Literature DB >> 28582283

Reservoir pressure analysis of aortic blood pressure: an in-vivo study at five locations in humans.

Om Narayan1, Kim H Parker, Justin E Davies, Alun D Hughes, Ian T Meredith, James D Cameron.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The development and propagation of the aortic blood pressure wave remains poorly understood, despite its clear relevance to major organ blood flow and potential association with cardiovascular outcomes. The reservoir pressure model provides a unified description of the dual conduit and reservoir functions of the aorta. Reservoir waveform analysis resolves the aortic pressure waveform into an excess (wave related) and reservoir (compliance related) pressure. The applicability of this model to the pressure waveform as it propagates along the aorta has not been investigated in humans.
METHODS: We analysed invasively acquired high-fidelity aortic pressure waveforms from 40 patients undergoing clinically indicated coronary catheterization. Aortic waveforms were measured using a solid-state pressure catheter at five anatomical sites: the ascending aorta, the transverse aortic arch, the diaphragm, the level of the renal arteries, and at the aortic bifurcation. Ensemble average pressure waveforms were obtained for these sites for each patient and analysed to obtain the reservoir pressure [Pr(t)] and the excess pressure [Px(t)] at each aortic position.
RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure increased at a rate of 2.1 mmHg per site along the aorta, whereas diastolic blood pressure was effectively constant. Maximum Pr decreased only slightly along the aorta (changing by -0.7 mmHg per site), whereas the maximum of Px increased from the proximal to distal aorta (+4.1 mmHg per site; P < 0.001). The time, relative to the start of systolic upstroke, of the occurrence of the maximum excess pressure did not vary along the aorta. Of the parameters used to derive the reservoir pressure waveform the systolic and diastolic rate constants showed divergent changes with the systolic rate constant (ks) decreasing and the diastolic rate constant (kd) increasing along the aorta.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the proposition that the magnitude of the calculated reservoir pressure waveform, despite known changes in aortic structure, is effectively constant throughout the aorta. A progressive increase of excess pressure accounts for the increase in pulse pressure from the proximal to distal aorta. The reservoir pressure rate constants seem to behave as arterial functional parameters. The accompanying decrease in ks and increase in kd are consistent with a progressive decrease in aortic compliance and increase in impedance. The reservoir pressure waveform therefore provides a model that might have utility in understanding the generation of central blood pressure and in specific cases might have clinical utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28582283      PMCID: PMC5581543          DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  22 in total

1.  Late systolic pressure augmentation: role of left ventricular outflow patterns.

Authors:  M Karamanoglu; M P Feneley
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-08

2.  Arterial reservoir-excess pressure and ventricular work.

Authors:  Kim H Parker; Jordi Alastruey; Guy-Bart Stan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Peter S Lacy; Simon M Thom; Kennedy Cruickshank; Alice Stanton; David Collier; Alun D Hughes; H Thurston; Michael O'Rourke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The reservoir-wave paradigm.

Authors:  Alun Hughes; Jiun-Jr Wang; Chris Bouwmeester; Justin Davies; Nigel Shrive; John Tyberg; Kim Parker
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  A meta-analysis of the mechanism of blood pressure change with aging.

Authors:  Arun J Baksi; Thomas A Treibel; Justin E Davies; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Rodney A Foale; Kim H Parker; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Attenuation of wave reflection by wave entrapment creates a "horizon effect" in the human aorta.

Authors:  Justin E Davies; Jordi Alastruey; Darrel P Francis; Nearchos Hadjiloizou; Zachary I Whinnett; Charlotte H Manisty; Jazmin Aguado-Sierra; Keith Willson; Rodney A Foale; Iqbal S Malik; Alun D Hughes; Kim H Parker; Jamil Mayet
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  CrossTalk proposal: Forward and backward pressure waves in the arterial system do represent reality.

Authors:  Nico Westerhof; Berend E Westerhof
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  The case for the reservoir-wave approach.

Authors:  John V Tyberg; J Christopher Bouwmeester; Kim H Parker; Nigel G Shrive; Jiun-Jr Wang
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Waveform dispersion, not reflection, may be the major determinant of aortic pressure wave morphology.

Authors:  Sarah A Hope; David B Tay; Ian T Meredith; James D Cameron
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 10.  Effects of central arterial aging on the structure and function of the peripheral vasculature: implications for end-organ damage.

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-09-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Non-invasive measurement of reservoir pressure parameters from brachial-cuff blood pressure waveforms.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Peng; Martin G Schultz; Dean S Picone; Nathan Dwyer; J Andrew Black; Philip Roberts-Thomson; James E Sharman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 2.  Physiological and clinical insights from reservoir-excess pressure analysis.

Authors:  Matthew K Armstrong; Martin G Schultz; Alun D Hughes; Dean S Picone; James E Sharman
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Adverse influence of bisoprolol on central blood pressure in the upright position: a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study.

Authors:  Lauri Suojanen; Antti Haring; Antti Tikkakoski; Heini Huhtala; Mika Kähönen; Arttu Eräranta; Jukka T Mustonen; Ilkka H Pörsti
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.012

4.  Fabrication of aortic bioprosthesis by decellularization, fibrin glue coating and re-endothelization: a cell scaffold approach.

Authors:  Sonal Walawalkar; Shahdab Almelkar
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2019-10-12

5.  The modified arterial reservoir: An update with consideration of asymptotic pressure (P) and zero-flow pressure (Pzf).

Authors:  Alun D Hughes; Kim H Parker
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 1.617

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.