Literature DB >> 28576578

Understanding solid-phase HLA antibody assays and the value of MFI.

Harold C Sullivan1, Howard M Gebel2, Robert A Bray3.   

Abstract

As the practice of medicine becomes more reliant on imaging and laboratory tests, medical decisions will be increasingly based on numbers. Accordingly, following the introduction of solid-phase testing to the HLA testing repertoire, laboratory directors and physicians have employed preset mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) thresholds as the basis for decisions in the management of transplant patients. However, what do MFI values mean? The literature is rife with reports detailing numerous factors that influence antibody assessment including (but not limited to) sensitization history of the patient, level of mismatch between donor and recipient, presence of interfering substances in the serum, whether the antigen on multiplex beads is native or denatured, day-to-day and technologist variability, and the historical performance of an assay in a given institution. How are these variables incorporated into the interpretation of MFI values? Herein, the pitfalls and complexities of single antigen bead (SAB) testing and interpretation are discussed with specific attention to what can and cannot be inferred by MFI.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C1q; HLA; MFI; SAB; Solid phase single antigen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28576578     DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2017.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Immunol        ISSN: 0198-8859            Impact factor:   2.850


  10 in total

Review 1.  Outstanding questions in transplantation: B cells, alloantibodies, and humoral rejection.

Authors:  Anita S Chong; David M Rothstein; Kassem Safa; Leonardo V Riella
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  The utility of second single antigen bead assay: Clearing the water or stirring up mud?

Authors:  Harold C Sullivan; Scott M Krummey; Howard M Gebel; Robert A Bray
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.850

3.  Identification of a recurrent pattern of false-positivity by Luminex HLA MHC class I single antigen bead testing.

Authors:  Christina L Dean; Scott M Krummey; Howard M Gebel; Robert A Bray; Harold C Sullivan
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.850

4.  The impact of belatacept on third-party HLA alloantibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Ronald F Parsons; Arslan Zahid; Shalini Bumb; Hannah Decker; Harold C Sullivan; Frances Eun-Hyung Lee; Idelberto Raul Badell; Mandy L Ford; Christian P Larsen; Thomas C Pearson; Annette M Jackson; Dong-Feng Chen; Matthew Levine; Malek Kamoun; Robert A Bray; Howard M Gebel
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor-specific antibody levels after belatacept- versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT.

Authors:  R A Bray; H M Gebel; R Townsend; M E Roberts; M Polinsky; L Yang; H-U Meier-Kriesche; C P Larsen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  De novo donor-specific antibodies in belatacept-treated vs cyclosporine-treated kidney-transplant recipients: Post hoc analyses of the randomized phase III BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies.

Authors:  R A Bray; H M Gebel; R Townsend; M E Roberts; M Polinsky; L Yang; H-U Meier-Kriesche; C P Larsen
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Comparison of Physical Crossmatch and Virtual Crossmatch to Identify Preexisting Donor-Specific Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Antibodies and Outcome Following Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Bo Peng; Quan Zhuang; Meng Yu; Junhui Li; Yun Liu; Lijun Zhu; Yingzi Ming
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-02-03

8.  Effects of immunotherapy induction on outcome and graft survival of kidney-transplanted patients with different immunological risk of rejection.

Authors:  Marcus Faria Lasmar; Rodrigo Santana Dutra; José Augusto Nogueira-Machado; Raquel A Fabreti-Oliveira; Raquel Gomes Siqueira; Evaldo Nascimento
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 9.  Strategies to Overcome HLA Sensitization and Improve Access to Retransplantation after Kidney Graft Loss.

Authors:  Rita Leal; Clara Pardinhas; António Martinho; Helena Oliveira Sá; Arnaldo Figueiredo; Rui Alves
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Treatment of allosensitized patients receiving allogeneic transplantation.

Authors:  Stefan O Ciurea; Monzr M Al Malki; Piyanuch Kongtim; Jun Zou; Fleur M Aung; Gabriela Rondon; Julianne Chen; Michiko Taniguchi; Salman Otoukesh; Auayporn Nademanee; Stephen J Forman; Richard Champlin; Ketevan Gendzekhadze; Kai Cao
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-10-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.