Literature DB >> 28575004

Comparative chloroplast genomes of eleven Schima (Theaceae) species: Insights into DNA barcoding and phylogeny.

Xiang-Qin Yu1,2, Bryan T Drew3, Jun-Bo Yang1, Lian-Ming Gao2, De-Zhu Li1.   

Abstract

Schima is an ecologically and economically important woody genus in tea family (Theaceae). Unresolved species delimitations and phylogenetic relationships within Schima limit our understanding of the genus and hinder utilization of the genus for economic purposes. In the present study, we conducted comparative analysis among the complete chloroplast (cp) genomes of 11 Schima species. Our results indicate that Schima cp genomes possess a typical quadripartite structure, with conserved genomic structure and gene order. The size of the Schima cp genome is about 157 kilo base pairs (kb). They consistently encode 114 unique genes, including 80 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNAs, and 4 rRNAs, with 17 duplicated in the inverted repeat (IR). These cp genomes are highly conserved and do not show obvious expansion or contraction of the IR region. The percent variability of the 68 coding and 93 noncoding (>150 bp) fragments is consistently less than 3%. The seven most widely touted DNA barcode regions as well as one promising barcode candidate showed low sequence divergence. Eight mutational hotspots were identified from the 11 cp genomes. These hotspots may potentially be useful as specific DNA barcodes for species identification of Schima. The 58 cpSSR loci reported here are complementary to the microsatellite markers identified from the nuclear genome, and will be leveraged for further population-level studies. Phylogenetic relationships among the 11 Schima species were resolved with strong support based on the cp genome data set, which corresponds well with the species distribution pattern. The data presented here will serve as a foundation to facilitate species identification, DNA barcoding and phylogenetic reconstructions for future exploration of Schima.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28575004      PMCID: PMC5456055          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The chloroplast (cp) is a type of plastid that is critical to the growth of most plants, playing a major role in photosynthesis and fixation of CO2 [1]. The cp genomes in angiosperms are circular DNA molecules with a highly conserved gene order and gene content, and range from 120 to 160 kb in length [2]. These genomes typically include two copies of an inverted repeat (IR) region that is separated by a large-single-copy (LSC) region and a small-single-copy (SSC) region [3]. Due to the rapid accumulation of genomic data gleaned from next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies [4-6], more than 800 complete cp genomes of land plants have been sequenced (up to December 2016 from NCBI). The cp genome can provide valuable information for species identification, phylogeny and population genetic analyses [7-9]. It has also been postulated to be a potential ultra- or organelle-scale barcode for efficient plant species identification, especially for the taxonomically complex groups [10, 11]. Schima, with ca. 20 species, is an economically and ecologically important genus of the tea family (Theaceae). The genus is distributed in subtropical and tropical areas of East Asia, with 13 species (6 endemic) present in China [12]. Species of Schima are large trees and dominant elements of the subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests (SEBLFs) in East Asia [13, 14]. Some species are used as biological fire-resistant trees, and the wood is used for building and furniture [15, 16]. Schima is distinct from other genera within Theaceae, characterized by globose to oblate fruits and small reniform seeds with a marginal membranous wing. However, the infrageneric classification of Schima is complex and controversial due to a dearth of taxonomically diagnostic characters and high morphological similarity among species. This taxonomic uncertainty may hinder our exploitation and utilization of the genus. Since its establishment as a genus, there has been much debate regarding the number of species within Schima [17]. Eighteen species were proposed in the second edition of the “Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien” [18]. Bloembergen [19] regarded the genus as monotypic and subdivided Schima wallichii into nine geographically separated subspecies and three varieties. Airy-Shaw [20] recognized 15 species in Schima. Keng [21] accepted most of Bloembergen’s subspecies and raised them to the species level, and proposed that there were 10–15 species within the genus. The most recent treatment recognized ca. 20 species in Schima [12]. Schima is placed in tribe Gordonieae based on the results of molecular phylogenetic studies [22-24]. However, phylogenetic relationships within Schima are still unclear due to limited species sampling in previous studies, thus both species delimitations and phylogenetic reconstruction within Schima require further exploration. Complete cp genomes have been shown to be effective in resolving interspecies phylogenetic relationships within Camellia, a genus in the sister tribe (Theeae) to Gordonieae [25, 26]. Here, we sequenced 11 cp genomes of the 13 Chinese Schima species. This study aims to: (1) investigate structural patterns of Schima cp genomes, (2) screen sequence divergence hotspots in the 11 Schima cp genomes, (3) explore simple sequence repeats (SSRs) among the 11 Schima cp genomes, (4) and reconstruct phylogenetic relationships among the 11 Schima species using the cp genome sequences. The results will provide abundant information for further studies regarding taxonomy, phylogeny, and population genetics of Schima, and will also assist in the exploration and utilization of the resources within the genus.

Materials and methods

Taxon sampling

In this study, we follow the classification of Schima from Min and Bartholomew [12]. Healthy and fresh leaves from 11 species of Schima were sampled from various localities across southern China (Table 1). Voucher specimens of each species were collected and deposited in the Herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KUN). Gordonia lasianthus and Franklinia alatamaha were used as outgroups in the phylogenetic analyses, and the cp genomes of these two species were obtained from our previous work (Yu et al., unpublished work).
Table 1

List of taxa sampled in this study, with the voucher, chloroplast genome size, Illumina reads and coverage depth information.

TaxonVoucher specimenSourcesGenome sizeLSC length (bp)SSC length (bp)IR length (bp)GC content (%)No. reads (trimmed)Mean coverageGenBank No.
Schima argenteaYXQ041Yunnan, China157,24587,22218,09125,96637.437,448,533620.1KY406780
Schima brevipedicellataYXQ069Yunnan, China157,22787,20218,08925,96837.44687,2491538.6KY406758
Schima crenataYXQ103Hainan, China157,28887,23218,10425,97637.44701,2331679.4KY406755
Schima khasianaYXQ070Yunnan, China157,25287,20818,11225,96637.43459,8091106.5KY406794
Schima multibracteataYXQ146Guangxi, China157,27887,23318,10325,97137.44737,2921882.5KY406763
Schima noronhaeYXQ034Yunnan, China157,27887,21718,09125,98537.43527,9011284.3KY406787
Schima remotiserrataYXQ186Hunan, China157,28487,22918,10325,97637.43562,8011389.5KY406749
Schima sericansYXQ053Yunnan, China157,30287,27218,12225,95437.45748,1291735.2KY406779
Schima sinensisYXQ2902Sichuan, China157,29787,24318,10225,97637.4510,152,425716.8KY406762
Schima superbaYXQ142Guangxi, China157,25487,20218,10025,97637.44457,2151221.9KY406788
Schima wallichiiYXQ001Yunnan, China157,24087,20418,10425,96637.4428,86671.7KY406795

Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN), Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Voucher specimens were deposited in the Herbarium of Kunming Institute of Botany (KUN), Chinese Academy of Sciences.

DNA extraction, sequencing, chloroplast genome assembly

Total genomic DNA was isolated from fresh leaves (~100 mg) using the modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1987). Subsequently, the cp genomes were amplified using long-range PCR with fifteen primers [27]. The PCR products were fragmented for constructing short-insert (500 bp) libraries following the Illumina Nextera XT DNA library preparation instructions. Paired-end sequencing (250 bp) was performed on the Illumina MiSeq 2000 at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Germplasm Bank of Wild Species in Southwest China. Quality control of the raw sequence reads was performed using the NGS QC Tool Kit [28], with a cut-off value for percentage of read length and PHRED quality score as 80 and 30 following Yang et al. [5]. High-quality reads were assembled into contigs using the de novo assembler in CLC Genomics Workbench v6.5 (CLC Bio), using a k-mer of 64 and a minimum contig length of 500 base pairs (bp). The de novo contigs were assembled into complete chloroplast genomes followed the procedure of Yang et al. [5].

Chloroplast genome annotation and comparisons

The complete cp genomes were annotated with the identification of introns and exons using DOGMA [29]. The positions of start and stop codons and boundaries between introns and exons were investigated according to the published cp genome of Camellia taliensis (NC022264). The annotated GenBank files were used to draw the circular chloroplast genome maps using OrganellarGenomeDRAW [30]. The mVISTA program [31] was employed in the LAGAN mode to detect the variation of the chloroplast genomes. The cp genome of Schima sinensis was used as a reference. Microsatellites (mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexanucleotide repeats) were detected using Phobos v3.311 [32], with the parameters set to ten repeat units (≥ 10) for mononucleotide SSRs, six repeat units (≥ 6) for dinucleotide, four repeat units (≥ 4) for trinucleotide, four repeat units (≥ 4) for tetranucleotide, and three repeat units (≥ 3) for pentanucleotide and hexanucleotide SSRs. The percent variability for all protein-coding and noncoding (intergenic spacers and introns) regions of the cp genomes with an aligned length larger than 150 bp among the 11 Schima species was estimated in Geneious [33].

Phylogenetic inference

The cp genomes were aligned using MAFFT v7.221 [34] under default settings (FFT-NS-2 strategy). One of the IRs was removed from the data set for the phylogenetic analysis. Poorly aligned regions (mainly introns and spacers) of the data set were realigned using the G-INS-i (accurate strategy) to improve the quality of the alignment. We used jModelTest v0.11 [35] to select the best-fitting nucleotide substitution models for maximum-likelihood (ML) according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC; Akaike, 1974). ML analysis was implemented in RAxML v8.20 [36]. We conducted a rapid bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates) and searched for the best-scoring ML tree simultaneously (the “-f a” option). Numbers of variable and informative sites were calculated in DnaSP v5.10 [37].

Results

Chloroplast genome features

Illumina paired-end sequencing of long-range PCR amplified cp DNA generated 28,866–10,152,425 clean reads for the 11 sampled Schima species, with mean coverage from 71.7 to 1882.5. The genome size ranged from 157,227 bp in Schima brevipedicellata to 157,302 bp in Schima sericans (Table 1). All of the 11 cp genomes showed typical quadripartite structure consisting of a pair of IR (25,954–25,985 bp) separated by the LSC (87,202–87,272 bp) and SSC (18,089–18,122 bp) regions (Table 1). The cp genome map of Schima superba is presented as a representative (Fig 1). Excluding the duplicated IR region, the 11 Schima cp genomes identically encoded 114 different genes that were arranged in the same order, including 80 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNAs and 4 rRNAs. Seventeen genes were duplicated in the IRs, with six protein-coding genes, four rRNA and seven tRNA genes. Twelve of the protein-coding genes and six of the tRNA genes contained introns. Fifteen out of those eighteen genes contained a single intron, while the other three (clpP, rps12 and ycf3) had two introns. The 11 Schima cp genomes exhibited high similarity at the LSC/IR/SSC boundaries (Fig 2). The rps19 gene crossed the LSC/IRB (JLB) region with no variation of sequence length within the two parts. The SSC/IRB (JSB) junction occurred between the ycf1_like (incompletely duplicated in IRB) and the 3’ end of ndhF gene, with the sequence length of ycf1_like gene within IRB as 1388 or 1394. The ycf1 gene crossed the SSC/IRA (JSA) region, with 1388 or 1394 bp of ycf1 within IRA. The ycf1 related length changes were the only variation detected in these junctions. The LSC/IRA (JLA) junction was located at the 3’ end of the rps19_like (6 bp; incompletely duplicated in IRA), with a 14 bp noncoding sequence between JLA and trnH gene. In addition, we identified unusual start codons for four genes, ACG for ndhD, ATC for psbI, ATT for psbT and GTG for rps19.
Fig 1

Gene map of Schima superba chloroplast genome.

Fig 2

Comparisons of the border regions among the chloroplast genomes of 11 Schima species.

ycf1* (ycf1_like) and rps19* (rps19_like) represent the incomplete duplication of the gene within the IR region.

Comparisons of the border regions among the chloroplast genomes of 11 Schima species.

ycf1* (ycf1_like) and rps19* (rps19_like) represent the incomplete duplication of the gene within the IR region.

Chloroplast genome comparisons and divergence hotspots

Sequence identity plots of the 11 Schima cp genomes, generated using mVISTA, are shown in Fig 3. The plots illustrate the high sequence similarity across the Schima cp genomes, with a sequence identity of 99.1%. Two (ccsA and rps15) of the 49 variable protein-coding (>150 bp) genes had a percentage of variation above 1.00% (Table 2), while 19 (>150 bp) had no variation. Both of the two core DNA barcodes (rbcL and matK) [38] showed extremely low sequence divergence (0.21% and 0.33%, respectively). Furthermore, the variation of ycf1, the proposed “most promising chloroplast DNA barcode” of land plants [39], was only 0.67%. Among the 79 noncoding (>150 bp) regions, the percentage of variation ranged from 0.11% to 2.85% (Fig 4 and Table 3). Fourteen fragments (atpI-rps2, trnS (UGA)-psbZ, rps4-trnT (UGU), trnL (UAA)-trnF (GAA), petB-petD, rpl2 intron, rpl23-trnI (CAU), ycf15-trnL (CAA), trnL (CAA)-ndhB, ndhB intron, trnV (GAC)-rrn16, rrn16-trnI (GAU), trnA (UGC) intron, trnN (GUU)-ndhF) did not show any sequence variation. Eight potential mutational hotspots (trnW (CCA)-trnP (UGG), trnT (UGU)-trnL (UAA), trnG (UCC)-trnfM (CAU), petD-rpoA, psbB-psbT, ndhE-ndhG, ndhC-trnV (UAC), rpl32-trnL (UAG)) were identified, with the variation percentage exceeding 2.0% among the 11 sampled species (Fig 4 and Table 3). These eight highly variable hotspots may have the potential to be used as special DNA barcodes for identifying Schima species.
Fig 3

mVISTA percent identity plot comparison among the chloroplast genomes with S. sinensis as a reference.

Table 2

Sequence divergence of 49 variable coding regions (>150 bp) from 11 chloroplast genomes of Schima, with one of the Inverted Repeat regions removed.

FragmentsLength (bp)Aligned length (bp)Variable positionsNucleotide substitutionsNumber of indelsTotal length of indelsPercent variability (%)
matK1527152755000.33
psbK18618611000.54
psbI153–15615630130.64
atpA1524152433000.20
atpF56756722000.35
atpI74474411000.13
rps271171111000.14
rpoC2413741371111000.27
rpoC12061206133000.15
rpoB321332131111000.34
psbC1422142233000.21
psaB2205220522000.09
psaA2253225366000.27
rps460660622000.33
ndhK67867811000.15
ndhC36336322000.55
atpE40240211000.25
atpB1497149711000.07
rbcL1428142833000.21
accD1542154244000.26
ycf455555533000.54
cemA69069022000.29
petA96396322000.21
rpl2035435411000.28
rps1237237211000.27
clpP64564533000.47
psbB1527152722000.13
petB66366344000.60
rpoA1014101422000.20
rps1141741733000.72
infA23423411000.43
rps840840811000.25
rpl1436936933000.81
rpl1641141122000.49
rps365765722000.30
rpl2247447411000.21
ycf26867–6873687382160.04
rps746846811000.21
ndhF2247–2253225326142120.71
rpl3216216211000.62
ccsA9639631010001.04
ndhD1530153033000.20
psaC24624611000.41
ndhE30630611000.33
ndhG53153133000.56
ndhA1092109222000.18
ndhH1182118222000.17
rps1527327333001.10
ycf15652–565856584337160.67
Fig 4

Percentage of variation in 79 variable noncoding regions of the 11 Schima chloroplast genomes.

These regions are oriented according to their locations in the genome.

Table 3

Sequence divergence of 79 variable noncoding loci (>150 bp) from 11 chloroplast genomes of Schima, with one of the invert repeat regions removed.

FragmentsLength (bp)Aligned length (bp)Variable positionsNucleotide substitutionsNumber of indelsTotal length of indelsPercent variability (%)
trnH (GUG)-psbA395–4264283741331.17
psbA-trnK (UUU)22022011000.45
trnK (UUU)-matK27027022000.74
matK-trnK (UUU)712–71371321110.28
trnK (UUU)-rps16809–81881922104121.71
rps16 intron838–844845103270.59
rps16-trnQ (UUG)1689–1698170036184181.29
trnQ (UUG)-psbK33333322000.60
psbK-psbI34534533000.87
trnS (GCU)-trnG (UCC)681–68268233000.44
trnG (UCC) intron690–69669682160.43
trnG (UCC)-trnR (UCU)276–3113113721350.96
atpF intron70170122000.29
atpF-atpH387–38938975121.54
atpH-atpI1143–115311531544110.69
rps2-rpoC2254–25525510110.39
rpoC1 intron732–73473420120.14
rpoB-trnC (GCA)1211–122212222694171.06
trnC (GCA)-petN722–72772783150.55
petN-psbM1123–112511251513121.24
psbM-trnD (GUC)1136–115311532785191.13
trnE (UUC)-trnT (GGU)47347355001.06
trnT (GGU)-psbD1513–151715191911380.92
psbC-trnS (UGA)234–23923961150.84
psbZ-trnG (UCC)28328311000.35
trnG (UCC)-trnfM (CAU)157–15916052232.50
trnfM (CAU)-rps1415415422001.30
psaA-ycf3747–7557551733140.79
ycf3 intron172172122000.28
ycf3 intron272672622000.28
ycf3-trnS (GGA)839–84284284340.83
trnS (GGA)-rps429329311000.34
trnT (UGU)-trnL (UAA)982–99999946196272.50
trnL (UAA) intron522–52952970170.19
trnF (GAA)-ndhJ704–7147152134180.98
ndhC-trnV (UAC)400–4144173636332.16
trnV (UAC) intron58558522000.34
trnV (UAC)-trnM (CAU)16616611000.60
trnM (CAU)-atpE229–2382401302130.83
atpB-rbcL765–76876852130.39
rbcL-accD525–52652643110.76
accD-psaI681–68368342120.44
psaI-ycf4423–42542531120.47
ycf4-cemA909–915915137160.87
cemA-petA220–22822880280.88
petA-psbJ1035–10421043124380.67
psbE-petL1277–1287128722122101.09
petL-petG185–18618610110.54
trnW (CCA)-trnP (UGG)170–17517594152.86
trnP (UGG)-psaJ391–39339320120.25
psaJ-rpl33455–45745753120.88
rpl33-rps18175–17617621111.14
rps18-rpl2028428411000.35
rpl20-rps1278678644000.51
clpP intron1598–6056071335101.32
clpP intron2797–79879832110.38
clpP-psbB473–47947982160.63
psbB-psbT172–17417453122.30
petB intron78778733000.38
petD intron71171177000.98
petD-rpoA200–2132151505152.33
rps8-rpl1419619611000.51
rpl16 intron996–9989981311121.20
rpl16-rps3150–2002005221501.50
rps12 intron53653622000.37
rps12-trnV (GAC)1602–161916192925270.43
trnI (GAU) intron93893811000.11
trnA (UGC)-rrn2315215211000.66
rrn4.5-rrn5256–2752751901190.36
rrn5-trnR (ACG)248–24924921110.80
trnR (ACG)-trnN (GUU)59559577001.18
ndhF-rpl32825–8478513264261.18
rpl32-trnL (UAG)908–92692836136232.05
ccsA-ndhD240–24424561251.22
psaC-ndhE251–25425441130.79
ndhE-ndhG23023055002.17
ndhG-ndhI359–36036065111.67
ndhA intron1106–11111112168380.99
rps15-ycf137937955001.32

Percentage of variation in 79 variable noncoding regions of the 11 Schima chloroplast genomes.

These regions are oriented according to their locations in the genome. The aligned length of the complete cp genome (with one of the IR removed) among the 11 Schima species was 130,508 bp, with the total number of variable and parsimony informative (PI) sites being 1,121 bp and 261 bp, respectively. This data set contained 131 indels with a total length of 586 bp, and the percent variability was 0.51%. These results indicate that the global variation of the cp genome within Schima is extremely low. A similar pattern was reported in other long-lived plants [40-42]. The ability to identify species within the genus using cp genome data needs to be assessed by sampling multiple individuals per species, even though the phylogenetic analyses have most of the species separated from each other (see below).

SSR polymorphisms

In total, 58 cpSSRs, including 55 mononucleotide (A, T), 1 dinucleotide (AT) and 2 trinucleotide (ATT, TTA) repeats were detected within the 11 Schima cp genomes. No tetranucleotide, pentanucleotide or hexanucleotide repeats were observed. The mononucleotide repeat (A, T) was found to be the most abundant, with repeat numbers of 10, 11 and 12 (Table 4). The proportion of A and T repeats in mononucleotide repeat unit was 43.64% and 56.36%, respectively. Only one SSR locus with a different repeat unit (C) was detected in the trnG (UCC)-trnfM (CAU) intergenic spacer region. Within the 11 Schima cp genomes, SSR loci were primarily located in the LSC region (89.09%), followed by the SSC portion (14.55%), with only one present in the IR region (rrn5-trnR (ACG)) (Table 4). One SSR locus was detected in the protein-coding gene psbI, with all others located in gene spacers and introns. No SSRs were found in the tRNAs and rRNAs. The mononucleotide repeat (A) in trnH-psbA was the most variable SSR, with the size ranging from 12 to 42 bp. The cpSSRs of the 11 Schima species represented here showed abundant variation, and could be useful for research at the population level. They will provide complementary data to the SSR markers of Schima identified from the nuclear genome [43].
Table 4

Location of SSR loci within the 11 Schima genomes.

No.MotifLocationRegionRepeat length
1AtrnH-psbALSC12–43
2AtrnK (UUU) intronLSC10–11
3AtrnK (UUU)-rps16LSC9–10
4AtrnK (UUU)-rps16LSC11–14
5AtrnK (UUU)-rps16LSC8–10
6Trps16-trnQ (UUG)LSC9–14
7Arps16-trnQ (UUG)LSC8–10
8Trps16-trnQ (UUG)LSC8–11
9TpsbILSC10, 13
10AatpA-atpFLSC14,15
11TatpF-atpHLSC9–12
12ATatpF-atpHLSC12,14
13AatpH-atpILSC13–20
14TatpH-atpILSC12,13
15Arps2-rpoC2LSC10,11
16ArpoC2-trnC (GCA)LSC9,10
17TpsbM-trnD (GUC)LSC10,11
18TtrnT (GGU)-psbDLSC9,10
19AtrnT (GGU)-psbDLSC9–14
20TpsbC-trnS (UGA)LSC11–16
21CtrnG (UCC)-trnfM (CAU)LSC8, 10
22AtrnG (UCC)-trnfM (CAU)LSC9,10
23ApsaA-ycf3LSC10–14
24Aycf3-trnS (GGA)LSC11,12
25Aycf3-trnS (GGA)LSC11,12
26AtrnT (UGU)-trnL (UAA)LSC13,14
27TtrnF (GAA)-ndhJLSC9, 10
28TndhC-trnV (UAC)LSC8–16
29TndhC-trnV (UAC)LSC9–12
30TTAndhC-trnV (UAC)LSC3,12
31TndhC-trnV (UAC)LSC9,10
32TtrnM (CAU)-atpELSC9–12
33TatpB-rbcLLSC12–15
34TrbcL-accDLSC11,12
35TaccD-psaILSC13–15
36TpsaI-ycf4LSC10–12
37TpetA-psbJLSC10–13
38TpetA-psbJLSC10,11
39TpetL-petGLSC10,11
40TtrnP (UGG)-psaJLSC10–12
41Trpl20-rps12LSC6,10
42TclpP intronLSC10,11
43AclpP intronLSC9–11
44AclpP intronLSC9,10
45ATTclpP-psbBLSC6,12
46ApsbB-psbTLSC8–10
47TpetD-rpoALSC9,10
48ApetD-rpoALSC9–11
49ApetD-rpoALSC9,10
50Arrn5-trnR (ACG)IR9,10
51TndhF-rpl32SSC9–12
52TndhF-rpl32SSC10,11
53Arpl32-trnL (UAG)SSC10,11
54Trpl32-trnL (UAG)SSC10–13
55TccsA-ndhDSSC10–13
56TpsaC-ndhESSC9–12
57TndhG-ndhISSC10,11
58AndhA intronSSC9,10

Phylogenetic analyses

The data matrix we used for phylogenetic estimation consisted of an alignment containing entire cp genomes with one of the IRs removed. This data set was comprised of 131,113 nucleotide positions, with 2,508 variable sites (1.91%) and 427 PI sites (0.33%). ML analysis resulted in a well-resolved tree, with eight of the 10 nodes supported by 100% bootstrap values (BS). All Schima species grouped into a strongly supported clade (BS = 100%, Fig 5), indicating Schima is monophyletic. Two main clades were recovered, with Schima sericans being sister to those two lineages. Five species (S. argentea, S. brevipedicellata, S. khasiana, S. noronhae, S. wallichii) formed clade I (BS = 100%, Fig 5). The remaining five species (S. sinensis, S. superba, S. remotiserrata, S. multibracteata and S. crenata) grouped in clade II (BS = 100%, Fig 5). The branch leading to S. superba and three closely related species is extremely short, and bootstrap support values for two internal nodes within this clade are less than 80%.
Fig 5

Phylogenetic relationships among the 11 Schima species.

The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the whole chloroplast genome data set minus a copy of the IR region. Numbers above the branches show bootstrap support values that are above 80%.

Phylogenetic relationships among the 11 Schima species.

The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the whole chloroplast genome data set minus a copy of the IR region. Numbers above the branches show bootstrap support values that are above 80%.

Discussion

Chloroplast genome features and comparison within Theaceae

Prior to this study, Camellia was the only genus within Theaceae to have its cp genome sequenced [25, 26]. In the present study, we sequenced cp genomes of 11 species from Schima. The cp genomes all displayed typical quadripartite structure (Fig 1), which is consistent amongst most lineages of angiosperms [2]. The expansion and contraction of the IR region is considered to be the primary mechanism affecting length variation of angiosperm cp genomes, as demonstrated in Trochodendraceae [44] and Apiales [45]. However, only minor variation was detected at the SSC/IRA boundary of all of the 11 Schima cp genomes (Fig 2). Although the genes located at the IR junctions are identical in cp genomes of Schima and Camellia, the overall cp genome sequences of Schima are more homogenous as compared to Camellia, which was suggested to show more differences at the junction regions [26]. The cp genomes of Schima encode the same set of protein-coding genes as previously reported Camellia species, with the exception of Orf 42 and Orf 188 which were reported in Camellia [25], but not in other Ericales members such as Actinidia (Actinidiaceae) and Ardisia (Primulaceae) [46, 47]. For the whole cp genomes of Schima, 37 tRNA genes were annotated, which is consistent with Huang et al. [26]. However, 38 tRNA genes were found in Yang et al. [25], due to a redundant annotation of trnP (UGG) in their study. As compared with sequences of Camellia, no significant structural rearrangements such as inversions or changes of gene locations were found in the 11 Schima cp genomes. The high sequence similarity across the Schima cp genomes (Fig 3) may be associated with long generation time and recent radiation.

Potentially specific DNA barcodes for Schima

Since the concept of DNA barcoding was proposed over a decade ago [48], substantial efforts have been made to develop DNA barcodes possessing both high universality and efficiency. Kress et al. [49] suggested that the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and trnH-psbA spacer region had potential as useful DNA barcode regions for flowering plants. Hollingsworth et al. [38] later advocated matK and rbcL as a two-locus core barcode for land plants after comparing seven leading candidate loci, subsequently the nrDNA ITS was recommended to be incorporated into core barcode based on a large-scale sapmpling of seed plants [50]. Dong et al. [39] proposed that ycf1 was the most variable loci of the cp genome, which might be a promising DNA barcode performing better than existing plastid candidate barcodes of land plants. However, all of the five candidate protein-coding DNA barcodes (matK, rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1 and ycf1) showed extremely low sequence variation (<1.00%), and the other three fragments are also not among the most variable spacers. The eight potential mutational hotspots (trnW (CCA)-trnP (UGG), trnT (UGU)-trnL (UAA), trnG (UCC)-trnfM (CAU), petD-rpoA, psbB-psbT, ndhE-ndhG, ndhC-trnV (UAC), rpl32-trnL (UAG)) (Fig 4 and Table 3) identified in this study could be suitable barcodes for Schima. Recently, using the cp genome as a possible ultra- or organelle-scale barcode for efficient plant species identification was discussed [10, 11]. The high phylogenetic resolution among closely related species of Schima (Fig 5) suggests that the cp genome may indeed be useful as an organelle-scale barcode for species identification of Schima. Further studies based on sampling at the population scale are needed to evaluate the efficiency of the barcodes mentioned above and also the cp genome as an organelle-scale barcode.

Phylogenetic relationships among species of Schima

The cp genome has been suggested to be useful for phylogenetic reconstructions at low taxonomic levels [7, 8, 10, 51]. Interspecies phylogenetic relationships within Camellia (Theaceae) were well-resolved using cp genome data [25, 26]. In the present study, based on a recent classification of the genus [12], 11 out of 13 Schima species occurring in China were represented. The phylogenetic relationships within Schima were well resolved with strong support based on cp genome sequences (Fig 5). Therefore, our study indicates that the complete cp genome has significant potential to resolve the low level phylogenetic relationships. Schima sericans, the first diverging lineage among sampled species, is distributed in southeastern Xizang and northwestern Yunnan in China. Schima sericans was sister to the remaining taxa, which formed two clades. Clade I includes five species (S. argentea, S. brevipedicellata, S. khasiana, S. noronhae and S. wallichii) that are primarily distributed in southwestern China and Indochina. Clade II comprises five species (S. sinensis, S. superba, S. remotiserrata, S. multibracteata and S. crenata) that mainly occur within central and eastern China (Fig 5). The phylogenetic relationships within Schima found here correspond well with the geographic distribution pattern, but do not match well with morphology. Schima was classified into two groups based on the shape of the leaf margin (entire or serrate) [12]. However, all of the species within clade I possess a serrate leaf margin except S. khasiana. Likewise, S. multibracteata is the only species with an entire leaf margin in clade II (Fig 5). Our results suggest that the taxonomic value of leaf margin shape should be reassessed for classification of Schima. Additionally, the branch length of the clade including S. superba and three closely related species is extremely short, indicating that these four species have recently diversified, or perhaps illustrating past hybridization within the group. These results indicate that the current treatment of the genus needs to be reevaluated by integrating more types of evidence.
  35 in total

1.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA.

Authors:  Stacia K Wyman; Robert K Jansen; Jeffrey L Boore
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Ultra-barcoding in cacao (Theobroma spp.; Malvaceae) using whole chloroplast genomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA.

Authors:  Nolan Kane; Saemundur Sveinsson; Hannes Dempewolf; Ji Yong Yang; Dapeng Zhang; Johannes M M Engels; Quentin Cronk
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.

Authors:  David Posada
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data.

Authors:  Matthew Kearse; Richard Moir; Amy Wilson; Steven Stones-Havas; Matthew Cheung; Shane Sturrock; Simon Buxton; Alex Cooper; Sidney Markowitz; Chris Duran; Tobias Thierer; Bruce Ashton; Peter Meintjes; Alexei Drummond
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Comparative chloroplast genomes of camellia species.

Authors:  Jun-Bo Yang; Shi-Xiong Yang; Hong-Tao Li; Jing Yang; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequences of Five Epimedium Species: Lights into Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Analyses.

Authors:  Yanjun Zhang; Liuwen Du; Ao Liu; Jianjun Chen; Li Wu; Weiming Hu; Wei Zhang; Kyunghee Kim; Sang-Choon Lee; Tae-Jin Yang; Ying Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  OrganellarGenomeDRAW--a suite of tools for generating physical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes and visualizing expression data sets.

Authors:  Marc Lohse; Oliver Drechsel; Sabine Kahlau; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Sequencing of whole plastid genomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA of Diospyros species (Ebenaceae) endemic to New Caledonia: many species, little divergence.

Authors:  Barbara Turner; Ovidiu Paun; Jérôme Munzinger; Mark W Chase; Rosabelle Samuel
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.357

View more
  20 in total

1.  Phylotranscriptomics of Theaceae: generic-level relationships, reticulation and whole-genome duplication.

Authors:  Qiong Zhang; Lei Zhao; Ryan A Folk; Jian-Li Zhao; Nelson A Zamora; Shi-Xiong Yang; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Lian-Ming Gao; Hua Peng; Xiang-Qin Yu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The specific DNA barcodes based on chloroplast genes for species identification of Theaceae plants.

Authors:  Shuai Jiang; Fenglin Chen; Pai Qin; Hai Xie; Guo Peng; Yongliang Li; Xinhong Guo
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2022-04-19

3.  Comparative Chloroplast Genomics of Seven Endangered Cypripedium Species and Phylogenetic Relationships of Orchidaceae.

Authors:  Jun-Yi Zhang; Min Liao; Yue-Hong Cheng; Yu Feng; Wen-Bing Ju; Heng-Ning Deng; Xiong Li; Andelka Plenković-Moraj; Bo Xu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Molecular Evolution of Chloroplast Genomes of Orchid Species: Insights into Phylogenetic Relationship and Adaptive Evolution.

Authors:  Wan-Lin Dong; Ruo-Nan Wang; Na-Yao Zhang; Wei-Bing Fan; Min-Feng Fang; Zhong-Hu Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Four Aconitum Medicinal Species.

Authors:  Jing Meng; Xuepei Li; Hongtao Li; Junbo Yang; Hong Wang; Jun He
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Evolutionary dynamics of the chloroplast genome sequences of six Colobanthus species.

Authors:  Piotr Androsiuk; Jan Paweł Jastrzębski; Łukasz Paukszto; Karol Makowczenko; Adam Okorski; Agnieszka Pszczółkowska; Katarzyna Joanna Chwedorzewska; Ryszard Górecki; Irena Giełwanowska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Taxonomy in the Kunming Institute of Botany (KIB): Progress during the past decade (2008-2018) and perspectives on future development.

Authors:  Xiangqin Yu; Chunlei Xiang; Hua Peng
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2018-08-18

8.  Interspecific chloroplast genome sequence diversity and genomic resources in Diospyros.

Authors:  Wenqing Li; Yanlei Liu; Yong Yang; Xiaoman Xie; Yizeng Lu; Zhirong Yang; Xiaobai Jin; Wenpan Dong; Zhili Suo
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Comparison of eight complete chloroplast genomes of the endangered Aquilaria tree species (Thymelaeaceae) and their phylogenetic relationships.

Authors:  Muhammad Syahmi Hishamuddin; Shiou Yih Lee; Wei Lun Ng; Shairul Izan Ramlee; Dhilia Udie Lamasudin; Rozi Mohamed
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Complete Plastome Sequences of Eleven Capsicum Genotypes: Insights into DNA Variation and Molecular Evolution.

Authors:  Nunzio D'Agostino; Rachele Tamburino; Concita Cantarella; Valentina De Carluccio; Lorenza Sannino; Salvatore Cozzolino; Teodoro Cardi; Nunzia Scotti
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.