Literature DB >> 28573112

Sister Mary Joseph nodule: it does not bode well.

Stephen A Geller1,2, Fernando P F de Campos3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal Neoplasms; Neoplasm Metastasis; Sister Mary Joseph’s Nodule; Umbilicus

Year:  2014        PMID: 28573112      PMCID: PMC5444392          DOI: 10.4322/acr.2014.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Autops Case Rep        ISSN: 2236-1960


× No keyword cloud information.
Sister Mary Joseph, the superintendent nurse and surgical assistant of Dr. William Mayo at St Mary’s Hospital (presently Mayo Clinic), was the first to note the association of umbilical nodules with intra-abdominal malignancy.1,2 Dr. Hamilton Bailey, a British surgeon, in his classic book Physical Signs in Clinical Surgery3 named the lesion for Sister Mary Joseph; the palpable bulging usually firm nodule distorting and invading into the umbilicus as a manifestation of metastatic malignancy from the abdomen or the pelvis. Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule (SMJN), was at the time of its description, recognized as metastatic disease.3 Histologically, SMJNs are predominantly adenocarcinoma (75% of the cases), mostly metastatic from primary gastrointestinal (GI) tract or gynecological sites (12-15%) and, as in the case shown here, mucus-secreting.3 In the GI tract the stomach is the leading malignant primary site, followed by colorectal and pancreas (more often the body and tail, rather than the head), whereas ovarian serous papillary cyst adenocarcinoma is the most common site in females.4-6 Occurring rarely, SMJNs may be metastatic from a wide variety of other primary sites: gallbladder, liver, breast, lung, prostate, penis, peritoneum, lymphoma, bladder, kidney, endometrium, cervix, vagina, vulva, and fallopian tube.6,7 SMJNs may be diagnosed on routine physical examination, during surgical workup or may represent the patient’s presenting complaint. In some series8 this umbilical lesion was the initial manifestation of the internal malignancy. The umbilical metastasis may be direct extension from a contiguous tumor, by hematogenous or lymphatic spread, and uncommonly, as extension along the remnants of embryonic ligaments. Direct implantation after laparoscopy may also spread tumors to the umbilicus.9-11 Clinically; the lesion is often a painful, hard lump with irregular margins. It is sometimes purplish, eventually ulcerates and varies in size from 0.5 to 2 cm. Tumors as large as 10 cm have been reported.4,11,12 Differential diagnosis should include benign causes such as endometriosis, melanocytic nevi, dermatofibroma, fibroma, urachal duct cyst, pilonidal sinus, keloid, foreign body, granuloma, myxoma, omphalitis and umbilical hernia,5,13,14 as well as primary malignant umbilical skin tumors.5,13 Benign umbilical nodules (endometriosis, fibroma, foreign body granuloma, keloid, myxoma) are sometimes called “pseudo SMJN”15 although using the term in this manner may be unnecessarily confusing and should be avoided. Each of the benign lesions has distinctive gross and microscopic features. SMJN usually represents widespread advanced cancer and therefore is associated with poor prognosis, almost always indicating inoperability although, particularly with direct extension from a primary site, this may not always obtain. Depending on the patient’s general conditions as well as the characteristics of the primary neoplasm, the mean survival time is approximately 11 months. Fewer than 15% of patients survive more than 2 years after diagnosis.4
  14 in total

1.  TUMORS OF THE UMBILICUS.

Authors:  W D STECK; E B HELWIG
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule presenting as large bowel obstruction: a case report and brief review of the literature.

Authors:  Brant W Ullery; Heather Wachtel; Steven E Raper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  [An umbilical nodule].

Authors:  J Jacques; L Mesturoux; C Vong; R Legros; V Loustaud-Ratti
Journal:  Rev Med Interne       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 0.728

4.  Sister (Mary?) Joseph's nodule.

Authors:  I S Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: international survey.

Authors:  V Paolucci; B Schaeff; M Schneider; C Gutt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  [The umbilical metastasis. Sister Mary Joseph and her time].

Authors:  D Trebing; H-D Göring
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  Sister Mary Joseph's nodule of the umbilicus: is it always of gastric origin? A review of eight cases at different sites of origin.

Authors:  F Al-Mashat; A M Sibiany
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.224

8.  Sister Joseph's nodule in a liver transplant recipient: Case report and mini-review of literature.

Authors:  Fabrizio Panaro; Enzo Andorno; Stefano Di Domenico; Nicola Morelli; Giuliano Bottino; Rosalia Mondello; Marco Miggino; Tomasz M Jarzembowski; Ferruccio Ravazzoni; Marco Casaccia; Umberto Valente
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Umbilical metastases: current viewpoint.

Authors:  Raimondo Gabriele; Marco Conte; Federico Egidi; Mario Borghese
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Sister Mary Joseph's nodule at a University teaching hospital in northwestern Tanzania: a retrospective review of 34 cases.

Authors:  Phillipo L Chalya; Joseph B Mabula; Peter F Rambau; Mabula D McHembe
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.