Literature DB >> 28577024

Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.

Esra Erkoc Ataoglu1, Hale Batur Caglayan2, Bülent Cengiz3,4.   

Abstract

Motor cortex activity level is a critical part of the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability. Based on homeostatic plasticity, the state of the stimulated cortical area influences the direction of neuroplastic changes induced by stimuli. Owing to homeostatic plasticity, cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) would likely have a pronounced inhibitory effect on corticomotor excitability during a motor task, compared with the resting state. To test this hypothesis, we detected motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude changes before and during c-tDCS with voluntary movement. Twelve healthy right-handed volunteers (9 males, 27-48 years) were enrolled in the study. Subjects performed little finger abduction motor task. Passive (APB) and active (ADM) muscles were studied. MEP amplitudes were measured during resting (baseline) and movement stages, and subsequently with the contralateral M1 modulated by c-tDCS. c-tDCS caused reduced baseline MEP amplitude in the ADM (p < 0.05) and APB (p < 0.001) muscles. Sham stimulation had no effect on the baseline MEP amplitudes. MEP amplitude ratio (MEP amplitude triggered by movement/baseline MEP amplitude) was higher during c-tDCS than before c-tDCS (p < 0.01). Our results suggested that during voluntary contraction, c-tDCS has an opposite effect on corticospinal excitability compared with resting state modulation effect. This contrast effect could be related to modulation of movement preparation and execution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corticomotor excitability; Motor evoked potential; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Voluntary movement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28577024     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5001-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention.

Authors:  Katja Stefan; Matthias Wycislo; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity.

Authors:  O D CREUTZFELDT; G H FROMM; H KAPP
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Antje Seeber; Kai Frommann; Cornelia Carmen Klein; Christian Rochford; Maren S Nitsche; Kristina Fricke; David Liebetanz; Nicolas Lang; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation.

Authors:  Janine Reis; Heidi M Schambra; Leonardo G Cohen; Ethan R Buch; Brita Fritsch; Eric Zarahn; Pablo A Celnik; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: before, during, or after motor training?

Authors:  Maria E Cabral; Adriana Baltar; Rebeka Borba; Silvana Galvão; Luciana Santos; Felipe Fregni; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 8.  Controversy: Noninvasive and invasive cortical stimulation show efficacy in treating stroke patients.

Authors:  Friedhelm C Hummel; Pablo Celnik; Alvero Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni; Winston D Byblow; Cathrin M Buetefisch; John Rothwell; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning.

Authors:  C J Stagg; G Jayaram; D Pastor; Z T Kincses; P M Matthews; H Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity.

Authors:  Nadia Bolognini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the role of the left DLPFC in fatigue during unresisted rhythmic movements.

Authors:  Aranza Vila-Villar; Mariña Naya-Fernández; Antonio Madrid; Elena Madinabeitia-Mancebo; Verónica Robles-García; Javier Cudeiro; Pablo Arias
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.348

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.