Literature DB >> 28577198

Heart disease versus cancer: understanding perceptions of population prevalence and personal risk.

Jennifer K Scheideler1, Jennifer M Taber2, Rebecca A Ferrer3, Emily G Grenen4, William M P Klein3.   

Abstract

Although the gap is narrowing, Americans are more likely to be diagnosed with and die from heart disease than cancer, and yet many believe cancer is more common and their personal risk of cancer is higher than their heart disease risk. Using nationally representative 2013 Health Information National Trends Survey data, we assessed such beliefs and examined sociodemographic and psychological factors and health behaviors associated with these beliefs. 42.8% of participants rated cancer as more common and 78.5% rated their own cancer risk as equal to or exceeding their heart disease risk. These misperceptions were only modestly correlated. Beliefs about relative population risk were associated with various psychological factors, whereas beliefs about relative personal risk were not. Both beliefs were inconsistently associated with health behaviors. Accuracy in beliefs about cancer and heart disease relative risk and prevalence is low and future research should explore antecedents and consequences of these beliefs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambiguity; Cancer; Fatalism; Health Information National Trends Survey; Heart disease; Prevalence; Risk perceptions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28577198     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-017-9860-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  33 in total

1.  Associations between perceived cancer risk and established risk factors in a national community sample.

Authors:  Keiko Honda; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2004

2.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Kathy A Lee; Noreen C Facione; Marylin J Dodd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  The case for motivated reasoning.

Authors:  Z Kunda
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Passing years, changing fears? Conceptualizing and measuring risk perceptions for chronic disease in younger and middle-aged women.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Marci Lobel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2011-04-13

5.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

6.  Perception of risk.

Authors:  P Slovic
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Risk perceptions and health behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca Ferrer; William M Klein
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2015-10-01

Review 8.  Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Authors:  Paschal Sheeran; Peter R Harris; Tracy Epton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Components of family history associated with women's disease perceptions for cancer: a report from the Family Healthware™ Impact Trial.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein; Suzanne M O'neill; Nan Rothrock; Erin J Starzyk; Jennifer L Beaumont; Louise S Acheson; Catharine Wang; Robert Gramling; James M Galliher; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Risk of 26 Types of Cancer in 1.44 Million Adults.

Authors:  Steven C Moore; I-Min Lee; Elisabete Weiderpass; Peter T Campbell; Joshua N Sampson; Cari M Kitahara; Sarah K Keadle; Hannah Arem; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Patricia Hartge; Hans-Olov Adami; Cindy K Blair; Kristin B Borch; Eric Boyd; David P Check; Agnès Fournier; Neal D Freedman; Marc Gunter; Mattias Johannson; Kay-Tee Khaw; Martha S Linet; Nicola Orsini; Yikyung Park; Elio Riboli; Kim Robien; Catherine Schairer; Howard Sesso; Michael Spriggs; Roy Van Dusen; Alicja Wolk; Charles E Matthews; Alpa V Patel
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  4 in total

1.  Adaptive memory and evolution of the human naturalistic mind: Insights from the use of medicinal plants.

Authors:  Risoneide Henriques da Silva; Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior; Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros; Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A qualitative study of perceptions of control over potential causes of death and the sources of information that inform perceptions of risk.

Authors:  Richard Brown; Elizabeth Sillence; Gillian Pepper
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2022-07-29

3.  Memory for medicinal plants remains in ancient and modern environments suggesting an evolved adaptedness.

Authors:  Joelson Moreno Brito Moura; Risoneide Henriques da Silva; Washington Soares Ferreira Júnior; Taline Cristina da Silva; Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Decision Science Can Inform Clinical Trade-Offs Regarding Cardiotoxic Cancer Treatments.

Authors:  Arielle S Gillman; Jacqueline B Vo; Anju Nohria; Rebecca A Ferrer
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-06-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.