Literature DB >> 28578168

Neonatal outcomes in fetuses with cardiac anomalies and the impact of delivery route.

Laura I Parikh1, Katherine L Grantz2, Sara N Iqbal2, Chun-Chih Huang3, Helain J Landy4, Melissa H Fries2, Uma M Reddy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congenital fetal cardiac anomalies compromise the most common group of fetal structural anomalies. Several previous reports analyzed all types of fetal cardiac anomalies together without individualized neonatal morbidity outcomes based on cardiac defect. Mode of delivery in cases of fetal cardiac anomalies varies greatly as optimal mode of delivery in these complex cases is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine rates of neonatal outcomes for fetal cardiac anomalies and examine the role of attempted route of delivery on neonatal morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: Gravidas with fetal cardiac anomalies and delivery >34 weeks, excluding stillbirths and aneuploidies (n = 2166 neonates, n = 2701 cardiac anomalies), were analyzed from the Consortium on Safe Labor, a retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records. Cardiac anomalies were determined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and organized based on morphology. Neonates were assigned to each cardiac anomaly classification based on the most severe cardiac defect present. Neonatal outcomes were determined for each fetal cardiac anomaly. Composite neonatal morbidity (serious respiratory morbidity, sepsis, birth trauma, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, and neonatal death) was compared between attempted vaginal delivery and planned cesarean delivery for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis. We used multivariate logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratio for composite neonatal morbidity controlling for race, parity, body mass index, insurance, gestational age, maternal disease, single or multiple anomalies, and maternal drug use.
RESULTS: Most cardiac anomalies were diagnosed postnatally except hypoplastic left heart syndrome, which had a higher prenatal than postnatal detection rate. Neonatal death occurred in 8.4% of 107 neonates with conotruncal defects. Serious respiratory morbidity occurred in 54.2% of 83 neonates with left ventricular outflow tract defects. Overall, 76.3% of pregnancies with fetal cardiac anomalies underwent attempted vaginal delivery. Among patients who underwent attempted vaginal delivery, 66.1% had a successful vaginal delivery. Women with a fetal cardiac anomaly diagnosed prenatally were more likely to have a planned cesarean delivery than women with a postnatal diagnosis (31.7 vs 22.8%; P < .001). Planned cesarean delivery compared to attempted vaginal delivery was not associated with decreased composite neonatal morbidity for all prenatally diagnosed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-3.30) or postnatally diagnosed (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.27) cardiac anomalies.
CONCLUSION: Most fetal cardiac anomalies were diagnosed postnatally and associated with increased rates of neonatal morbidity. Planned cesarean delivery for prenatally diagnosed cardiac anomalies was not associated with less neonatal morbidity.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal cardiac anomalies; mode of delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28578168      PMCID: PMC5793863          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  21 in total

1.  Seeking causes: Classifying and evaluating congenital heart defects in etiologic studies.

Authors:  Lorenzo D Botto; Angela E Lin; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Sadia Malik; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2007-10

Review 2.  Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  B J Holland; J A Myers; C R Woods
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Impact of pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus on congenital anomalies, Canada, 2002-2012.

Authors:  S Liu; J Rouleau; J A León; R Sauve; K S Joseph; J G Ray
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Timing and Mode of Delivery in Prenatally Diagnosed Congenital Heart Disease- an Analysis of Practices within the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC).

Authors:  Shabnam Peyvandi; Tina Ahn Thu Thi Nguyen; Myriam Almeida-Jones; Nina Boe; Laila Rhee; Tracy Anton; Mark Sklansky; Maryam Tarsa; Gary Satou; Anita J Moon-Grady
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Impact of change in delivery practice on neonatal and maternal outcomes in cases of significant congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Nina M Dadlez; Sara G Brubaker; Lynn L Simpson; Betul Yilmaz; Ismée A Williams
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries.

Authors:  E Garne; C Stoll; M Clementi
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in a regional controlled case study.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Rossier; Yvan Mivelaz; Marie-Claude Addor; Nicole Sekarski; Erik Jan Meijboom; Yvan Vial
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Neonatal mortality by attempted route of delivery in early preterm birth.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Jun Zhang; Liping Sun; Zhen Chen; Tonse N K Raju; S Katherine Laughon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The importance of nomenclature for congenital cardiac disease: implications for research and evaluation.

Authors:  Matthew J Strickland; Tiffany J Riehle-Colarusso; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Mark D Reller; William T Mahle; Lorenzo D Botto; Paige E Tolbert; Marshall L Jacobs; Francois G Lacour-Gayet; Christo I Tchervenkov; Constantine Mavroudis; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.093

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fetal congenital heart disease - mode of delivery and obstetrical complications.

Authors:  Keren Zloto; Alyssa Hochberg; Kinneret Tenenbaum-Gavish; Alexandra Berezowsky; Shiri Barbash-Hazan; Ron Bardin; Eran Hadar; Anat Shmueli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Machine learning guided postnatal gestational age assessment using new-born screening metabolomic data in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Sunil Sazawal; Kelli K Ryckman; Sayan Das; Abdullah H Baqui; Fyezah Jehan; Usha Dhingra; Rajiv Bahl; Rasheda Khanam; Imran Nisar; Elizabeth Jasper; Arup Dutta; Sayedur Rahman; Usma Mehmood; Bruce Bedell; Saikat Deb; Nabidul Haque Chowdhury; Amina Barkat; Harshita Mittal; Salahuddin Ahmed; Farah Khalid; Rubhana Raqib; Alexander Manu; Sachiyo Yoshida; Muhammad Ilyas; Ambreen Nizar; Said Mohammed Ali
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Delivery Outcome of Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease-Is It Influenced by Prenatal Diagnosis?

Authors:  Alina Weissmann-Brenner; Noam Domniz; Raanan Meyer; Tal Weissbach; Tal Elkan; Yishai Salem; Yossi Bart; Eran Kassif; Boaz Weisz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation.

Authors:  Sunil Sazawal; Kelli K Ryckman; Harshita Mittal; Rasheda Khanam; Imran Nisar; Elizabeth Jasper; Sayedur Rahman; Usma Mehmood; Sayan Das; Bruce Bedell; Nabidul Haque Chowdhury; Amina Barkat; Arup Dutta; Saikat Deb; Salahuddin Ahmed; Farah Khalid; Rubhana Raqib; Muhammad Ilyas; Ambreen Nizar; Said Mohammed Ali; Alexander Manu; Sachiyo Yoshida; Abdullah H Baqui; Fyezah Jehan; Usha Dhingra; Rajiv Bahl
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.413

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.