David J Goldberg1, Victor Zak2, Bryan H Goldstein3, Shan Chen2, Michelle S Hamstra3, Elizabeth A Radojewski4, Eileen Maunsell2, Seema Mital4, Shaji C Menon5, Kurt R Schumacher6, R Mark Payne7, Mario Stylianou8, Jonathan R Kaltman8, Tina M deVries9, James L Yeager9, Stephen M Paridon10. 1. Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: goldbergda@email.chop.edu. 2. New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH. 4. Division of Cardiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. 5. Division of Cardiology, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT. 6. Division of Cardiology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI. 7. Division of Cardiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN. 8. Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD. 9. Consultant to Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd., Mezzion Pharma Co. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea. 10. Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Fontan operation results in a circulation that is dependent on low pulmonary vascular resistance to maintain an adequate cardiac output. Medical therapies that lower pulmonary vascular resistance may augment cardiac output and improve long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This phase I/II clinical trial conducted by the Pediatric Heart Network was designed to evaluate short-term safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of udenafil in adolescents following Fontan. METHODS: A 5-day dose-escalation trial was conducted in five study cohorts of six subjects each (37.5, 87.5, and 125 mg daily, 37.5 and 87.5 mg by mouth twice daily). A control cohort with 6 subjects underwent exercise testing only. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded, PK samples were collected on study days six through eight, and clinical testing was performed at baseline and day five. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 36 subjects; mean age 15.8 years (58% male). There were no significant differences in subject characteristics between cohorts. No drug-related serious AEs were reported during the study period; 24 subjects had AEs possibly or probably related to study drug. Headache was the most common AE, occurring in 20 of 30 subjects. The 87.5 mg bid cohort was well tolerated, achieved the highest maximal concentration (506 ng/mL) and the highest average concentration over the dosing interval (279 ng/mL), and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. Exercise performance did not improve in any of the dosing cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Udenafil was well-tolerated at all dosing levels. The 87.5 mg bid cohort achieved the highest plasma drug level and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. These data suggest that the 87.5 mg bid regimen may be the most appropriate for a Phase III clinical trial.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Fontan operation results in a circulation that is dependent on low pulmonary vascular resistance to maintain an adequate cardiac output. Medical therapies that lower pulmonary vascular resistance may augment cardiac output and improve long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This phase I/II clinical trial conducted by the Pediatric Heart Network was designed to evaluate short-term safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of udenafil in adolescents following Fontan. METHODS: A 5-day dose-escalation trial was conducted in five study cohorts of six subjects each (37.5, 87.5, and 125 mg daily, 37.5 and 87.5 mg by mouth twice daily). A control cohort with 6 subjects underwent exercise testing only. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded, PK samples were collected on study days six through eight, and clinical testing was performed at baseline and day five. RESULTS: The trial enrolled 36 subjects; mean age 15.8 years (58% male). There were no significant differences in subject characteristics between cohorts. No drug-related serious AEs were reported during the study period; 24 subjects had AEs possibly or probably related to study drug. Headache was the most common AE, occurring in 20 of 30 subjects. The 87.5 mg bid cohort was well tolerated, achieved the highest maximal concentration (506 ng/mL) and the highest average concentration over the dosing interval (279 ng/mL), and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. Exercise performance did not improve in any of the dosing cohorts. CONCLUSIONS:Udenafil was well-tolerated at all dosing levels. The 87.5 mg bid cohort achieved the highest plasma drug level and was associated with a suggestion of improvement in myocardial performance. These data suggest that the 87.5 mg bid regimen may be the most appropriate for a Phase III clinical trial.
Authors: Nazzareno Galiè; Hossein A Ghofrani; Adam Torbicki; Robyn J Barst; Lewis J Rubin; David Badesch; Thomas Fleming; Tamiza Parpia; Gary Burgess; Angelo Branzi; Friedrich Grimminger; Marcin Kurzyna; Gérald Simonneau Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bryan H Goldstein; Jessica R Golbus; Angela M Sandelin; Nicole Warnke; Lindsay Gooding; Karen K King; Janet E Donohue; James G Gurney; Caren S Goldberg; Albert P Rocchini; John R Charpie Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Mark J Schuuring; Jeroen C Vis; Arie P J van Dijk; Joost P van Melle; Hubert W Vliegen; Petronella G Pieper; Gertjan T Sieswerda; Rianne H A C M de Bruin-Bon; Barbara J M Mulder; Berto J Bouma Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Jonathan Rhodes; Ana Ubeda-Tikkanen; Mathieu Clair; Susan M Fernandes; Dionne A Graham; Carly E Milliren; Kevin P Daly; Mary P Mullen; Michael J Landzberg Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2013-03-29 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Anders Hebert; Ulla R Mikkelsen; Ulf Thilen; Lars Idorn; Annette S Jensen; Edit Nagy; Katarina Hanseus; Keld E Sørensen; Lars Søndergaard Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Naomi M Hamburg; Michelle J Keyes; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Renate Schnabel; Moira M Pryde; Gary F Mitchell; Jacob Sheffy; Joseph A Vita; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jae-Seung Paick; Sae Woong Kim; Dae Yeol Yang; Ja Jong Kim; Sung Won Lee; Tai Young Ahn; Hyung Ki Choi; Jun-Kyu Suh; Sae Chul Kim Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2008-01-21 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: David J Goldberg; Victor Zak; Bryan H Goldstein; Brian W McCrindle; Shaji C Menon; Kurt R Schumacher; R Mark Payne; Jonathan Rhodes; Kimberly E McHugh; Daniel J Penny; Felicia Trachtenberg; Michelle S Hamstra; Marc E Richmond; Peter C Frommelt; Matthew D Files; James L Yeager; Victoria L Pemberton; Mario P Stylianou; Gail D Pearson; Stephen M Paridon Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: David J Goldberg; Victor Zak; Bryan H Goldstein; Kurt R Schumacher; Jonathan Rhodes; Daniel J Penny; Christopher J Petit; Salil Ginde; Shaji C Menon; Seong-Ho Kim; Gi Beom Kim; Todd T Nowlen; Michael V DiMaria; Benjamin P Frischhertz; Jonathan B Wagner; Kimberly E McHugh; Brian W McCrindle; Amanda J Shillingford; Arash A Sabati; Anji T Yetman; Anitha S John; Marc E Richmond; Matthew D Files; R Mark Payne; Andrew S Mackie; Christopher K Davis; Shabana Shahanavaz; Kevin D Hill; Ruchira Garg; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Michelle S Hamstra; Stacy Woyciechowski; Kathleen A Rathge; Michael G McBride; Peter C Frommelt; Mark W Russell; Elaine M Urbina; James L Yeager; Victoria L Pemberton; Mario P Stylianou; Gail D Pearson; Stephen M Paridon Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-11-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Anastacia M Garcia; Stephanie J Nakano; Anis Karimpour-Fard; Karin Nunley; Penny Blain-Nelson; Natalie M Stafford; Brian L Stauffer; Carmen C Sucharov; Shelley D Miyamoto Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 8.790