Literature DB >> 28579411

Freeze-only versus fresh embryo transfer in a multicenter matched cohort study: contribution of progesterone and maternal age to success rates.

Ange Wang1, Anthony Santistevan2, Karen Hunter Cohn2, Alan Copperman3, John Nulsen4, Brad T Miller5, Eric Widra6, Lynn M Westphal1, Piraye Yurttas Beim7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates in freeze-only versus fresh transfer cycles.
DESIGN: Retrospective matched cohort study.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Women selected using a matching algorithm for similar distributions of clinical characteristics for a total of 2,910 cycles (1,455 fresh cohort and 1,455 freeze-only cohort). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates were statistically significantly higher in the freeze-only transfer cohort than in the matched fresh transfer cohort: ongoing pregnancy rate for freeze-only was 52.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.4-54.6) and for fresh was 45.3% (95% CI, 42.7-47.9), odds ratio (OR) 1.31 (95% CI, 1.13-1.51). In a stratified analysis, the odds of ongoing pregnancy after freeze-only transfer were statistically significantly higher for women both above and below age 35 with progesterone concentration >1.0 ng/mL (age ≤35: OR 1.38 [1.11-1.71]; age >35: OR 1.73 [1.34-2.24]). For women with progesterone concentration ≤1.0 ng/mL, no statistically significant difference in freeze-only odds of ongoing pregnancy was observed in either age group. The sensitivity analysis revealed that increasing maternal age alone (regardless of progesterone) trended toward a more beneficial effect of freeze-only cycles. A lower progesterone concentration was associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing pregnancy odds for fresh but not freeze-only cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Freeze-only transfer protocols are associated with statistically significantly higher ongoing implantation and pregnancy rates compared with fresh transfer cycles. This effect is most pronounced for cycles with progesterone >1.0 ng/mL at trigger and may also be stronger for older patients.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Controlled ovarian stimulation; cryopreservation; freeze-only; fresh transfer; frozen embryo transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28579411     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  14 in total

1.  Thawing day 3 embryos and culturing to day 5 may be a better method for frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Roni Rahav-Koren; Shmuel Inbar; Netanella Miller; Amir Wiser; Yael Yagur; Chen Berkowitz; Sivan Farladansky-Gershnabel; Adrian Shulman; Arie Berkowitz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Anti-Müllerian hormone in guiding the selection of a freeze-all versus a fresh embryo transfer strategy: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kai-Lun Hu; Rui Yang; Huiyu Xu; Ben W Mol; Rong Li; Rui Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Higher efficiency of frozen embryo transfer in male infertility cases in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Fatih Adanacıoğlu; Zeynep Gözde Tokat; Dürdane Büyükfidan; Hanifi M Özgül; Ferhat I Urunsak; Selahittin Çayan; Turan M Çetin
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-12-01

4.  Live birth and multiple birth rates in US in vitro fertilization treatment using donor oocytes: a comparison of single-embryo transfer and double-embryo transfer.

Authors:  V E Klenov; S L Boulet; R B Mejia; D M Kissin; E Munch; A Mancuso; B J Van Voorhis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Impact of progestin ovarian stimulation on newborn outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irene Zolfaroli; Gemma Arribas Ferriol; Juan-José Hidalgo Mora; Antonio Cano
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Progesterone levels on the human chorionic gonadotropin trigger day affect the pregnancy rates for embryos transferred at different stages of development in both general and selected IVF/ICSI populations.

Authors:  P Merviel; S Bouée; A S Jacamon; J J Chabaud; M T Le Martelot; S Roche; C Rince; H Drapier; A Perrin; D Beauvillard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Correlation between the wide range of tubal pathology discovered by routine hysterosalpingography in a university hospital in Romania and the successful pregnancy rate. A cohort study.

Authors:  R Covali
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

8.  No influence of the indication of freeze-all strategy on subsequent outcome to frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle.

Authors:  T Masschaele; F Vandekerckhove; P De Sutter; J Gerris
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2018-06

9.  A freeze-all strategy does not increase live birth rates in women of advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  K Lattes; S López; M A Checa; M Brassesco; D García; R Vassena
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sooyoung Kim; Younji Lee; Sanghoon Lee; Tak Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.