric P Nolley Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Jennifer Cornacchione; Kimberly D Wiseman; Randall Teal; Kathryn E Moracco; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Brian L Rostron; Cindy M Chang; Dana M van Bemmel; Yang Xia; Benjamin C Blount Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: René A Arrazola; Linda J Neff; Sara M Kennedy; Enver Holder-Hayes; Christopher D Jones Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Benjamin W Chaffee; Elizabeth T Couch; Janelle Urata; Stuart A Gansky; Gwen Essex; Jing Cheng Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Terry Gordon; Emma Karey; Meghan E Rebuli; Yael-Natalie H Escobar; Ilona Jaspers; Lung Chi Chen Journal: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 16.459
Authors: Yuliyana Beleva; James Russell Pike; Stephen Miller; Bin Xie; Susan L Ames; Alan W Stacy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Maria Cooper; Lauren R Pacek; Mignonne C Guy; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Patricia Simon; Cassandra Stanton; Grace Kong Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Shyanika W Rose; Allison M Glasser; Yitong Zhou; Tess Boley Cruz; Amy M Cohn; Brianna A Lienemann; M Justin Byron; Li-Ling Huang; Helen I Meissner; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Jennifer B Unger Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: Akash Patel; Jana L Hirschtick; Steven Cook; Bukola Usidame; Ritesh Mistry; David T Levy; Rafael Meza; Nancy L Fleischer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 3.390