Literature DB >> 25371936

Impact of change in delivery practice on neonatal and maternal outcomes in cases of significant congenital heart disease.

Nina M Dadlez1, Sara G Brubaker, Lynn L Simpson, Betul Yilmaz, Ismée A Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because of data published in 2009 demonstrating improved outcomes among early- vs. late-term infants,practice shifted toward delivering infants at later gestational ages. We examined the effects of this change on neonates with congenital heart disease.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. Neonates with congenital heart disease born between 2004 and 2008 were compared with those born in 2010. Patients born in 2009, considered to be a transitional year, were excluded.
SETTING: Our study was conducted at a tertiary care level 4 neonatal intensive care unit with comprehensive cardiac service. PATIENTS: Study subjects consisted of neonates with significant congenital heart disease admitted between 2004 and 2010. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes measures consisted of mode of delivery, length of stay, neonatal morbidity, and mortality.
RESULTS: There were 878 infants with congenital heart disease born in 2004-2008 and 124 in 2010. The mean gestational age was higher in 2010 than in 2004-2008 (38.4 ± 1.9 vs. 37.8 ± 2.3 weeks, P = .001), and there were fewer preterm births in 2010 compared with 2004-2008 (P = .003, odds ratio [OR] = 0.4). Mean birth weight was also higher in 2010 (3134 ± 675 vs. 2975 ± 599 g, P = .008). In 2010, less than half as many infants were born via scheduled induction (P < .001, OR = 0.2) or scheduled cesarean delivery (P = .002, OR = 0.4) as in 2004-2008. However, in 2010, there were more urgent inductions (P = .002, OR = 3.1), cesarean deliveries after labor (P = .01, OR = 2.2),and unplanned cesarean deliveries in general (P = .02, OR = 1.7) compared with 2004-2008. In 2010, neonates were less likely to require preoperative vasopressors (P = .002), but there were no differences in 5 minutes APGAR,antibiotic administration, preoperative intubation, median length of stay, or mortality compared with 2004-2008.Conclusions. Despite increased gestational age and birth weight following the shift in delivery practice, there was no difference in length of stay, neonatal morbidity, or mortality in infants with congenital heart disease. The resultant increase in urgent cesarean delivery and urgent inductions may confer additional maternal morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25371936      PMCID: PMC4221808          DOI: 10.1111/chd.12167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis        ISSN: 1747-079X            Impact factor:   2.007


  9 in total

1.  Neonatal outcomes after implementation of guidelines limiting elective delivery before 39 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Deborah B Ehrenthal; Matthew K Hoffman; Xiaozhang Jiang; Gordon Ostrum
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Academic achievement varies with gestational age among children born at term.

Authors:  Kimberly G Noble; William P Fifer; Virginia A Rauh; Yoko Nomura; Howard F Andrews
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Kathy J Jenkins; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Jane W Newburger; Thomas L Spray; James H Moller; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Birth before 39 weeks' gestation is associated with worse outcomes in neonates with heart disease.

Authors:  John M Costello; Angelo Polito; David W Brown; Thomas F McElrath; Dionne A Graham; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Emile A Bacha; Catherine K Allan; Jennifer N Cohen; Peter C Laussen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Variation in child cognitive ability by week of gestation among healthy term births.

Authors:  Seungmi Yang; Robert W Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Perinatal outcomes in low-risk term pregnancies: do they differ by week of gestation?

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; James M Nicholson; Sanae Nakagawa; Tim A Bruckner; A Eugene Washington; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Outcome after preterm delivery of infants antenatally diagnosed with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  R E Andrews; J M Simpson; G K Sharland; I D Sullivan; R W M Yates
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Incidence of early neonatal mortality and morbidity after late-preterm and term cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Roberta De Luca; Michel Boulvain; Olivier Irion; Michel Berner; Riccardo Erennio Pfister
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Yinglei Lai; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Improving maternal-infant bonding after prenatal diagnosis of CHD.

Authors:  Piers C A Barker; Gregory H Tatum; Michael J Campbell; Michael G W Camitta; Angelo S Milazzo; Christoph P Hornik; Amanda French; Stephen G Miller
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 1.093

2.  Neonatal outcomes in fetuses with cardiac anomalies and the impact of delivery route.

Authors:  Laura I Parikh; Katherine L Grantz; Sara N Iqbal; Chun-Chih Huang; Helain J Landy; Melissa H Fries; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 8.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.