Jerome A Leis1,2,3, Lesley Palmay4, Grace Ho5, Sumit Raybardhan6, Suzanne Gill5, Tiffany Kan6, Jackie Campbell4,7, Alex Kiss2, Janine B McCready1,5, Pavani Das1,6, Brian Minnema1,6, Jeff E Powis1,3,5, Sandra A N Walker4, Heather Ferguson8, Benny Wong6,9, Elizabeth Weber7,9. 1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine. 2. Sunnybrook Research Institute and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation. 3. Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, and. 4. Department of Pharmacy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and Lesley Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto. 5. Michael Garron Hospital. 6. North York General Hospital. 7. Drug Safety Clinic, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre ; and. 8. Drug Safety Clinic, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and. 9. Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Background: β-lactam allergy skin testing (BLAST) is recommended by antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) guidelines, yet few studies have systematically evaluated its impact when delivered at point of care. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic multicenter prospective evaluation of the use of point-of-care BLAST by ASPs. In staggered 3-month intervals, ASP teams at 3 hospitals received training by allergists to offer BLAST for eligible patients with infectious diseases receiving nonpreferred therapy due to severity of their reported allergy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving the preferred β-lactam therapy. Results: Of 827 patients with reported β-lactam allergy over 15 months, β-lactam therapy was preferred among 632 (76%). During baseline periods, 50% (124/246) received preferred β-lactam therapy based on history, compared with 60% (232/386) during the intervention periods (P = .02), which improved further to 81% (313/386) upon provision of BLAST (P < .001) without any increase in incidence of adverse drug reactions (4% vs 3%; P = .4). After adjusting for patient variables and the correlation between hospitals, the intervention period was associated with a 4.5-fold greater odds of receiving preferred β-lactam therapy (95% confidence interval, 2.4-8.2; P < .0001). Conclusions: The use of BLAST at the point of care across 3 hospital ASPs resulted in greater use of preferred β-lactam therapy without increasing the risk of adverse drug reactions. Longer-term studies are needed to better assess the safety and clinical impact of this ASP intervention.
Background: β-lactam allergy skin testing (BLAST) is recommended by antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) guidelines, yet few studies have systematically evaluated its impact when delivered at point of care. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic multicenter prospective evaluation of the use of point-of-care BLAST by ASPs. In staggered 3-month intervals, ASP teams at 3 hospitals received training by allergists to offer BLAST for eligible patients with infectious diseases receiving nonpreferred therapy due to severity of their reported allergy. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving the preferred β-lactam therapy. Results: Of 827 patients with reported β-lactam allergy over 15 months, β-lactam therapy was preferred among 632 (76%). During baseline periods, 50% (124/246) received preferred β-lactam therapy based on history, compared with 60% (232/386) during the intervention periods (P = .02), which improved further to 81% (313/386) upon provision of BLAST (P < .001) without any increase in incidence of adverse drug reactions (4% vs 3%; P = .4). After adjusting for patient variables and the correlation between hospitals, the intervention period was associated with a 4.5-fold greater odds of receiving preferred β-lactam therapy (95% confidence interval, 2.4-8.2; P < .0001). Conclusions: The use of BLAST at the point of care across 3 hospital ASPs resulted in greater use of preferred β-lactam therapy without increasing the risk of adverse drug reactions. Longer-term studies are needed to better assess the safety and clinical impact of this ASP intervention.
Authors: Cosby A Stone; Jason Trubiano; David T Coleman; Christine R F Rukasin; Elizabeth J Phillips Journal: Allergy Date: 2019-05-26 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Mary L Staicu; David Vyles; Erica S Shenoy; Cosby A Stone; Taylor Banks; Kristin S Alvarez; Kimberly G Blumenthal Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2020-10
Authors: Nicholas A Turner; Rebekah Moehring; Christina Sarubbi; Rebekah H Wrenn; Richard H Drew; Coleen K Cunningham; Vance G Fowler; Deverick J Anderson Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Kimberly G Blumenthal; Yu Li; Joyce T Hsu; Anna R Wolfson; David N Berkowitz; Victoria A Carballo; Jesse M Schwartz; Kathleen A Marquis; Ramy Elshaboury; Ronak G Gandhi; Barbara B Lambl; Monique M Freeley; Alana Gruszecki; Paige G Wickner; Erica S Shenoy Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 3.254