Cosby A Stone1, Jason Trubiano2,3,4,5, David T Coleman1, Christine R F Rukasin1, Elizabeth J Phillips6,7,8,9. 1. Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases, Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Department of Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 5. The National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 6. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 7. Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee. 8. Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 9. Institute for Immunology & Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Even though 8%-25% of most populations studied globally are labeled as penicillin allergic, most diagnoses of penicillin allergy are made in childhood and relate to events that are either not allergic in nature, are low risk for immediate hypersensitivity, or are a potential true allergy that has waned over time. Penicillin allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broader spectrum antimicrobials and are associated with antimicrobial resistance. They may also delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy and lead to increased risk of specific adverse healthcare outcomes. Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing global focus. METHODS: We performed an evidence-based narrative review of the literature of penicillin allergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillin allergy labels, and current approaches and barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling. Over the period 1928-2018 in Pubmed and Medline, search terms used included "penicillin allergy" or "penicillin hypersensitivity" alone or in combination with "adverse events," "testing," "evaluation," "effects," "label," "de-labeling," "prick or epicutaneous," and "intradermal" skin testing, "oral challenge or provocation," "cross-reactivity," and "antimicrobial stewardship". RESULTS: Penicillin allergy labels are highly prevalent, largely inaccurate and their carriage may lead to unnecessary treatment and inferior outcomes with alternative agents as well as adverse public health outcomes such as antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling as an aspect of ASP has become an increasing global focus. There is a need for validated approaches that optimally combine the use of history and ingestion challenge with or without proceeding formal skin testing to tackle penicillin allergy efficiently within complex healthcare systems. At the same time, there is great promise for penicillin allergy evaluation and de-labeling as an individual and public health strategy to reduce adverse healthcare outcomes, improve antimicrobial stewardship, and decrease healthcare costs.
BACKGROUND: Even though 8%-25% of most populations studied globally are labeled as penicillinallergic, most diagnoses of penicillinallergy are made in childhood and relate to events that are either not allergic in nature, are low risk for immediate hypersensitivity, or are a potential true allergy that has waned over time. Penicillinallergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broader spectrum antimicrobials and are associated with antimicrobial resistance. They may also delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy and lead to increased risk of specific adverse healthcare outcomes. Operationalizing penicillinallergy de-labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing global focus. METHODS: We performed an evidence-based narrative review of the literature of penicillinallergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillinallergy labels, and current approaches and barriers to penicillinallergy de-labeling. Over the period 1928-2018 in Pubmed and Medline, search terms used included "penicillinallergy" or "penicillin hypersensitivity" alone or in combination with "adverse events," "testing," "evaluation," "effects," "label," "de-labeling," "prick or epicutaneous," and "intradermal" skin testing, "oral challenge or provocation," "cross-reactivity," and "antimicrobial stewardship". RESULTS:Penicillinallergy labels are highly prevalent, largely inaccurate and their carriage may lead to unnecessary treatment and inferior outcomes with alternative agents as well as adverse public health outcomes such as antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Operationalizing penicillinallergy de-labeling as an aspect of ASP has become an increasing global focus. There is a need for validated approaches that optimally combine the use of history and ingestion challenge with or without proceeding formal skin testing to tackle penicillinallergy efficiently within complex healthcare systems. At the same time, there is great promise for penicillinallergy evaluation and de-labeling as an individual and public health strategy to reduce adverse healthcare outcomes, improve antimicrobial stewardship, and decrease healthcare costs.
Authors: Kimberly G Blumenthal; Erin E Ryan; Yu Li; Hang Lee; James L Kuhlen; Erica S Shenoy Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Cosby A Stone; Joanna L Stollings; Christopher J Lindsell; Mary Lynn Dear; Reagan B Buie; Todd W Rice; Elizabeth J Phillips Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Mary L Staicu; David Vyles; Erica S Shenoy; Cosby A Stone; Taylor Banks; Kristin S Alvarez; Kimberly G Blumenthal Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2020-10
Authors: David Vyles; James W Antoon; Allison Norton; Cosby A Stone; Jason Trubiano; Alexandra Radowicz; Elizabeth J Phillips Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Chandra Vethody; Roger Yu; Jacob M Keck; Michelle K Onasch; Cosby A Stone; Elizabeth J Phillips Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract Date: 2020-09-20
Authors: Neil S Zheng; Cosby A Stone; Lan Jiang; Christian M Shaffer; V Eric Kerchberger; Cecilia P Chung; QiPing Feng; Nancy J Cox; C Michael Stein; Dan M Roden; Joshua C Denny; Elizabeth J Phillips; Wei-Qi Wei Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 6.020