Literature DB >> 28579195

Provider Perspectives of the Complexities of Follow-Up of Abnormal Mammographic Findings.

Alecia M Fair1, Asher E Beckwitt2, Debra Wujcik3, Consuelo H Wilkins4, Ursula Halmon5, Anthony Disher6, Victoria L Champion7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28579195      PMCID： PMC5653250          DOI： 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN： 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


× No keyword cloud information.
  15 in total

1.  1998 MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) final rule released. American College of Radiology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Radiol Manage       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

2.  Patient satisfaction with the communication of mammographic results before and after the Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998.

Authors:  Aparna Priyanath; Joe Feinglass; Nancy C Dolan; Corinne Haviley; Luz A Venta
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Disparities in adherence to recommended followup on screening mammography: interaction of sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Jadwiga Jodi Strzelczyk; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  Follow-up among women with an abnormal mammogram in an HMO: is it complete, timely, and efficient?

Authors:  R C Burack; M S Simon; M Stano; J George; J Coombs
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care.

Authors:  Eric G Poon; Tejal K Gandhi; Thomas D Sequist; Harvey J Murff; Andrew S Karson; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-08

6.  Crossing the finish line: follow-up of abnormal test results in a multisite community health center.

Authors:  Eric T Chen; Mickey Eder; Nancy C Elder; John Hickner
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Factors associated with adequacy of diagnostic workup after abnormal breast cancer screening results.

Authors:  M Schootman; J Myers-Geadelmann; L Fuortes
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

8.  Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Beyond the mammography quality standards act: measuring the quality of breast cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Garth H Rauscher; Anne Marie Murphy; Jennifer M Orsi; Danielle M Dupuy; Paula M Grabler; Christine B Weldon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Delay in breast cancer: implications for stage at diagnosis and survival.

Authors:  Lee Caplan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.