Mohammad Amin Kashef1, Jennifer Friderici2, Jaime Hernandez-Montfort1, Auras R Atreya1, Peter Lindenauer3, Tara Lagu3. 1. Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts; Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Academic Affairs, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts. 3. Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts; Center for Quality of Care Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There have been no recent studies describing the management and outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to a tertiary medical center from 2007 to 2011 with a Duke criteria consistent discharge diagnosis of IE. We examined concordance with guideline recommendations. Outcomes included embolic events, inhospital and 1-year mortality, length of stay (LOS) and cardiac surgery. We used descriptive statistics to describe the cohort and Fisher exact and unpaired t tests to compare native valve endocarditis (NVE) with prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). RESULTS: Of 170 patients, definite IE was present in 135 (79.4%) and possible IE in 35 (20.6%); 74.7% had NVE, and 25.3% had PVE. Mean ± standard deviation age was 60.0 ± 17.9 years. Comparing PVE to NVE, patients with PVE were less likely to have embolic events (14.0% vs. 32.3%; P = 0.03), had shorter LOS (median 12.0 days vs. 14.0 days; P = 0.047), but they did not show a statistically significant difference in inhospital mortality (20.9% vs. 12.6%; P = 0.21). Of 170, patients 27.6% (n = 47) underwent valve surgery. Most patients received timely blood cultures and antibiotics. Guideline-recommended consults were underused, with 86.5%, 54.1%, and 47.1% of patients receiving infectious disease, cardiac surgery, and cardiology consultation, respectively. As the number of consultations increased (from 0 to 3), we observed a nonsignificant trend toward reduction in 6-month readmission and 12-month mortality. CONCLUSION: IE remains a disease with significant morbidity and mortality. There are gaps in the care of IE patients, most notably underuse of specialty consultation. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:414-420.
OBJECTIVE: There have been no recent studies describing the management and outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to a tertiary medical center from 2007 to 2011 with a Duke criteria consistent discharge diagnosis of IE. We examined concordance with guideline recommendations. Outcomes included embolic events, inhospital and 1-year mortality, length of stay (LOS) and cardiac surgery. We used descriptive statistics to describe the cohort and Fisher exact and unpaired t tests to compare native valve endocarditis (NVE) with prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). RESULTS: Of 170 patients, definite IE was present in 135 (79.4%) and possible IE in 35 (20.6%); 74.7% had NVE, and 25.3% had PVE. Mean ± standard deviation age was 60.0 ± 17.9 years. Comparing PVE to NVE, patients with PVE were less likely to have embolic events (14.0% vs. 32.3%; P = 0.03), had shorter LOS (median 12.0 days vs. 14.0 days; P = 0.047), but they did not show a statistically significant difference in inhospital mortality (20.9% vs. 12.6%; P = 0.21). Of 170, patients 27.6% (n = 47) underwent valve surgery. Most patients received timely blood cultures and antibiotics. Guideline-recommended consults were underused, with 86.5%, 54.1%, and 47.1% of patients receiving infectious disease, cardiac surgery, and cardiology consultation, respectively. As the number of consultations increased (from 0 to 3), we observed a nonsignificant trend toward reduction in 6-month readmission and 12-month mortality. CONCLUSION: IE remains a disease with significant morbidity and mortality. There are gaps in the care of IE patients, most notably underuse of specialty consultation. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:414-420.
Authors: P Tornos; B Iung; G Permanyer-Miralda; G Baron; F Delahaye; Ch Gohlke-Bärwolf; E G Butchart; P Ravaud; A Vahanian Journal: Heart Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Larry M Baddour; Walter R Wilson; Arnold S Bayer; Vance G Fowler; Imad M Tleyjeh; Michael J Rybak; Bruno Barsic; Peter B Lockhart; Michael H Gewitz; Matthew E Levison; Ann F Bolger; James M Steckelberg; Robert S Baltimore; Anne M Fink; Patrick O'Gara; Kathryn A Taubert Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David R Murdoch; G Ralph Corey; Bruno Hoen; José M Miró; Vance G Fowler; Arnold S Bayer; Adolf W Karchmer; Lars Olaison; Paul A Pappas; Philippe Moreillon; Stephen T Chambers; Vivian H Chu; Vicenç Falcó; David J Holland; Philip Jones; John L Klein; Nigel J Raymond; Kerry M Read; Marie Francoise Tripodi; Riccardo Utili; Andrew Wang; Christopher W Woods; Christopher H Cabell Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-03-09