Literature DB >> 28579448

Conversion of Hip Hemiarthroplasty to Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing a Dual-Mobility Construct Compared With Large Femoral Heads.

Brian P Chalmers1, Kevin I Perry1, Arlen D Hanssen1, Mark W Pagnano1, Matthew P Abdel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conversion of hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a historically high, up to 20%, postoperative dislocation rate. As such, dual-mobility (DM) constructs are an attractive option to mitigate this complication. We analyzed survivorship free of revision, complications, and clinical outcomes of hemiarthroplasties conversion to THAs utilizing DM constructs compared with large femoral heads (≥36 mm).
METHODS: Conversion of 16 hemiarthroplasties to THAs with a specific DM construct compared with 13 conversions utilizing large femoral heads (≥36 mm) from 2011 to 2014 were reviewed. Mean age at conversion in the DM group was 75 years (range, 57-93 years); 75% were female. Significantly more patients with a dislocated hemiarthroplasty were converted to DM constructs compared to large femoral heads (44% vs 0%; P = .01). Mean follow-up was 3 years.
RESULTS: Survivorship free of revision was 100% in the DM group compared with 92% in the large femoral head cohort at 2 years (P = .7). One (8%) patient converted to a large femoral head underwent revision to a constrained liner for recurrent dislocations while no patients experienced a postoperative dislocation in the DM group (P = .4). Harris Hip Scores improved from 54 to 82 (P < .01) in the DM group, and from 52 to 86 in the large femoral head group (P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Larger effective femoral heads used during conversion of hemiarthroplasties to THAs resulted in high survivorship free of revision, minimal complications, and excellent clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up. In patients at highest risk for postoperative dislocation, including those with dislocating hemiarthroplasties, DM constructs resulted in no postoperative dislocations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conversion; dislocation; dual-mobility constructs; hip hemiarthroplasty; large femoral heads; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28579448     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Conversion of Hemiarthroplasty to THA Carries an Increased Risk of Reoperation Compared With Primary and Revision THA.

Authors:  William L Bargar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Serum metal ion levels in modular dual mobility acetabular components: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ioannis Gkiatas; Abhinav K Sharma; Alexander Greenberg; Stephen T Duncan; Brian P Chalmers; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-25

3.  In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Wayne Hoskins; Sophia Rainbird; Chelsea Dyer; Stephen E Graves; Roger Bingham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Dual Mobility in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Biomechanics, Indications and Complications-Current Concepts.

Authors:  Nilesh Patil; Prashant Deshmane; Ajit Deshmukh; Christopher Mow
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  The efficacy of dual-mobility cup in preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Matteo Romagnoli; Alberto Grassi; Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Lionel E Lazaro; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Yuan Pai; Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Te-Feng Arthur Chou; Tsan-Wen Huang; Kuo-Chin Huang; Shang-Wen Tsai; Cheng-Fong Chen; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Modular Dual-Mobility Liner Malseating: A Radiographic Analysis.

Authors:  Brian P Chalmers; Jeremy Dubin; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-08-27

8.  Dual-Mobility Constructs in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in High-Risk Patients With Spinal Fusions: Our Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Brian P Chalmers; Marie Syku; Thomas P Sculco; Seth A Jerabek; David J Mayman; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-08-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.