Literature DB >> 28582270

Conversion for Unfavorable Intraoperative Events Results in Significantly Worse Outcomes During Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Lessons Learned From a Multicenter Review of 2861 Cases.

Mark C Halls1, Federica Cipriani2, Giammauro Berardi3, Leonid Barkhatov4, Panagiotis Lainas5, Mohammed Alzoubi1, Mathieu D'Hondt6, Fernando Rotellar7, Ibrahim Dagher5, Luca Aldrighetti2, Roberto I Troisi3, Bjorn Edwin4, Mohammed Abu Hilal1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors for conversion during laparoscopic liver resection and its effect on patient outcome in a large cohort of patients. Additional analysis of outcomes in patients who required conversion for unfavorable intraoperative findings and conversion for unfavorable intraoperative events will be performed to establish if the cause of conversion effects outcome. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Multiple previous studies demonstrate that laparoscopic liver surgery reduces intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and morbidity while maintaining comparable oncological and survival outcomes when compared with open liver resections. However, limited information is available regarding the possible sequelae of conversion to open surgery, especially with regards to cause of conversion.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 2861 cases from prospectively maintained databases of 7 tertiary liver centers across Europe was performed.
RESULTS: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, previous liver resection(s), resections for malignant lesions, postero-superior location, and the extent of the resection are associated with an increased risk of conversion. Patients who require conversion have longer operations with higher blood loss; a longer HDU and total hospital stay, increased frequency and severity of complications and higher 30- and 90-day mortality. Patients who had an elective conversion for an unfavorable intraoperative finding had better outcomes than patients who had an emergency conversion secondary to an unfavorable intraoperative event in terms of HDU and total hospital stay, severity of complication, and 90-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the risk factors for conversion and suggests that conversion for unfavorable intraoperative events is associated with worse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28582270     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery for large left lateral liver tumors: safety and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Tsung-Han Yang; Jen-Lung Chen; Yih-Jyh Lin; Ying-Jui Chao; Yan-Shen Shan; Hui-Ping Hsu; Zhe-Min Su; Chung-Ching Chou; Yi-Ting Yen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic right hepatectomy using the caudal approach is superior to open right hepatectomy with anterior approach and liver hanging maneuver: a comparison of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Tomoaki Yoh; François Cauchy; Takayuki Kawai; Anne-Sophie Schneck; Bertrand Le Roy; Claire Goumard; Ailton Sepulveda; Safi Dokmak; Olivier Farges; Olivier Scatton; Olivier Soubrane
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic liver resection for large HCC: short- and long-term outcomes in relation to tumor size.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Gabriele Spoletini; Giovanni Vennarecci; Elisa Francone; Mohammed Abu Hilal; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Major Hepatectomy: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness in a High-Volume Center.

Authors:  Federica Cipriani; Francesca Ratti; Arianna Cardella; Marco Catena; Michele Paganelli; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Formal Right and Left Hepatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Francesca Tozzi; Giammauro Berardi; Maaike Vierstraete; Meidai Kasai; Luis Abreu de Carvalho; Marco Vivarelli; Roberto Montalti; Roberto Ivan Troisi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic Liver Resection: Experience of 436 Cases in One Center.

Authors:  Te-Hung Chen; Horng-Ren Yang; Long-Bin Jeng; Shih-Chao Hsu; Chia-Hao Hsu; Chun-Chieh Yeh; Mei-Due Yang; William Tzu-Liang Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Characterization and correction of intraoperative soft tissue deformation in image-guided laparoscopic liver surgery.

Authors:  Jon S Heiselman; Logan W Clements; Jarrod A Collins; Jared A Weis; Amber L Simpson; Sunil K Geevarghese; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-12-14

8.  Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Pure Laparoscopic Versus Hand-Assisted/Hybrid Major Hepatectomy at Two Western Centers.

Authors:  G Fiorentini; F Swaid; F Cipriani; F Ratti; C Heres; A Tsung; L Aldrighetti; D A Geller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Systematic review of perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally-invasive surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Federica Cipriani; Francesca Ratti; Guido Fiorentini; Raffaella Reineke; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 10.  Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nikolaos Machairas; Ioannis D Kostakis; Dimitrios Schizas; Stylianos Kykalos; Nikolaos Nikiteas; Georgios C Sotiropoulos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.