Literature DB >> 18485744

Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses.

C C Chen1, S J Kiebel, K J Friston.   

Abstract

This paper describes a dynamic causal model (DCM) for induced or spectral responses as measured with the electroencephalogram (EEG) or the magnetoencephalogram (MEG). We model the time-varying power, over a range of frequencies, as the response of a distributed system of coupled electromagnetic sources to a spectral perturbation. The model parameters encode the frequency response to exogenous input and coupling among sources and different frequencies. The Bayesian inversion of this model, given data enables inferences about the parameters of a particular model and allows us to compare different models, or hypotheses. One key aspect of the model is that it differentiates between linear and non-linear coupling; which correspond to within and between-frequency coupling respectively. To establish the face validity of our approach, we generate synthetic data and test the identifiability of various parameters to ensure they can be estimated accurately, under different levels of noise. We then apply our model to EEG data from a face-perception experiment, to ask whether there is evidence for non-linear coupling between early visual cortex and fusiform areas.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18485744     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  59 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian quantitative electrophysiology and its multiple applications in bioengineering.

Authors:  Roger C Barr; Loren W Nolte; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Model driven EEG/fMRI fusion of brain oscillations.

Authors:  Pedro A Valdes-Sosa; Jose Miguel Sanchez-Bornot; Roberto Carlos Sotero; Yasser Iturria-Medina; Yasser Aleman-Gomez; Jorge Bosch-Bayard; Felix Carbonell; Tohru Ozaki
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG.

Authors:  Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Joachim Gross
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Dynamic causal modeling for EEG and MEG.

Authors:  Stefan J Kiebel; Marta I Garrido; Rosalyn Moran; Chun-Chuan Chen; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Testing for nested oscillation.

Authors:  W D Penny; E Duzel; K J Miller; J G Ojemann
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  On the similarity of functional connectivity between neurons estimated across timescales.

Authors:  Ian H Stevenson; Konrad P Körding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Connectivity Analysis is Essential to Understand Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  James B Rowe
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-17

8.  Dynamic Causal Models for phase coupling.

Authors:  W D Penny; V Litvak; L Fuentemilla; E Duzel; K Friston
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  K E Stephan; W D Penny; R J Moran; H E M den Ouden; J Daunizeau; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Computational and dynamic models in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.